-Caveat Lector- www.ctrl.org DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/ctrl@listserv.aol.com/ <A HREF="">ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

--- Begin Message ---
-Caveat Lector-

----- Original Message -----
From: Earth Policy News <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <undisclosed-recipients:;>
Sent: Saturday, August 26, 2006 3:11 AM
Subject: [ENWL-eng] Earth Policy News: Katrina's Second Wave: Climate
Refugees


>
> Eco-Economy Update 2006-7
> For Immediate Release
> August 16, 2006
>
> GLOBAL WARMING FORCING U.S. COASTAL POPULATION TO MOVE INLAND
> An Estimated 250,000 Katrina Evacuees Are Now Climate Refugees
> http://www.earthpolicy.org/Updates/2006/Update57.htm
>
> Lester R. Brown
>
> Those of us who track the effects of global warming had assumed that the
> first large flow of climate refugees would likely be in the South Pacific
> with the abandonment of Tuvalu or other low-lying islands. We were wrong.
> The first massive movement of climate refugees has been that of people
> away from the Gulf Coast of the United States.
>
> Hurricane Katrina, which made landfall in late August 2005, forced a
> million people from New Orleans and the small towns on the Mississippi and
> Louisiana coasts to move inland either within state or to neighboring
> states, such as Texas and Arkansas. Although nearly all planned to return,
> many have not.
>
> Unlike in previous cases, when residents typically left areas threatened
> by hurricanes and returned when authorities declared it was safe to do so,
> many of these evacuees are finding new homes. In this respect, the U.S.
> hurricane season of 2005 was different. Record-high temperatures in the
> Gulf of Mexico surface waters helped make Hurricane Katrina the most
> financially destructive hurricane ever to make landfall anywhere.
>
> In some Mississippi Gulf Coast towns, Katrina's powerful 28-foot-high
> storm surge (8.5 meters) did not leave a single structure standing. There
> was nothing for evacuees to return to. The destruction of housing and
> infrastructure in St. Bernard Parish, a low-lying 40-mile-long peninsula
> (64 kilometers) extending southeast from New Orleans, rendered most of it
> uninhabitable. The Katrina storm surge that raised the water level in Lake
> Pontchartrain so high that it breached the levees and flooded New Orleans
> left much of the city unfit to live in. Even today, a year later, large
> parts of the city are without basic infrastructure services such as water,
> power, sewage disposal, garbage collection, and telecommunications.
> Interestingly, the country to suffer the most damage from a hurricane is
> also primarily responsible for global warming.
>
> Many evacuees were able to return in a matter of days, but many more were
> not. New Orleans' population before Katrina struck was 463,000. Claritas,
> a private demographic data-gathering and analysis firm, reported that
> after the hurricane New Orleans' population shrank to 93,000. By January
> 2006, it had recovered to 174,000. By July 2006, the city still had only
> 214,000 residents, less than half of its pre-Katrina population.
>
> Three Louisiana coastal parishes (counties) also registered substantial
> population declines. The population of St. Bernard Parish plummeted from
> 66,000 residents to 15,000 in July 2006. South of New Orleans, the
> population of Plaquemines Parish declined from 29,000 to 20,000. Densely
> populated Jefferson Parish, also bordering New Orleans on the south,
> dropped from 453,000 to 411,000, a loss of 42,000.
>
> Mississippi's three coastal counties each lost population. The July
> tabulation showed Hancock County had lost 8,000 residents. Harrison
> County, which includes the town of Gulfport, lost 12,000, and Jackson
> County 4,000. (See data at
> www.earthpolicy.org/Updates/2006/Update57_data.htm.)
>
> As of July 2006, New Orleans, the three parishes, and the three counties
> in Mississippi had lost a total of 375,000 residents because of
> destruction from Katrina. Some evacuees are still returning, but the flow
> has slowed to a near trickle. We estimate that at least 250,000 of them
> have established homes elsewhere and will not return. They no longer want
> to face the personal trauma and financial risks associated with rising
> seas and more destructive storms. These evacuees are now climate refugees.
>
> While the July numbers tell us how many people have not returned home,
> they do not capture the personal trauma of exposure to a disaster that
