-Caveat Lector-

I noticed another post of mine forwarded here, so if
this was already posted, please forgive duplication.



   DISAPPEARED NEWS - THE ORWELLIAN NIGHTMARE

   (c) (01/07/99) Ian Williams Goddard

   One of the more disturbing issues surrounding the
   TWA Flight 800 crash has been the claims made by
   some people that on the night of the crash they
   saw reports on TV that confirmed a missile hit,
   yet the reports apparently disappeared into an
   Orwellian black hole. NOW a news cameraman has
   spilled-the-beans on one of these disappeared
   TV reports, indicating that what people have
   been saying they saw on TV really was on TV.

   People have claimed they saw an interview right
   after the crash of an Air National Guard pilot as
   he stood on a tarmac in front of an aircraft where
   the pilot said the jet was hit with a missile and
   that Navy-missile exercises were being conducted
   at the time. Consistent with such an interview,
   the Long Island paper Suffolk Life reports [1]:

      "Long Island's Channel 55 cameraman James
      Hughes, said during an interview that he
      and another camera crew from one of the
      networks were at the airport when the
      C130 landed. The crew, he said, stated
      they saw a missile heading toward FL800
      just before they witnessed the explosion.
      The C130 crew members were pulled away
      from the two camera crews by what Hughes
      said appeared to be their superiors and
      came back claiming they had seen nothing."

   This not only confirms TV-witness accounts of a
   truth-leaking interview of a pilot at an airport,
   but it also clearly indicates that  the truth  was
   known that night and, with the immediate censure of
   the pilots, it also reveals that a massive cover-up
   was activated immediately, which must explain why
   the media forgot about that explosive interview.

   (The C-130 was piloted by Col. William Stratemeier.
   Major Frederick Meyer, who said he saw a meteor-like
   streak, piloted an HH-60 helicopter.  After retiring
   from the ANG, Meyer said that the first blast looked
   like "the detonation of an anti-aircraft shell."[2])

   It would seem that if military command says forget
   that news, it is forgotten and any who remember it
   and/or who believe what those pilots said they saw
   are smeared by the GovtMedia as lairs, criminals,
   or nuts... as one who might have to be locked away.
   The evidence suggests military control of society.

   Maybe that's why the same week Pierre Salinger's
   report came out CNN reported [3]: "The FBI this
   week launched a criminal investigation, hoping to
   stop missile theorists." The government of a civil
   nation does not activate "criminal investigations"
   to "STOP THEORISTS" (!!), but the U.S. Govt does!


   MORE CONFIRMATION OF PILOTS INTERVIEW

   The sudden change of the pilots story is consistent
   with a report from Aviation Week & Space Technology
   [4] that the ANG C-130 pilot "said he had seen what
   appeared to be the trail of a shoulder-fired SAM
   ending in a flash on the 747," and then in the next
   issue, Aviation Week reports that the pilot had a
   sudden change of mind, now saying: "We did not see
   smoke trails [from a missile], any ignition source
   from the tail end of a rocket nor anything..." [5]
   And the media filmed the witness intimidation [1]:

       "The C130 crew members were pulled away
       from the two camera crews by what Hughes
       said appeared to be their superiors and
       came back claiming they had seen nothing."

   Anyone capable of rational thought can see (a) that
   the military pilots were pressured to say they did
   NOT see what they'd ALREADY said they saw, and (b)
   that this is prima facie evidence of a cover-up,
   and (c) specifically, a cover-up of a missile hit.

   If X says he saw a missile hit P, and then X gets a
   talking-to by superiors, and then X says he did NOT
   see a missile hit P, one of his two statements must
   be false and it stands to reason that it's the second.

   If the media taped those pilots changing their story
   under pressure and yet forget that event and portray
   those who believe there's a cover-up as nuts & liars,
   then the media are choosing to promote the cover-up.


