-Caveat Lector-

http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,923831,00.html
Spectre orange

Nearly 30 years after the Vietnam war, a chemical weapon used by US
troops is still exacting a hideous toll on each new generation. Cathy Scott-
Clark and Adrian Levy report

Cathy Scott-Clark and Adrian Levy
Saturday March 29, 2003
The Guardian

Hong Hanh is falling to pieces. She has been poisoned by the most toxic
molecule known to science; it was sprayed during a prolonged military
campaign. The contamination persists. No redress has been offered, no
compensation. The superpower that spread the toxin has done nothing to
combat the medical and environmental catastrophe that is overwhelming
her country. This is not northern Iraq, where Saddam Hussein gassed 5,000
Kurds in 1988. Nor the trenches of first world war France. Hong Hanh's
story, and that of many more like her, is quietly unfolding in Vietnam
today. Her declining half-life is spent unseen, in her home, an
unremarkable concrete box in Ho Chi Minh City, filled with photographs,
family plaques and yellow enamel stars, a place where the best is made of
the worst.

Hong Hanh is both surprising and terrifying. Here is a 19-year-old who lives
in a 10-year-old's body. She clatters around with disjointed spidery strides
which leave her soaked in sweat. When she cannot stop crying, soothing
creams and iodine are rubbed into her back, which is a lunar collage of
septic blisters and scabs. "My daughter is dying," her mother says. "My
youngest daughter is 11 and she has the same symptoms. What should we
do? Their fingers and toes stick together before they drop off. Their hands
wear down to stumps. Every day they lose a little more skin. And this is not
leprosy. The doctors say it is connected to American chemical weapons
we were exposed to during the Vietnam war."

There are an estimated 650,000 like Hong Hanh in Vietnam, suffering from
an array of baffling chronic conditions. Another 500,000 have already died.
The thread that weaves through all their case histories is defoliants
deployed by the US military during the war. Some of the victims are
veterans who were doused in these chemicals during the war, others are
farmers who lived off land that was sprayed. The second generation are
the sons and daughters of war veterans, or children born to parents who
lived on contaminated land. Now there is a third generation, the
grandchildren of the war and its victims.

This is a chain of events bitterly denied by the US government. Millions of
litres of defoliants such as Agent Orange were dropped on Vietnam, but US
government scientists claimed that these chemicals were harmless to
humans and short-lived in the environment. US strategists argue that Agent
Orange was a prototype smart weapon, a benign tactical herbicide that
saved many hundreds of thousands of American lives by denying the North
Vietnamese army the jungle cover that allowed it ruthlessly to strike and
feint. New scientific research, however, confirms what the Vietnamese
have been claiming for years. It also portrays the US government as one
that has illicitly used weapons of mass destruction, stymied all
independent efforts to assess the impact of their deployment, failed to
acknowledge cold, hard evidence of maiming and slaughter, and pursued a
policy of evasion and deception.

Teams of international scientists working in Vietnam have now discovered
that Agent Orange contains one of the most virulent poisons known to
man, a strain of dioxin called TCCD which, 28 years after the fighting
ended, remains in the soil, continuing to destroy the lives of those
exposed to it. Evidence has also emerged that the US government not only
knew that Agent Orange was contaminated, but was fully aware of the
killing power of its contaminant dioxin, and yet still continued to use the
herbicide in Vietnam for 10 years of the war and in concentrations that
exceeded its own guidelines by 25 times. As well as spraying the North
Vietnamese, the US doused its own troops stationed in the jungle, rather
than lose tactical advantage by having them withdraw.

On February 5, addressing the UN Security Council, secretary of state
Colin Powell, now famously, clutched between his fingers a tiny phial
representing concentrated anthrax spores, enough to kill thousands, and
only a tiny fraction of the amount he said Saddam Hussein had at his
disposal.

The Vietnamese government has its own symbolic phial that it, too,
flourishes, in scientific conferences that get little publicity. It contains 80g
of TCCD, just enough of the super-toxin contained in Agent Orange to fill a
child-size talcum powder container. If dropped into the water supply of a
city the size of New York, it would kill the entire population. Ground-
breaking research by Dr Arthur H Westing, former director of the UN
Environment Programme, a leading authority on Agent Orange, reveals that
the US sprayed 170kg of it over Vietnam.