> claimed 1,300 lives or the sense of loss from being abruptly uprooted from
> home and community, and separated from schools, jobs, and friends.
> Assessing Katrina's effects, the American Psychological Association notes
> that many of the storm's victims experience post-traumatic stress
> disorder. This manifestation of extreme stress is similar to that of
> troops returning from Iraq.
>
> Hanging over the future of the hurricane-prone coastal regions of the U.S.
> southeast is the difficulty in getting property insurance. In the wake of
> the last two hurricane seasons, including the 2004 season when four
> hurricanes crossed Florida, reconstruction is still ongoing, insurance
> costs are climbing, and private insurance companies are withdrawing from
> high-risk coastal areas.
>
> The movement of insurers out of high-risk regions started after Hurricane
> Andrew hit Florida in 1992, destroying 60,000 homes and bankrupting some
> 11 local insurance companies. In response, governments in hurricane-prone
> states, including Florida, Mississippi, and Louisiana, each created a
> state-supported insurance company for homeowners unable to get private
> insurance. Florida's state insurer, Citizens Property Insurance
> Corporation, ran a deficit of $516 million in 2004. An analysis of risks
> and costs in late 2005 showed that premiums charged to property owners
> must be raised 80 percent to ensure Citizens' future viability.
>
> These deficits were repeated in Louisiana and at the national level with
> the National Flood Insurance Program, which ran a $23 billion deficit in
> 2005. The bottom line is that rates must rise as the risk rises. This
> applies not only to property insurance, but also for firms seeking to
> insure against business interruption losses.
>
> After a point as storm risks multiply and insurance rates rise, real
> estate prices start to decline. To cite an extreme example, how much is a
> building lot worth in St. Bernard Parish, now largely abandoned, or in the
> low-lying parts of New Orleans? Some of the businesses in these hard-hit
> areas that are not tied directly to local customers, such as consulting
> firms, software companies, or publishing houses, have moved to more secure
> locations. New Orleans entrepreneur, Ken Murray, who founded Parker,
> Murray and Associates, a sales and marketing company, is among those who
> have moved their firms to Dallas.
>
> Katrina took a heavy toll in the Louisiana and Mississippi coastal
> regions, but there are 35 million people living along the hurricane-prone
> coast that stretches from North Carolina to Texas. Half of these live in
> Florida: 10 million on the Atlantic coast and 7 million on the Gulf coast.
>
> As rising seas and more powerful hurricanes translate into higher
> insurance costs in these coastal communities, people are retreating
> inland. And just as companies migrate to regions with lower wages, they
> also migrate to regions with lower insurance costs.
>
> The experience with more destructive storms in recent years is only the
> beginning. Since 1970, the Earth's average temperature has risen by one
> degree Fahrenheit, but by 2100 it could rise by up to 10 degrees
> Fahrenheit (6 degrees Celsius).
>
> More destructive storms are an early manifestation of global warming. The
> longer term risk is that rising temperatures will melt glaciers and polar
> ice caps, raising sea level and displacing coastal residents worldwide.
> The flow of climate refugees to date numbers in the thousands, but if we
> do not quickly reduce CO2 emissions, it could one day number in the
> millions.
>
> #    #   #
>
> Additional data and information sources at www.earthpolicy.org or contact
> jlarsen (at) earthpolicy.org
>
> For reprint permission contact rjk (at) earthpolicy.org
>
> For a plan to cut CO2 emissions see Chapter 10 in Plan B 2.0 at
> www.earthpolicy.org/Books/PB2/PB2ch10_ss7.htm
>
>
>
>
> ------------- *  ENWL  * ------------
> Ecological North West Line * St. Petersburg, Russia
> Independent Environmental Net Service
> Russian: ENWL(discussions), ENWL-inf(FSU infomation), ENWL-talk(any
topics)
> English: ENWL-eng (world information)
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subscription, Moderator: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> (C) Please refer to exclusive articles of ENWL
> http://www.enwl.net.ru (for ENWL only)
> -------------------------------------
>
www.ctrl.org DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/ctrl@listserv.aol.com/ <A HREF="">ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to