On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 12:20 PM, D. J. Bernstein <d...@cr.yp.to> wrote:
> Ryan Sleevi writes: > > What use case makes the "NaCl" algorithms (whose specification is merely > > 'use NaCl', which boils down to "Use Salsa+Curve25519") worthwhile? > > > Of course, this doesn't imply that NaCl is what developers want, but > high-profile applications such as DNSCrypt are in fact using NaCl in > ways that seem easily generalizable to other applications. > There are linux distributions that do not consider or cite NaCl. If an Open Source developer did not follow other sources of discussion he not would know it. I dunno why. Perhaps it is due to the FIFS 140. I am sorry if the observation is OT. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FedoraCryptoConsolidation > > ---D. J. Bernstein > Research Professor, Computer Science, University of Illinois at Chicago > _______________________________________________ > cryptography mailing list > cryptography@randombit.net > http://lists.randombit.net/mailman/listinfo/cryptography >
_______________________________________________ cryptography mailing list cryptography@randombit.net http://lists.randombit.net/mailman/listinfo/cryptography