John F Kennedy's presidential victory in 1961 was propelled by an image of
the New Frontier. He called on Americans to "bear the burden of a long
twilight struggle ... against the common enemies of man: tyranny, poverty,
disease, and war itself." But one of the most problematic new frontiers,
that dividing North and South Vietnam, flared up immediately after he had
taken office, forcing him to bolster the US-backed regime in Saigon.
Kennedy examined "tricks and gadgets" that might give the South an edge
in the jungle, and in November 1961 sanctioned the use of defoliants in a
covert operation code-named Ranch Hand, every mission flown signed off
by the president himself and managed in Saigon by the secret Committee
202 - the call sign for defoliating forests being "20" and for spraying fields
"2".

Ngo Luc, 67, was serving with a North Vietnamese guerrilla unit in the
Central Highlands when he saw planes circling overhead. "We expected
bombs, but a fine yellow mist descended, covering absolutely everything,"
he says. "We were soaked in it, but it didn't worry us, as it smelled good.
We continued to crawl through the jungle. The next day the leaves wilted
and within a week the jungle was bald. We felt just fine at the time."
Today, the former captain is the sole survivor from his unit and lives with
his two granddaughters, both born partially paralysed, near the central
Vietnamese city of Hue.

When US troops became directly embroiled in Vietnam in 1964, the
Pentagon signed contracts worth $57m (£36m) with eight US chemical
companies to produce defoliants, including Agent Orange, named after the
coloured band painted around the barrels in which it was shipped. The US
would target the Ho Chi Minh trail - Viet Cong supply lines made invisible
by the jungle canopy along the border with Laos - as well as the heavily
wooded Demilitarised Zone (DMZ) that separated the North from the
South, and also the Mekong Delta, a maze of overgrown swamps and inlets
that was a haven for communist insurgents.

A reporter for the St Louis Dispatch witnessed a secret spraying mission
and wrote that the US was dropping "poison". Congressman Robert
Kastenmeier demanded that the president abandon "chemical warfare"
because it tainted America's reputation. Instead, William Bundy, a
presidential adviser, flatly denied that the herbicide used by America was a
chemical weapon, and blamed communist propagandists for a distortion of
the facts about the Ranch Hand operation. Only when the Federation of
American Scientists warned that year that Vietnam was being used as a
laboratory experiment did the rumours become irrefutable. More than
5,000 American scientists, including 17 Nobel laureates and 129 members of
the Academy of Sciences, signed a petition against "chemical and biological
weapons used in Vietnam".

Eight years after the military launched Operation Ranch Hand, scientists
from the National Institute of Health warned that laboratory mice exposed
to Agent Orange were giving birth to stillborn or deformed litters, a
conclusion reinforced by research conducted by the US department of
agriculture. These findings coincided with newspaper reports in Hanoi that
blamed Agent Orange for a range of crippling conditions among troops and
their families. Dr Le Ke Son, a young conscript in Hanoi during the war and
now director of Vietnam's Agent Orange Victims Fund, recalls, "The
government proposed that a line of runners carry blood and tissue samples
from the front to Hanoi. But it was more than 500 miles and took two
months, by which time the samples were spoiled. How could we make the
research work? There was no way to prove what we could see with our
own eyes."

In December 1969, President Nixon made a radical and controversial pledge
that America would never use chemical weapons in a first strike. He made
no mention of Vietnam or Agent Orange, and the US government
continued dispatching supplies of herbicides to the South Vietnamese
regime until 1974.

That year, Kiem was born in a one-room hut in Kim Doi, a village just
outside Hue. For her mother, Nguyen, she should have been a consolation
because her husband, a Viet Cong soldier, had been killed several months
earlier. "The last time he came home, he told me about the spray, how his
unit had been doused in a sweet-smelling mist and all the leaves had fallen
from the trees," Nguyen says. It soon became obvious that Kiem was
severely mentally and physically disabled. "She can eat, she can smile, she
sits on the bed. That's it. I have barely left my home since my daughter was
born."

