-Caveat Lector- > >-----Original Message----- >From: Mike Ruppert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Date: Monday, April 12, 1999 11:17 AM >Subject: [CIA-DRUGS] Re: CIA-DOJ Case: Cracks opening wider, dayling >shinging in! > > >>From: "Mike Ruppert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >>Hey Everybody - slow down! >> >>This effort at downward departure has already failed and it would never >have >>succeeded anyway. Almost two years ago in 1997 I was subpoenaed as an >Expert >>Witness in the L.A. case of the U.S. v Edward Hodge on just the same >tactic. >>I have given expert testimony on narcotics and dangerous drugs twenty-seven >>time in state and local courts and I am an expert on CIA involvement. >> >>The Judge, Robert Takasugi, after six or seven continuances, and after the >>government flew in a senior U.S. attorney from Washington, gave the >>defendant a six point reduction in an apparent deal to not call me to the >>stand. >> >>The courts don't have to do anything they don't want to. I had a discussion >>with several attorneys after this message first appeared and it was obvious >>that this particular attorney had a paying client, a real drug dealer, and >>he ran up his bill niceley. >> >>We all must be judicious about what we spend our energy on. These lists and >>our activities, as we grow successful, will attract hundreds of >>disinformation messages designed to fragment our focus and energy. >Someone's >>got to be mature enough to check stuff out before we trumpet things as the >>answer to our prayers. >> >>That only breeds additional disappointment. >> >>Case in point: The current lunacy based on the Media Bypass article and a >>four year old Supreme Court decision. >> >>Mike Ruppert >> >>-----Original Message----- >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >>Sent: Monday, April 12, 1999 8:54 AM >>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Subject: [CIA-DRUGS] Re: CIA-DOJ Case: Cracks opening wider, dayling >>shinging in! >> >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >>The article, "CIA Complicity..." is very interesting, however, if I may >make >>a worthwhile suggestion, I have often wondered why some lawyer don't use as >>a >>defense to any big drug defense case that fact that there exists in this >>Country today, a DOUBLE STANDARD OF JUSTICE, one for me and you, and one >for >>all of the thugs that are selling dope under the guise of they being the >>"Government." Also, that to prosecute even one drug case the second >defense >>kicks in also, and that is SELECTIVE PROSECUTION. This means that they >>selected the person that they wanted to prosecute over the others, the >thugs >>that are selling it, ostensibly claiming that because they are a Mafioso >>clown that they have an immunity to prosecution by virtue of the fact that >>they are doing it under color of law, but strictly in violation of the law. >>Now, if any lawyer had the guts and ability to use these two defenses >>effectively it would become an effective defense to any drug case >>prosecution. There is an abundance of case law that selective prosecution >>is >>a defense to any prosecution. Also, it is likewise a defense to operate a >>double standard of justice, one set of laws for one set of people like in >>Kosovo. These two defenses are powerful and if developed and presented >>right >>would throw a monkey wrench into the thug's mechanism. >>Now, we have the problem like in many states, that you are not going to >find >>a lawyer that has the guts and ability to take on the murderous thugs. It >>is >>essential to this kind of defense that one put on proof of the >>"government's" >>drug operation, like here, where I live and elsewhere where cocaine or >crack >>is sold on the side of the street under the supervision of the local law >>enforcement. By calling these law enforcement people, enough of them to >>catch them in their lies, and presenting proof that they are selling it, >>permitting it, and covering it up, how could one loose? I hope that this >>gets the ball rolling and gets the "government" dope dealers in jail, and >>their playhouse torn up. How much profit do they make a year, I read where >>it is 114 BILLION dollars per year. Where does this money go and who gets >>it? People, we need to do some homework. >>Oscar B. Ladner >> >>------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>Share the wealth! >>http://www.ONElist.com >>Tell a friend about ONElist's 115,000 free e-mail communities! >> >> >>------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>Looking to expand your world? >>http://www.ONElist.com >>ONElist has over 115,000 e-mail communities from which to chose! >> > DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic screeds are not allowed. Substance�not soapboxing! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at: http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
