-Caveat Lector-

Remember:More people have died in Ted Kennedy's car than have died in
United States Commercial Nuclear Power plant operations

 visit my web site at
http://www.info-quest.org  My ICQ# is 79071904
See the Pledge of alleginace to the flag that the 9th circuit court of
appeals doesn't want you to say.
for a precise list of the powers of the Federal Government linkto:
http://www.info-quest.org/Enumerated.html

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 16:42:15 PDT
From: carl william spitzer iv <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [JBirch] WS>>Congress Considers Free Speech Protection For Churches



          By Jeff Johnson
          CNSNews.com Congressional Bureau Chief


          Capitol Hill (CNSNews.com) - In the past 22 years,  the
     Internal  Revenue Service has either revoked the  tax-exempt
     status of a church or religious organization or levied taxes
     on such a group for engaging in "prohibited political activ-
     ities"  fewer than ten times. But some members  of  Congress
     say that is ten times too many.

          The  House  Ways and Means  Subcommittee  on  Oversight
     Tuesday  heard  testimony on two bills designed  to  protect
     churches and other religious organizations from the IRS: the
     Bright-Line Act of 2001 and the Houses of Worship  Political
     Speech Protection Act.

          The  Bright-Line Act of 2001 would amend  the  Internal
     Revenue  Code to allow churches to participate or  intervene
     in  political campaigns while still maintaining  their  tax-
     exempt  status,  so  long as such  participation  is  not  a
     "substantial part" of their activities.

          The  Houses of Worship Political Speech Protection  Act
     is a more detailed proposal. It would deny tax-exempt status
     to any non-profit organization if the organization:

          -  Devotes a "substantial part" of its activities,  and
     20 percent or more of its annual gross revenues to influence
     legislation; or
          -  Spends  five  percent or more of  its  annual  gross
     revenues  to participate or intervene in any political  cam-
     paign  on behalf of, or in opposition to, any candidate  for
     public  office, including publishing or distributing  state-
     ments; or
          - Normally spends in excess of 20 percent of its annual
     gross revenues on a combination of the two activities.

          Colby  May, senior counsel for the American Center  for
     Law and Justice, says it is essential that one of the  bills
     be passed into law.

          "If  this  were  1953, we wouldn't  need  this  hearing
     because  churches  were able to do this without  concern  or
     fear  that federal government was going to come  and  revoke
     their tax exemption," May said.

          In fact, prior to 1954, churches were deemed to be able
     to  speak out on any issue they desired. What some call  the
     "separation  of  state from church" mandated  by  the  First
     Amendment  proclamation  that, "Congress shall make  no  law
     respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting  the
     free exercise thereof," was considered to be absolute.

          Then  on July 2, 1954, then-Senator Lyndon Johnson  (D-
     Texas)  introduced an amendment to a tax code revision  that
     was being considered on the Senate floor.

          The amendment, which prohibits all non-profit groups  -
     including  churches  - from engaging in  political  activity
     without  losing  their  tax-exempt status,  passed  with  no
     debate.  It  was later learned that Johnson  introduced  the
     amendment  in  response to  two  non-profit,  anti-communist
     organizations opposing his primary re-election bid in Texas.

          Despite the origin of the current law, Rev. Barry Lynn,
     executive  director  of Americans United for  Separation  of
     Church  and State, says it must remain in force to avoid  "a
     reckless experiment in mixing religion with partisan  polit-
     ics."

          "Make  no  mistake.  These bills  are  not  about  free
     speech," Lynn claimed in his testimony to the  subcommittee.
     "Instead they would promote the corruption of the church and
     the corruption of the political process."

          Lynn's  group  also opposes  public  school  graduation
     prayers,  the  display  of the Ten  Commandments  on  public
     property,  and  the teaching of the  theory  of  intelligent
     design alongside the theory of evolution in public schools.

          Dr.  D. James Kennedy, president of Coral Ridge  Minis-
     tries,  notes  the difficulty even tax  lawyers,  much  less
     religious leaders, have interpreting the current IRS regula-
     tions.

          "I  have  talked  to many ministers who  will  not  say
     anything  on any social issue or any other issue that  might
     be perceived as being unacceptable," he explained,  "because
     they  were afraid that the IRS would come down on  them  ...
     and  that  they would experience  repercussions  because  of
     that."

          Rep.  John Lewis (D-Ga.) fears that, if the  bills  are
     passed, churches will become a "conduit [for] large  contri-
     butions" to political candidates and campaigns.

          A tax law expert told Lewis that current federal  elec-
     tion  laws  would prohibit tax-exempt  money  collected  for
     religious  purposes from being passed on to  political  cam-
     paigns.

          "That  is existing law, and there's no suggestion  that
     it would change," said Steven Miller, director of the Exempt
     Organizations Division of the Internal Revenue Service.

          Rep. Walter Jones (R-N.C.) says the greater fear should
     be the unconstitutional power currently vested in the IRS.

          "I  firmly  believe  that threatening  the  tax  exempt
     status of those houses of worship whose speech the IRS deems
     has  'crossed  the  line into politics' has  the  effect  of
     denying their right to the free exercise of their  religious

     beliefs," he said.

          Jones  says religious leaders should not have  to  fear
     consequences  from the government when speaking out  to  en-
     courage "the practical political application" of the  teach-
     ings of their faith.

          "That," he concluded, "is as chilling as it is wrong."

          E-mail a news tip to Jeff Johnson.

http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewNation.asp?Page=\Nation\archiv


________________________________________________________________
Get your name as your email address.
Includes spam protection, 1GB storage, no ads and more
Only $1.99/ month - visit http://www.mysite.com/name today!



------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~-->
Make a clean sweep of pop-up ads. Yahoo! Companion Toolbar.
Now with Pop-Up Blocker. Get it for free!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/L5YrjA/eSIIAA/yQLSAA/A0NplB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~->

The opinions expressed on this forum are those of the authors of the articles posted. 
The John Birch Society has no responsibility for anything that is posted on this 
forum. The OFFICIAL John Birch Society web page is a www.jbs.org "Look alike" clone 
pages, run by others, violate JBS policy. Visit The New American at 
www.thenewamerican.com

"The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing."

Edmund Burke 1729-1797

"Those who beat their swords into plowshares will plow for those who still have 
swords."Get FAST unlimited reliable uncensored internet service for $9.95 per month
No Setup Fees.
No Contracts.
No limit on email groups.
5 email accounts at no additional cost.
Fastest Dialup Connection available.

Click here now
http://www.getmysmartisp.net
Fastest Dialup Connection available.

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/JBirch/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

www.ctrl.org
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!   These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
<A HREF="http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to