| -Caveat Lector-
More likely they say that to put it in the budget
and then look good for having a surplus.
They haven't rebuilt anything in Afghanistan except
for a pipeline that wasn't built to begin with.
Any rebuilding done in Iraq with be entirely in the
energy sector. I simply do not believe that
the money will be spent on anything of real benefit
to the only true victims in this: civilian Iraqis.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 6:10
PM
Subject: [CTRL] CFR: Iraq Reconstruction
Could Cost $20 Billion/Year...
-Caveat Lector- http://www.cnn.com/2003/ALLPOLITICS/03/12/sprj.irq.costs/index.html
Report:
Reconstruction in Iraq could cost up to $20 billion a year
Think
tank says American support critical to mission
From David Ensor
CNN
Washington Bureau
Wednesday, March 12, 2003 Posted: 2:43 PM EST (1943
GMT)
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Stabilization and reconstruction
efforts in Iraq could cost up to $20 billion a year for several years,
according to a report released Wednesday by a think tank.
The
report from the Council on Foreign Relations urged President Bush to "make
clear" the U.S. intention to "stay the course" in any post-war operation and
win the support of the American public for such an endeavor.
The
council -- comprised of experts from the government, the military and academia
-- based its estimate on an assumed deployment of around 75,000 troops
throughout a post-war period.
"Winning the peace is task number two,"
said retired Gen. Gordon Sullivan, a member of the task force that drafted the
report, "Iraq: the Day After." Sullivan described a military victory in Iraq
as the first goal.
The report says the president "should announce a
multibillion dollar, multiyear post-conflict reconstruction program and seek
formal congressional endorsement."
That program should commit at least
$3 billion a year to the reconstruction of Iraq, the report says, in addition
to the estimated $17 billion-a-year cost of 75,000 troops.
The report
called on Bush to stress two messages: Explain the United States' vital
interest in Iraq's future to the American people, so they will be willing to
bear the cost of reconstruction; and to make the public commitment, so Iraqis
understand the United States will not walk out before job is done.
Task force co-chairmen Thomas Pickering -- who served in the Clinton
administration-- and James Schlesinger -- who served in the Nixon and Ford
administrations -- said at a news conference that Americans should not assume
Iraq's oil wealth will be available in the early years to help pay for Iraq's
reconstruction.
"In the early years, oil revenues will be
insufficient," Schlesinger said, noting that Iraq's oil infrastructure is in
dire need of refurbishing and that the country's oil revenues are committed to
supplying food and essentials.
The report also says that if the United
States has to keep more than 75,000 troops in Iraq, which it calls "a genuine
possibility," then the funding requirement "would be much greater" than $20
billion a year.
The Bush administration has refused to publicly say
how much it thinks a war or reconstruction effort would cost in Iraq. Some
administration sources say the White House is likely to ask Congress for
between $60 and $95 billion to pay for a war and reconstruction.
Various administration figures have said there are too many variables
to make such an estimate worthwhile. The lack of any number has frustrated
many lawmakers, particularly Democrats, who say the U.S. public has a right to
know what a war and cleanup operation in Iraq would cost.
<A
HREF="">www.ctrl.org</A> DECLARATION &
DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list.
Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not
soap-boxing—please! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its
many half-truths, mis- directions and outright frauds—is used politically by
different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum
of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity
of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives
no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html <A
HREF="">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>
http://archive.jab.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ <A
HREF="">ctrl</A>
======================================================================== To
subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL
[to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF
CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
<A HREF="">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
<A HREF="">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>
http://archive.jab.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
<A HREF="">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
|
