On Tue, 3 Dec 2002, James A. Donald wrote:

>Anything that is good, gets ported a lot.  Anything that is
>ported a lot gets build/port problems.


Actually, I've found the reverse to be true.  Anything that gets
ported a lot eventually gets all the portability crap straightened
out so that porting it becomes just a matter of providing a few
definitions in a well-documented file.

If something still has porting problems, I'd say it hasn't been
ported enough.

                                Bear


---------------------------------------------------------------------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to