>>>>> "n" == nusret <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
n> Ee hocam, peki ne dusunuyorsun adamin soyledikleri
n> (alintidakilere) hakkinda?
Aklima ilk geleni söyleyeyim, adamin yazdigi bana
dogrudan Worse Is Better makalesindeki New Jersey
yaklasimini hatirlatti (tam tersi degil mi, yani C ve Unix'e
atfedilen yaklasim): "Süper tasarim olmayabilir ama
calisiyor ve isimizi görüyor, daha ne..." Oysa o makalede Lisp
tarzinin bir "elmas" gibi ince ince islenmis bir "güzellik"
oldugundan dem vuruyor öyle degil mi? Sanki bir bakis
acisi ile roller tamamen farkli gibi. Ayni seye bakip
"better, diamond, perfect design" filan diyebilir
ya da farkli noktadan bakip asagidaki gibi seyler
söyleyebiliriz.
Ve belki sonucta elimizde sadece kavram karmasasi kalir.
Not: Bu CL ne deniz derya yahu, simdi de karsima
McIntire'in bir sürü islev kitapligi cikti, az
önce Debian ve Lisp e-posta listesinde cl-rsm-string diye
bir pakete dair e-posta görünce arastirdim [1]:
cl-rsm-bitcomp - Common Lisp Bit Compression Library
cl-rsm-bool-comp - Common Lisp Boolean Function Comparison Library
cl-rsm-cache - Common Lisp Cache Library
cl-rsm-delayed - Common Lisp Delayed List Library
cl-rsm-filter - Common Lisp Filter Library
cl-rsm-finance - McIntire's Common Lisp Finance Library
cl-rsm-fuzzy - McIntire's Common Lisp Fuzzy Logic Library
cl-rsm-gen-prog - McIntire's Common Lisp Genetic Programming Library
cl-rsm-genetic-alg - Common Lisp Genetic Algorithm Library
cl-rsm-memo - McIntire's Common Lisp Memoization Library
cl-rsm-mod - McIntire's Common Lisp Modular Arithmetic Library
cl-rsm-modal - McIntire's Common Lisp Modal Logic Library
cl-rsm-mpoly - McIntire's Common Lisp Multivariate Polynomial Library
cl-rsm-queue - Common Lisp Queue Library
cl-rsm-rand - McIntire's Common Lisp Discrete Random Number Library
cl-rsm-random - McIntire's Common Lisp Random Number Library
cl-rsm-rsa - McIntire's Common Lisp RSA Library
cl-rsm-string - McIntire's Common Lisp String Library
1- http://www.codecomments.com/archive274-2005-2-399694.html
n> Nusret
n> --- Emre Sevinc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Yazinin kendisi bir yana, yorumlardaki su kisim eglenceli
>> geldi:
>>
>> ,---- | Excellent insight. This actually says a lot about the
>> difference between | the Microsoft and Apple worlds.
>> |
>> | If I remember, a lot of MIT people back in the 70s broke the
>> computer | world into the Lisp and non-Lisp data typers. The
>> Lisp folk took a casual | attitude towards data structures -
>> just shove them in a list, put them on a | plist, stash them in
>> a cache. If it gets slow or confusing, add some tags and | a
>> hash algorithm. Most non-Lisp folk were appalled at this. They
>> wanted to see | the data structure design up front, the data
>> relationship dictionary, complete | and comprehensive, even
>> before any coding started. `----
>>
>>
>>
n> http://weblog.scifihifi.com/2004/12/25/data-structures-as-culture/
>>
--
Emre Sevinc
eMBA Software Developer Actively engaged in:
http://emba.bilgi.edu.tr http://ileriseviye.org
http://www.bilgi.edu.tr http://fazlamesai.net
Cognitive Science Student http://cazci.com
http://www.cogsci.boun.edu.tr
_______________________________________________
cs-lisp mailing list
cs-lisp@cs.bilgi.edu.tr
http://church.cs.bilgi.edu.tr/lcg
http://cs.bilgi.edu.tr/mailman/listinfo/cs-lisp
