-Caveat Lector- > anti-Clinton is verboten. I have not posted anything pro-Clinton. His sell-out to the Chinese was more than a crime against the US, it was one against the world. The threat of the military satellite hardware he sold to the Chinese for the sake of donations to the Democrats apparently was the real reason behind India's nuclear blasts. It does, however, fall into the category of the October Surprise, where traitorous Reagan made a deal with enemy Iran in order to steal the election from Carter. We know he did it, but we can't prove it, and he will never be held accountable for it. He even repeated the pattern with Iran-contra and yet people still regard him as honorable. > "Conservative" to me means a strict interpretation of the Constitution... > something both parties ignore. Selective use of laws allows the media to be > controlled. Corporations should have their power taken away by revoking their > charters for bribing officials and officials can be recalled for accepting > bribes. Clinton takes bribes even from foreign countries hostile to the US > such as Communist China... do you deny that also? Clinton has been up front in acknowledging that presidential power does not come from the Constitution but from secret ruling elites, who work for transnational corporate interests. This is the basic premise of Carroll Quigley's Tragedy and Hope, and Clinton regarded Quigley as his mentor at Georgetown, quoted him at the Democratic con. Secret elites and corporatism have not ordinarily been defined as the "left." > Again trying to change the subject. Reagan and Bush are no longer in office, > you cannot impeach them. However, if Clinton is impeached for his drug > involvement and bribe taking... this may open the door for cleaning out all of > Congress to include the "Evil Republicans" why can't you see that? I'm with you on this, Bob. Impeach the son of a bitch. In fact, as Christopher Hitchens (a "leftist") says, cuff him and take him downtown. But it's not gonna happen. Clinton has the same protection as his pals Reagan and Bush. > Bush may have talked about the NWO, but Clinton is ushering it in with a red > carpet, our money, and soon our blood. All at the behest of Bush, who Clinton covered up for at Mena, whose sons now run Texas and Florida, whose oil American blood will be shed over. That's not just talk. kt DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
