-Caveat Lector- www.ctrl.org DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ <A HREF="">ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

--- Begin Message ---
-Caveat Lector-

Kerry and the war
by Leon Wofsy

http://homepage.mac.com/leonwofsy July 5, 2004:

Why is Kerry failing to distinguish himself clearly
from Bush on the Iraq war and occupation?

After all, there are others in establishment circles
who differ sharply on the war policies of the Bush
Administration. Gore, Kennedy, Byrd, and even
Brezhinsky, the inveterate cold warrior of yesteryear,
stand out in opposition. Several articles by George
Soros, the multibillionaire, are strikingly lucid
challenges to delusions of American supremacy and
empire.

Part of the answer undoubtedly involves judgment on
election strategy (poor judgment, in the opinion of
many). It's the notion that the campaign must
accommodate to an electorate that has been moved center
and right since the days of Ronald Reagan. That's the
strategy that - with the help of dirty tricks and the
Supreme Court - gave the White House to George W. Bush
in 2000. It is amplified this time around by
intimidation, the fear of appearing weak and out of
step with Bush's holy "war on terror".

There's another part to the answer that's even more
deeply rooted than political pragmatism. That is the
commitment to US global dominance that is effectively
required of anyone who has a real hope of becoming
President in the current climate. Kerry's most
influential backers surely share the widespread alarm
over the extremism of the Bush Administration. They
worry about the antagonism and isolation generated by
the recklessly aggressive war and foreign policy, and
likely also have misgivings about the GOP push toward a
monopoly of power and autocratic one party rule. But
for all their justified laments about Bush's
"unilateralism", their worldview is based on exploiting
superpower advantage to gain universal acquiescence to
US "leadership" and imperial supremacy. Furthermore,
you only had to listen to Bob (the other) Kerry at the
9/11 hearings to recognize that not all hawks are
Republicans.

A realistic view of aspirations to US dominance in the
sweep of capitalist globalization doesn't minimize the
importance of the election outcome in November. There
is an enormous divide between the consequences of a
second term for Bush and a victory for Kerry. The plain
fact is that this administration is the most warlike
and anti-democratic in our history.  It may, however,
have engineered its own political downfall by
overreaching with its pre-emptive war doctrine, its
extravagant deceits, its fundamentalist "Christian"
social agenda, its "Patriot Act" and blatant favors to
its "have more" base. On the other hand, the
conglomerate social forces that oppose movement toward
a pseudo-fascist America are also capable of compelling
a progressive shift on major social and economic issues
and a saner approach to international problems. So
every vote against Bush is an act of hope, and a clear-
cut defeat for Bush would be a mandate for democratic
renewal.

True, defeating Bush would not by itself overcome the
damage done to American society and to the world in the
last couple of decades. It would, however, be more than
a sharp turn off the road to disaster. It could be a
new beginning in a long struggle for peace, justice,
equality and survival. Beyond blocking the crusaders of
the ultra-right, that struggle has to bring about a
great change in priorities, worldwide and in the United
States.  The 9/11 terrorist attack on the United States
and its exploitation to justify the blunderbuss
extremism of the Bush Administration have changed the
international and domestic agenda drastically. Banished
from attention are problems that most affect the future
of humanity and the needs of the majority of Americans.
The travesty is that only when combating poverty and
disease are at the top of the agenda can collective
efforts succeed against adherents of terrorism and war.

Priority on human needs and world community can only
come about by popular demand, not through spontaneous
action by politicians who navigate through conflicting
pressures and interests. The most important truth
brought forth involuntarily by the Bush
Administration's conduct is that the vast majority of
humanity rejects war and resists empire.  Now most
Americans say the country has been put on the wrong
track. If we vote accordingly in November, the odds
that we can move on to a better track are greatly
improved. Only the people and their persistent struggle
can provide a guarantee. The alternative of another
Bush term remains a possibility. That would put
democracy and the struggle for it at unprecedented
disadvantage. That's why many who work for a stronger
and more principled campaign will not hesitate to vote
for Kerry.

_______________________________________________________

portside (the left side in nautical parlance) is a news,
discussion and debate service of the Committees of
Correspondence for Democracy and Socialism. It aims to
provide varied material of interest to people on the
left.

For answers to frequently asked questions:
<http://www.portside.org/faq>

To subscribe, unsubscribe or change settings:
<http://lists.portside.org/mailman/listinfo/portside>

To submit material, paste into an email and send to:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (postings are moderated)

For assistance with your account:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

To search the portside archive:
<http://people-link5.inch.com/pipermail/portside/>

www.ctrl.org
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!   These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
<A HREF="http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to