   THE MAJOR MEDIA: VOICE OF THE MILITARY STATE

   If the media could forget about a widely-televised
   interview of military pilots saying FL800 was hit
   by a missile, pilots who are then quickly whisked
   away by superiors only to return saying they saw
   nothing, could we trust the major media to report
   it if someone with inside information contacted
   them with a major scoop? If they'd cover-up the
   former, they should also cover-up the latter. In
   fact, when James Sanders gave CBS a patch of the
   rocket-fuel-covered seat cushion [6] so that they
   too could test it, CBS gave it to the FBI instead
   and then assisted with the FBI's efforts to jail
   Sanders by spreading FBI disinformation about him.

   So when people say there could not be such a large
   cover-up since someone would come forward, it stands
   to reason that if someone with critical evidence did
   come forward and in so doing contacted a major media
   network to get his/her story out, the network would
   contact the FBI and then forget about the incident.


   STILL MORE DISAPPEARED AND CENSORED NEWS

   Speaking of news the media ignores, last September
   the agent who headed the FBI's "investigation" said
   that the "boats" below FL800 seen on the NTSB radar
   plot that the FBI cited the Privacy Act to conceal
   the identities of, were "Navy vessels that were on
   classified maneuvers." An outright admission by the
   top FBI agent of a cover-up, and recorded on tape!
   Would that make headlines? Not one. 100% black out!
   (See http://www.erols.com/igoddard/coverup4.htm) The
   evidence indicates that the major media operate as
   a team, advancing the agenda of the military-state.

   Consistent with that hypothesis is the fact that the
   day after FBI agent James Kallstrom called Hollywood
   director Oliver Stone a "bottom-feeder" for his plan
   to interview eyewitnesses of the FL800 crash in an
   upcoming TV program looking into the missile theory,
   ABC canceled the program.  Other TV networks chimed
   in to denounce Stone's shameful effort to allow eye-
   witness accounts to evade the military black out,
   which the on-the-spot censure of the C-130 pilots
   proves went into effect on the night of the crash.

   In Closing...

   Our military-government may or may not have good
   reasons to keep the Navy maneuvers under the TWA
   800 crash classified, but we as citizens do have
   good reason to hold up the light of free inquiry
   to the darkness of military-state secrecy: secret
   government endangers truth, freedom, and democracy.

__________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
[1] SUFFOLK LIFE: Flight 800: Accident Or Terrorist
    Attack? - Part 4 Was There A Cover-up? By Joey
    Mac Lellan. December 17, 1998.
    http://www.suffolklife.com/Top%20Stories/FL800_3.html
    http://www.newsmax.com/articles/?a=1998/12/17/43518
[2] AVIATION WEEK & SPACE TECHNOLOGY: ANG Pilot: Jet Hit
    by Object. By David Fulghum, March 10, 1997.
[3] CNN admits that: "The FBI this week launched
    a criminal investigation, hoping to stop missile
    theorists." http://cnn.com/US/9703/13/twa/index.html
[4] AVIATION WEEK & SPACE TECHNOLOGY: Terrorist Fears Deepen
    With 747's Destruction. E.Phillips, P.Mann (7/22/96) p.20.
[5] AVIATION WEEK & SPACE TECHNOLOGY: ANG Eyewitnesses Reject
    Missile Theory. By David Fulghum, July 29, 1996, page 32.
[6] The Facts About the Seat Cushion J. Sanders Liberated:
http://www.accessone.com/~rivero/CRASH/TWA/GLUETESTS.html
FBI's Op: http://magnet.fsu.edu/~stalcup/synopsis3.htm

Report On Some Of The Disappeared Evidence In The TWA
800 Case: http://www.erols.com/igoddard/coverup3.htm

Recommended Site: http://www.angelfire.com/hi/TWA800


************************************************************
Visit Ian Williams Goddard  ------>  http://Ian.Goddard.net
------------------------------------------------------------
(+)  Something can come from nothing, if, and only if,  (-)
(-)  that something is equal to nothing ((-)+(+) = 0).  (+)
____________________________________________________________
"[I]n any closed universe the  negative gravitational energy
 cancels the energy of matter exactly. The total energy, or
  equivalently the total mass, is precisely equal to zero."

- + - +  Dr. Alan Guth (The Inflationary Universe)  + - + -

DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to