-Caveat Lector-

http://truthout.org/docs_03/030603B.shtml


     Editor's Note: This is a massive story internationally, and
     yet there has been virtually no coverage of it here in the States.
     - wrp

          US Refuses to Comment on Report of 'Dirty Tricks' to Win UN
          Vote on Iraq
          by the Agence France Presse
          Tuesday 4 March 2003

          The United States steadfastly refused to comment on a report
     it is waging a secret "dirty tricks" campaign against UN Security
     Council members to win votes for a resolution opening the way for
     war against Iraq.

          Neither the White House nor the State Department would be
     drawn into making any statement on the report in London's Observer
     newspaper that said it had obtained a document detailing US
     surveillance of the home and office telephones and e-mails of UN
     delegates.

          "The administration never comments on anything involving any
     people involved in intelligence," White House spokesman Ari
     Fleischer said. "The administration does not answer questions of
     that nature."

          At the State Department, spokesman Richard Boucher repeatedly
     declined to respond to questions about the report and stayed mum
     even when asked if he could deny it.

          "It doesn't matter what the paper is or whether it's true or
     not, I wouldn't have any comment on that kind of allegation," he
     told reporters.

          "I would not have any comment whatsoever on that kind of
     question or allegation because we never comment on intelligence
     matters, and I'm not going to do it now," Boucher said.

          The paper said the disclosures were made in a memorandum
     written by a top official at the National Security Agency (NSA),
     the US body which intercepts communications around the world, and
     circulated to senior agents in his organization and to a friendly
     foreign intelligence agency.

          The memo describes orders to staff at the agency to step up
     surveillance "particularly directed at ... UN Security Council
     members" to provide up-to-the-minute intelligence on the voting
     intentions of UN members regarding the issue of Iraq, according to
     the Observer.

          The leaked memorandum, dated January 31, makes clear that the
     target of the heightened surveillance efforts are the delegations
     from Angola, Cameroon, Chile, Mexico, Guinea and Pakistan at the UN
     headquarters in New York, it said.

          Along with Spain and the United States, Britain has sponsored
     a new UN resolution declaring Iraq in non-compliance with earlier
     UN demands that it disarm, which would in effect authorize the use
     of force against the Baghdad regime.

          The resolution needs nine votes to pass while avoiding a veto
     by any of the five permanent members, and Britain and the US are
     lobbying feverishly for support.

          The votes of the so-called "middle six" delegations are being
     fought over by the pro-war party, led by the US and Britain, and
     the party arguing for more time for UN inspections in Iraq, led by
     France, China and Russia.

          Chile's foreign minister Soledad Alvear ordered Chile's
     embassy in London to look into The Observer's claims after meeting
     with Chile's UN Ambassador Juan Gabriel Valdes and Chilean
     President Ricardo Lagos.

          (In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material
     is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior
     interest in receiving the included information for research and
     educational purposes.)

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http://archive.jab.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http://archive.jab.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to