By the time the war finally ended in 1975, more than 10% of Vietnam had
been intensively sprayed with 72 million litres of chemicals, of which 66%
was Agent Orange, laced with its super-strain of toxic TCCD. But even
these figures, contained in recently declassified US military records, vastly
underestimate the true scale of the spraying. In confidential statements
made to US scientists, former Ranch Hand pilots allege that, in addition to
the recorded missions, there were 26,000 aborted operations during which
260,000 gallons of herbicide were dumped. US military regulations required
all spray planes or helicopters to return to base empty and one pilot,
formerly stationed at Bien Hoa air base between 1968 and 1969, claims that
he regularly jettisoned his chemical load into the Long Binh reservoir.
"These herbicides should never have been used in the way that they were
used," says the pilot, who has asked not to be identified.

Almost immediately after the war finished, US veterans began reporting
chronic conditions, skin disorders, asthma, cancers, gastrointestinal
diseases. Their babies were born limbless or with Down's syndrome and
spina bifida. But it would be three years before the US department of
veterans' affairs reluctantly agreed to back a medical investigation,
examining 300,000 former servicemen - only a fraction of those who had
complained of being sick - with the government warning all participants
that it was indemnified from lawsuits brought by them. When rumours
began circulating that President Reagan had told scientists not to make
"any link" between Agent Orange and the deteriorating health of veterans,
the victims lost patience with their government and sued the defoliant
manufacturers in an action that was finally settled out of court in 1984 for
$180m (£115m).

It would take the intervention of the former commander of the US Navy in
Vietnam, Admiral Elmo Zumwalt, for the government finally to admit that it
had been aware of the potential dangers of the chemicals used in Vietnam
from the start of Ranch Hand. The admiral's involvement stemmed from a
deathbed pledge to his son, a patrol boat captain who contracted two
forms of cancer that he believed had been caused by his exposure to
Agent Orange. Every day during the war, Captain Elmo Zumwalt Jr had
swum in a river from which he had also eaten fish, in an area that was
regularly sprayed with the herbicide. Two years after his son's death in
1988, Zumwalt used his leverage within the military establishment to
compile a classified report, which he presented to the secretary of the
department of veterans' affairs and which contained data linking Agent
Orange to 28 life-threatening conditions, including bone cancer, skin
cancer, brain cancer - in fact, almost every cancer known to man - in
addition to chronic skin disorders, birth defects, gastrointestinal diseases
and neurological defects.

Zumwalt also uncovered irrefutable evidence that the US military had
dispensed "Agent Orange in concentrations six to 25 times the suggested
rate" and that "4.2m US soldiers could have made transient or significant
contact with the herbicides because of Operation Ranch Hand". This
speculative figure is twice the official estimate of US veterans who may
have been contaminated with TCCD.

Most damning and politically sensitive of all is a letter, obtained by
Zumwalt, from Dr James Clary, a military scientist who designed the spray
tanks for Ranch Hand. Writing in 1988 to a member of Congress
investigating Agent Orange, Clary admitted: "When we initiated the
herbicide programme in the 1960s, we were aware of the potential for
damage due to dioxin contamination in the herbicide. We were even aware
that the military formulation had a higher dioxin concentration than the
civilian version, due to the lower cost and speed of manufacture.
However, because the material was to be used on the enemy, none of us
were overly concerned."

The Office of Genetic Counselling and Disabled Children (OGCDC) operates
out of a room little bigger than a broom cupboard. Dr Viet Nhan and his 21
volunteers share their cramped quarters at Hue Medical College with
cerebral spinal fluid shunt kits donated from Norfolk, Virginia; children's
clothes given by the Rotary Club of Osaka, Japan; second-hand computers
scavenged from banks in Singapore.

Vietnam's chaotic and underfunded national health service cannot cope
with the demands made upon it. The Vietnamese Red Cross has registered
an estimated one million people disabled by Agent Orange, but has
sufficient funds to help only one fifth of them, paying out an average of $5
(£3) a month. Dr Nhan established the free OGCDC, having studied the
impact of Agent Orange as a student, to match Vietnamese families to
foreign private financial donors. "It was only when I went out to the
villages looking for case studies that I realised how many families were
affected and how few could afford help," he says. "I abandoned my
research. Children need to run before they die."

