For the benefit of anyone picking up this thread I would like to point out that the problem was due to a compiler bug in the sun 12.4 compiler. On moving to version 565 of cryptopp and using the 12.5 compiler this problem went away.
On Monday, 12 September 2016 10:02:18 UTC+1, Andrew Marlow wrote: > > Many thanks for releasing version 564. I see there are lots of > improvements :-) > > I had a go testing it on Solaris 11 with Sun Studio 12.4 in 64 bit and > have to report a few problems: > > 1) There could be more info in the Readme.txt to explain how to build it > on solaris. > 2) I had to hack the makefile to remove use of the -pipe option, near > where it says: Add -pipe for everything except ARM (allow ARM-64 because > they seems to have > 1 GB of memory) > 3) The test program core dumps when run with the v option. > Testing MessageDigest algorithm SHA-384. > ..signal BUS (invalid address alignment) in CryptoPP::SHA512::Transform at > line 27 in file "sha.cpp" > 27 #define blk0(i) (W[i] = data[i]) > (dbx) print data > data = 0xffffffff7fffc1ec > (dbx) print i > dbx: "i" is not defined in the scope > `cryptest.exe`sha.cpp`CryptoPP::SHA512::Transform(unsigned long long*,const > unsigned long long*)` > dbx: see `help scope' for details > (dbx) where > =>[1] CryptoPP::SHA512::Transform(state = 0x1010f1980, data = > 0xffffffff7fffc1ec) (optimized), at 0x1006041a8 (line ~27) in "sha.cpp" > [2] CryptoPP::IteratedHashWithStaticTransform<unsigned long > long,CryptoPP::EnumToType<CryptoPP::ByteOrder,1>,128U,64U,CryptoPP::SHA384,48U,false>::HashEndianCorrectedBlock(this > > = 0x1010f18d0, data = 0xffffffff7fffc1ec) (optimized), at 0x1004b30b8 (line > ~89) in "iterhash.h" > [3] CryptoPP::IteratedHashBase<unsigned long > long,CryptoPP::HashTransformation>::HashMultipleBlocks(this = 0x1010f18d0, > input = 0xffffffff7fffc1ec, length = <value unavailable>) (optimized), at > 0x1005cff6c (line ~91) in "iterhash.cpp" > > The compiler options that got used were: > -DNDEBUG -g3 -xO2 -fPIC -m64 -native -KPIC -template=no%extdef -w > -erroff=wvarhidemem -erroff=voidretw > > -Andrew M. > > On Sunday, 11 September 2016 11:34:40 UTC+1, Jeffrey Walton wrote: >> >> >> >> We are at the last step of 5.6.4 release. I've uploaded a Crypto++ 5.6.4 >>> release page and linked to the release candidate. Please visit >>> https://www.cryptopp.com/release564.html. >>> >> >> Last call. If you have any concerns or objections, then please raise the. >> >> Jeff >> > -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the "Crypto++ Users" Google Group. To unsubscribe, send an email to cryptopp-users-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. More information about Crypto++ and this group is available at http://www.cryptopp.com. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Crypto++ Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cryptopp-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
