choosing a standard OS license for Crypto++

[Wei Dai]

Thanks to some prodding from Zooko, I've decided that the main reasons for 
Crypto++ having its own license no longer applies, so I might as well choose 
a standard open source license for it. The Boost Software License (see 
http://www.opensource.org/licenses/bsl1.0 and 
http://www.boost.org/users/license.html), with an added disclaimer that the 
library is only copyrighted as a compilation, seems suitable since like the 
current Crypto++ license it doesn’t require the copyright notice and 
license to be included in object code distributions. Does anyone have any 
other suggestions or comments? 

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the "Crypto++ Users" 
Google Group.
To unsubscribe, send an email to cryptopp-users-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
More information about Crypto++ and this group is available at 
http://www.cryptopp.com.