> I want to know a benchmark comparison of the HMAC(*keyed-hash message > authentication code*) variants: HMAC-SHA-1, HMAC-SHA-224, HMAC-SHA-256, > HMAC-SHA-384 and HMAC-SHA-512. > > I will use it in ad hoc case, and I want choose the right one! > > Thanks in advance. >
https://www.cryptopp.com/wiki/Gnumakefile#Running_Benchmarks If you have a Goldmont microarchitecture with the SHA extensions, then SHA-1 will run at about 3 cycles per byte; and SHA-256 will run around 4 or 5 cycles per byte. Jeff -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the "Crypto++ Users" Google Group. To unsubscribe, send an email to cryptopp-users-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. More information about Crypto++ and this group is available at http://www.cryptopp.com. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Crypto++ Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cryptopp-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
