"Peter N. Biddle" wrote: > Hey Ed - I think that we may be in agreement. Most of what you say below > makes sense to me. what you said also looks good > I'd love to see your papers. A recent summary is at http://nma.com/papers/gerck_on_trust.pdf Cheers, Ed Gerck --------------------------------------------------------------------- The Cryptography Mailing List Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: Cryptogram: Palladium Only for DRM José Azevedo
- Re: Cryptogram: Palladium Only for DRM Niels Ferguson
- Re: Cryptogram: Palladium Only for DRM sasKuach
- Re: Cryptogram: Palladium Only for DRM asokan
- RE: Cryptogram: Palladium Only for DRM Trei, Peter
- Re: Cryptogram: Palladium Only for DRM Ed Gerck
- Re: Cryptogram: Palladium Only for DRM Peter
- Re: Cryptogram: Palladium Only for DRM Ed Gerck
- Re: Cryptogram: Palladium Only for DRM Peter N. Biddle
- RE: Cryptogram: Palladium Only for DRM Lucky Green
- Re: Cryptogram: Palladium Only for DRM Peter
- Re: Cryptogram: Palladium Only for DRM Nomen Nescio
- Re: Cryptogram: Palladium Only for DRM Peter N. Biddle
- Re: Cryptogram: Palladium Only for DRM David Wagner