The walls of his room are plastered with bewildering photographs of those
he has helped: operations for hernias and cleft palates, open-heart
surgery and kidney transplants. All of the patients come from isolated
districts in central Vietnam, villages whose names will be unfamiliar, unlike
the locations that surround them: Khe Sanh, Hamburger Hill, Camp Carroll
and the Rock Pile. "I am not interested in apportioning blame," Nhan says.
"I don't want to talk to you about science or politics. What I care about is
that I have 60 sick children needing financial backers. They cannot wait for
the US to change its policy, take its head out of the sand and clear up the
mess."

He takes us into an intensive care ward to meet nine-year-old Nguyen Van
Tan, who two weeks before had open- heart surgery to correct a birth
defect thought to be connected to dioxin poisoning. There is no hard
proof of this, but his father, who sits beside the bed, talks of being
sprayed with defoliants when he fought with the Viet Cong. The area they
live in was repeatedly doused during the war. Almost all of his former
battlefield comrades have disabled children, he says. Nhan ushers us away.
"I don't want to tell the family yet, but their boy will never fully recover.
He is already suffering from total paralysis. The most we can do now is
send them home with a little money."

Back in his tiny office, the doctor gestures to photocopies of US Air Force
maps, sent by a veterans' organisation because the US government refuses
to supply them. These dizzying charts depict the number of herbicide
missions carried out over Quang Tri, a province adjacent to the DMZ, from
where almost all Nhan's patients come. Its topography is obliterated by
spray lines, 741,143 gallons of chemicals dropped here, more than 600,000
of them being Agent Orange. "I'm just scratching the surface," he says.

The Vietnamese government is reluctant to let us travel to Quang Tri
province. It does not want us "to poke and prod" already dismal villagers,
treating them as if they are medical exhibits. We attempt to recruit some
high-powered support and arrange a meeting in Hanoi with Madame
Nguyen Thi Binh, who until last year was the vice-president of Vietnam.
She receives us at the presidential palace in a teak-panelled hall beneath
an enormous photograph of Ho Chi Minh in a gold frame writhing with
dragons. "Thank you, my young friends, for your interest in Vietnam,"
Madame Binh says, straightening her grey silk ao dai, a traditional flowing
trouser suit.

She looks genteel, but old photographs of her in olive fatigues suggest she
is a seasoned campaigner. As minister of foreign affairs for the Provisional
Revolutionary South Vietnamese government, she negotiated at the Paris
peace talks in 1973. "I must warn you, I will not answer questions about
George W Bush," she says, casting a steely gaze, perhaps conscious of the
fact that, since the lifting of the US economic embargo in 1994, trade with
America has grown to £650m a year. Madame Binh does, however, want to
talk about chemical warfare, recalling how, when she returned after the
war to her home province of Quang Nam, a lush region south-west of Hue
which was drenched in defoliants, she found "no sign of life, just rubble
and grass". She says: "All of our returning veterans had a burning desire for
children to repopulate our devastated country. When the first child was
born with a birth defect, they tried again and again. So many families now
have four or five disabled children, raising them without any hope."

What should the US do? Madame Binh laughs. "It's very late to do anything.
We put this issue directly on the table with the US. So far they have not
dealt with the problem. If our relationship is ever to be normal, the US has
to accept responsibility. Go and see the situation for yourself."

She sends us back to Hue. Over chilled water and tangerines, we talk to a
suspicious party secretary who asks us why we have bothered to come
after all these years. "There is no point," he says. "Nothing will come of
it." But he opens his file all the same and reads aloud: "In Hue city there
are 6,633 households affected by Agent Orange and in them 3,708 sick
children under the age of 16." He eventually agrees to take us north-west,
over the Perfume river, beyond the ancient royal tombs that circle this
former imperial city, towards the DMZ. We arrive at a distant commune
where a handyman is sprucing up a bust of Ho Chi Minh with white gloss
paint. Eventually, the chairman of the People's Committee of Dang Ha joins
us, and our political charabanc stuffed with seven officials sets out across
the green and gold countryside, along crisscrossing lanes. The chairman
tells us proudly how he was born on January 31 1968, the night of the Tet
offensive, the turning point of the war, when the Viet Cong launched its
assault on US positions. By the time we stop, we are all the best of friends
and, holding hands, he pulls us into the home of the Pham family, where a
wall of neighbours and an assembly of local dignitaries dressed in shiny,
double-breasted jackets stare grimly at a moaning child. He lies on a mat
on the floor, his matchstick limbs folded uselessly before him, his parents
taking it in turns to mop his mouth, as if without them he would drown in
his own saliva.

