-Caveat Lector-

TOP SECRET INTERVIEW EXPOSED!
July 5, 2006


It was nice to see The New York Times commemorating Independence Day this
week with a tribute to its favorite Revolutionary War hero, Benedict
Arnold. Times editor Bill Keller spent the day attending Revolutionary War
battle re-enactments, where he passed the Continental Army's secret battle
plans to the British.

This week I plan to reveal my own top secret information: an interview I
did with the New York Post the week my current No. 1 best seller,
"Godless," was released. On account of an important breaking story on
Angelina Jolie's new tattoo, the Post never found room to run the long
interview I wasted my time answering for the Post's Larry Getlen.

Once considered a legitimate daily, the Post has been reduced to tabloid
status best known for Page Six's breathless accounts of Paris Hilton's
latest ruttings, and headlines like "Vampire Teen  H.S. Girl Is Out for
Blood." How crappy a newspaper is the Post? Let me put it this way: It's
New York's second-crappiest paper.

Maybe the Post's constant harassment of me is an attempt to shake me down
for protection money like they did with billionaire businessman Ron
Burkle. I have sold a LOT of books  more books, come to think of it, than
any writers at the New York Post.

Here's Part 1:

NY POST: Vitriol aside for a moment, how would you define a liberal,
politically speaking?

A: Naive, misinformed fanatical Mother Earth-worshipers and fervent
America-haters  and those are their good traits.

NY POST: In "Godless," you lump many views you disagree with under the
banner of a liberal religion. But many Democrats (as with Republicans)
disagree amongst themselves on many of these issues. Do you consider all
Americans who vote Democrat to be liberals?

A: Or fools.

NY POST: How many liberals do you think there actually are in this
country?

A: Way too many, but that's just a rough estimate. You know, somewhere in
the ballpark of "way too many."

NY POST: Your books, like Bill O'Reilly's, generally go to No. 1. But so
do Michael Moore's and Al Franken's. What do you think this says about the
real nature of what Americans believe, politically and ideologically?

A: Judging by your list, that half of them are patriotic.

NY POST: In the last two presidential elections combined, the number of
people who voted for the Democrat and the number who voted for the
Republican were pretty close to even. Isn't it safe to say that the
country rests somewhere in the middle of conservatism and liberalism?

A: Yes, I think the results of the last "American Idol" vote pretty much
proved that.

NY POST: Your characterization of liberals paints them as extremists. But
with people like Pat Robertson telling us how God keeps telling him who
He's angry at, isn't it fair to say that there are extremists on both
sides?

A: Pat Robertson opposes capital punishment, opposed the impeachment of
Bill Clinton and supports trade with China, just for starters. Seems like
a pretty mixed bag to me. So what makes you call him extreme? That he
believes he has dialogue with the Lord? Do liberals now call anyone who
thinks this an "extremist"?

NY POST: Do you believe there is a political middle? If so, how would you
define it?

A: There is no more a "political middle" than there is a family in America
with 2.3 children. People with opinions take sides. Contrary to what
you've heard, it's actually more important to stand for something than it
is for everybody to "just get along."

NY POST: You speak in the book of "Muslims' predilection for violence,"
accepting it as a given. But many would argue that many Muslims, in this
country and others, lead average, everyday lives, and denounce violence.
How is painting all Muslims as violent any different than looking at the
Crusades, or at any of the Christian extremist groups around today, and
saying, "All Christians are murderers?"

A: Quite obviously, referring to "Muslims' predilection for violence" is
not the same as saying, "All Christians are murderers." It would be the
same if I had said, "All Muslims are murderers." You didn't do too well on
the analogies section of the SATs, did you?

NY POST: You say that "without a fundamental understanding of man's place
in the world" (by which you mean God), we risk being lured into, among
other things, slavery. But weren't the American slaveholders devout
Christians?

A: They may have been devout Christians, but they weren't being good
Christians by holding slaves. That's the point: Any Christian slaveholder
had to violate Christianity to own slaves.
Thus  and obviously  the abolitionist movement was fueled by Christians,
much as the anti-abortion movement is today.

I'm sure in the year 2106 some future Ann Coulter will be asked to explain
why some Christians had abortions 100 years earlier. Christians sometimes
lapse into the church of liberalism by doing bad things, just as liberals
sometimes lapse into our church by doing good things.

(To be continued later this summer ...)

COPYRIGHT 2006 ANN COULTER
DISTRIBUTED BY UNIVERSAL PRESS SYNDICATE
4520 Main Street, Kansas City, MO 64111





Remember:More people have died in Ted Kennedy's car than have died in
United States Commercial Nuclear Power plant operations
 visit my web site at
http://www.info-quest.org
Visit my energy page at  http://www.info-quest.org/Energy.html
Check out the latest on the anwr drilling project http://www.anwr.org
visit my blog at
http://info-spectrum.blogspot.com
 My ICQ# is 79071904
See the Pledge of alleginace to the flag that the 9th circuit court of
appeals doesn't want you to say.
for a precise list of the powers of the Federal Government linkto:
http://www.info-quest.org/Enumerated.html

www.ctrl.org
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!   These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/ctrl@listserv.aol.com/
<A HREF="http://www.mail-archive.com/ctrl@listserv.aol.com/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to