-Caveat Lector-
>From alt.mindcontrol.
Enjoy
Teo1000
Subject: Re: McMartin Preschool Case
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alex Constantine)
Date: 3/11/99 5:09 PM Eastern Standard Time
Message-id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
John Price wrote:
>Bullshit. It was the most expensive trial of its kind, if not of all time
>(maybe Ng's is more so) in CA history.
John: I was referring to the REPORT, Mr. Price. This is why you are not
a PhD, as you so fatuously claim � words don't register with you.
The report has been met with flagrant lies and cover stories from
you and other hand-puppets of satanist Michael Aquino, whom you've
dissembled about in the past to protect. Your reasoning: If people
understand McMartin, they will understand that Michael Aquino was
guilty of aggravated child molestation, as the Army concluded when
Aquino was chucked out of the military. Apathy allows your pal Aquino
to go unpunished, and apathy is the reason no publisher has offered
to put out the tunnel report, which, despite your false claims, supports
the children.
By the way, Charles Ng was a satanist, like your pal Michael Aquino,
who has a curious connection to Ng. I'll discuss this in future posts.
>There are no tunnels. See the forensic geologist's report (from the
>Stickel report) and the DA's paperwork (parents' planted turtles) on my
>FTP site in the directory:
ftp://ftp.calweb.com/users/j/jmprice/sra/
The complete report puts your carefully-chosen extracts and
false claims into perspective. Unfortunately, it hasn't been published �
yet. But what can one expect from an ally of the Temple of Set.
Anyone who has read the whole report is aware that you are plying
misleading tactics here. The report PROVES that there were tunnels
beneath the school, and carbon-dating and other tests demonstrated
that the tunnels were dug at about the same time Charles Buckey,
then a Hughes employee, built the McMartin school for toddlers, who
were indeed ritually abused, as were the children at Presidion, by
your buddy Aquino and a teacher at the school who died mysteriously
after the scandal broke in San Francisco.
>Stickel wanted money for it. Some $7,000 IIRC, but that *amount* is
>likely just rumor.
The five independent geologists who verified the existence of tunnels
beneath the preschool were paid by the parents for their services.
Stickel does not own the report, and so he can't ask a penny for it.
The parents paid for the rights, and it was a minimal sum.
Why are you repeating "rumors," i.e. the lies of your own camp of
FMSF-style propagandists.
>He was, or the group was, demanding money for its
>publication.
This is absolutely false. Stickel, as I've explained, does not own the
report. The parents do. Stickel did his work, sold his report, and has no
claim on how it is used, again, by the parents.
>No professional archaeologist would ask for money for the
>report. They would have fees involved in the research, as would any
>professional, but that's it.
And this is precisely how it happened. He was paid by the parents
who retained his services. The parents of the children also paid for the
forensic lab results, which also support the allegations of the children.
>And note that the forensic geologist, being sympathetic to the situation,
>did not charge any fees at all.
Dr. Stickel did not start out sympathetic to the children. He stated
openly he did not believe them. But after he found and mapped the
tunnels, he changed his tune. I know this after extensive talks with the
parents. The dig cost the parents an excess of $20,000 out of their
own pockets. Stickel DID charge them. I have copies of the receipts.
You are lying agian, John, but I'm used to it. It's your job.
>Alex Constantine, Fact Free at All Costs!
John Price defends organized pedophiles at all costs. Visit the
sci.psychology.psychotherapy for the facts about John Price and friends.
It isn't pretty.
� Alex Constantine
--
John M. Price, PhD [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Life: Chemistry, but with feeling! | PGP Key on request or by finger!
Email responses to my Usenet articles will be posted at my discretion.
Comoderator: sci.psychology.psychotherapy.moderated Atheist# 683
If a man speaks in the forest, and there's no woman there to hear
him, is he still wrong?
- Joe Hopke
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance�not soapboxing! These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