Hoi, the boy's mother, tells us how she met her husband when they were
assigned to the same Viet Cong unit in which they fought together for 10
years. But she alone was ordered to the battle of Troung Hon mountain. "I
saw this powder falling from the sky," she says. "I felt sick, had a headache.
I was sent to a field hospital. I was close to the gates of hell. By the time I
was discharged, I had lost the strength in my legs and they have never fully
recovered. Then Ky was born, our son, with yellow skin. Every year his
problems get worse." Her husband, Hung, interrupts: "Sometimes, we have
been so desperate for money that we have begged in the local market. I
do not think you can imagine the humiliation of that."

And this family is not alone. All the adults here, cycling past us or strolling
along the dykes, are suffering from skin lesions and goitres that cling to
necks like sagging balloons. The women spontaneously abort or give birth
to genderless squabs that horrify even the most experienced midwives. In
a yard, Nguyen, a neighbour's child, stares into space. He has a
hydrocephalic head as large as a melon. Two houses down, Tan has
distended eyes that bubble from his face. By the river, Ngoc is sleeping, so
wan he resembles a pressed flower. "They told me the boy is depressed,"
his exhausted father tells us. "Of course he's depressed. He lives with
disease and death."

This is not a specially constructed ghetto used to wage a propaganda war
against imperialism. The Socialist Republic of Vietnam has long embraced
the free market. This is an ordinary hamlet where, in these new liberal
times, villagers like to argue about the English Premiership football results
over a glass of home-brewed rice beer. Here live three generations
affected by Agent Orange: veterans who were sprayed during the war and
their successors who inherited the contamination or who still farm on land
that was sprayed. Vietnam's impoverished scientific community is now
trying to determine if there will be a fourth generation. "How long will this
go on?" asks Dr Tran Manh Hung, the ministry of health's leading
researcher.

Dr Hung is now working with a team of Canadian environmental scientists,
Hatfield Consultants, and they have made an alarming discovery. In the
Aluoi Valley, adjacent to the Ho Chi Minh trail, once home to three US
Special Forces bases, a region where Agent Orange was both stored and
sprayed, the scientists' analysis has shown that, rather than naturally
disperse, the dioxin has remained in the ground in concentrations 100
times above the safety levels for agricultural land in Canada. It has spread
into Aluoi's ponds, rivers and irrigation supplies, from where it has passed
into the food chain, through fish and freshwater shellfish, chicken and
ducks that store TCCD in fatty tissue. Samples of human blood and breast
milk reveal that villagers have ingested the invisible toxin and that pregnant
women pass it through the placenta to the foetus and then through their
breast milk, doubly infecting newborn babies. Is it, then, a coincidence
that in this minuscule region of Vietnam, more than 15,000 children and
adults have already been registered as suffering from the usual array of
chronic conditions?

"We theorise that the Aluoi Valley is a microcosm of the country, where
numerous reservoirs of TCCD still exist in the soil of former US military
installations," says Dr Wayne Dwernychuk, vice-president of Hatfield
Consultants. There may be as many as 50 of these "hot spots", including
one at the former US military base of Bien Hoa, where, according to
declassified defence department documents, US forces spilled 7,500
gallons of Agent Orange on March 1 1970. Dr Arnold Schecter, a leading
expert in dioxin contamination in the US, sampled the soil there and found
it to contain TCCD levels that were 180 million times above the safe level
set by the US environmental protection agency.

It is extremely difficult to decontaminate humans or the soil. A World
Health Organisation briefing paper warns: "Once TCCD has entered the
body it is there to stay due to its uncanny ability to dissolve in fats and to
its rock solid chemical stability." At Aluoi, the researchers recommended
the immediate evacuation of the worst affected villages, but to be certain
of containing this hot spot, the WHO also recommends searing the land
with temperatures of more than 1,000C, or encasing it in concrete before
treating it chemically.

At home, the US takes heed. When a dump at the Robins Air Force Base in
Georgia was found to have stored Agent Orange, it was placed on a
National Priority List, immediately capped in five feet of clay and sand, and
has since been the subject of seven investigations. Dioxin is now also a
major domestic concern, scientists having discovered that it is a by-
product of many ordinary industrial processes, including smelting, the
bleaching of paper pulp and solid waste incineration. The US
environmental protection agency, pressed into a 12-year inquiry, recently
concluded that it is a "class-1 human carcinogen".

The evidence is categoric. Last April, a conference at Yale University
attended by the world's leading environmental scientists, who reviewed
the latest research, concluded that in Vietnam the US had conducted the
"largest chemical warfare campaign in history". And yet no money is
forthcoming, no aid in kind. For the US, there has only ever been one
contemporary incident of note involving weapons of mass destruction -
Colin Powell told the UN Security Council in February that, "in the history
of chemical warfare, no country has had more battlefield experience with
chemical weapons since world war one than Saddam Hussein's Iraq".

The US government has yet to respond to the Hatfield Consultants' report,
which finally explains why the Vietnamese are still dying so many years
after the war is over, but, last March, it did make its first contribution to
the debate in Vietnam. It signed an agreement with a reluctant Vietnamese
government for an $850,000 (£543,000) programme to "fill identified data
gaps" in the study of Agent Orange. The conference in Hanoi that
announced the decision, according to Vietnamese Red Cross
representatives who attended, ate up a large slice of this funding. One of
the signatories is the same US environmental protection agency that has
already concluded that dioxin causes cancer.

"Studies can be proposed until hell freezes over," says Dr Dwernychuk of
Hatfield Consultants, "but they are not going to assist the Vietnamese in a
humanitarian sense one iota. We state emphatically that no additional
research on human health is required to facilitate intervention or to
protect the local citizens."

There is cash to be lavished in Vietnam when the US government sees it as
politically expedient. Over the past 10 years, more than $350m (£223m) has
been spent on chasing ghosts. In 1992, the US launched the Joint Task
Force-Full Accounting to locate 2,267 servicemen thought to be missing in
action in Vietnam, Cambodia and Laos. Jerry O'Hara, spokesman for JTF-FA,
which is still searching for the remains of 1,889 of them, told us, "We don't
place a monetary value on what we do and we'll be here until we have
brought all of the boys back home."

So it is that America continues to spend considerably more on the dead
than it does on the millions of living and long-suffering - be they back home
or in Vietnam.

The science of chemical warfare fills a silent, white-tiled room at Tu Du
hospital in Ho Chi Minh City. Here, shelves are overburdened with research
materials. Behind the locked door is an iridescent wall of the mutated and
misshapen, hundreds of bell jars and vacuum-sealed bottles in which
human foetuses float in formaldehyde. Some appear to be sleeping, fingers
curling their hair, thumbs pressing at their lips, while others with multiple
heads and mangled limbs are listless and slumped. Thankfully, none of
these dioxin babies ever woke up.

One floor below, it is never quiet. Here are those who have survived the
misery of their births, ravaged infants whom no one has the ability to
understand, babies so traumatised by their own disabilities, luckless
children so enraged and depressed at their miserable fate, that they are
tied to their beds just to keep them safe from harm

Guardian Unlimited © Guardian Newspapers Limited 2003
Forwarded for your information.  The text and intent of the article
have to stand on their own merits.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material
is distributed without charge or profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this type of information
for non-profit research and educational purposes only.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Do not believe in anything simply because you have heard it. Do
not believe simply because it has been handed down for many genera-
tions.  Do not believe in anything simply because it is spoken and
rumoured by many.  Do not believe in anything simply because it is
written in Holy Scriptures.  Do not believe in anything merely on
the authority of teachers, elders or wise men.  Believe only after
careful observation and analysis, when you find that it agrees with
reason and is conducive to the good and benefit of one and all.
Then accept it and live up to it." The Buddha on Belief,
from the Kalama Sutra

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http://archive.jab.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http://archive.jab.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to