-Caveat Lector-

 


**************************************
 See what's new at http://www.aol.com

www.ctrl.org
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!   These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/ctrl@listserv.aol.com/
<A HREF="http://www.mail-archive.com/ctrl@listserv.aol.com/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om
--- Begin Message ---
-Caveat Lector-

Neofeudalism
_http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neofeudalism_ 
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neofeudalism)  
 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Unbalanced_scales.svg) 
The _neutrality_ 
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view)  of this article 
is _disputed_ 
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:NPOV_dispute) .
Please see the discussion on the _talk page_ 
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Neofeudalism) .
Please do not remove this message until the _dispute is resolved._ 
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:NPOVD#What_is_an_NPOV_dispute.3F) 
Neofeudalism literally means "New _Feudalism_ 
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feudalism) " and implies a contemporary rebirth 
of policies of _governance_ 
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Governance)  and _economy_ 
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economy)  reminiscent of those present in many 
_pre-industrial_ 
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pre-industrial)  feudal societies. The concept is 
one in 
which government policies are instituted with the effect (deliberate or 
otherwise) of systematically increasing the _wealth_ 
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wealth)  _gap_ 
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Income_distribution)  between the 
rich and the poor while increasing the power of the rich and decreasing the 
power of the poor (also see _wealth condensation_ 
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wealth_condensation) ). This effect is considered 
to be similar to the 
effects of traditional feudalism. The precise meaning of the term is in 
question and 
can be employed as a _pejorative term_ 
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pejorative_term)  to attack _political_ 
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political)  
opponents. 
General 
Among the concerns of those who perceive (correctly or otherwise) an 
emergence of neofeudalism in contemporary society are class stratification, 
_globalization_ (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Globalization) , _multinational 
corporations_ (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multinational_corporation) , and 
"_corporatism_ (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporatism) ."_[1]_ 
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neofeudalism#_note-0)  
Neofeudalism is part of the controversy over _income redistribution_ 
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Income_redistribution)  born out of massive 
societal 
shifts during the _industrial revolution_ 
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Industrial_revolution) . At the time the issue 
was wealth disparity between _classes_ 
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_class) , landholders, entrepreneurs, 
peasants, workers, and other economic and social groups. Neofeudalism 
encompasses 
the current debate over globalization to include entire societies, countries, 
regions ("North" versus "South," "Western" versus "non-Western"), and 
supra-national non-state actors. Unlike other _geopolitical_ 
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geopolitics)  issues such as _environmentalism_ 
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Environmentalism)  and _security_ 
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Security) 
, the charge of "neofeudalism" largely focuses on _economics_ 
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economics) . 
In a party-neutral definition of the term, the traits ascribed to a 
supposedly emerging neofeudalism would not belong to one political party alone 
but are 
emergent throughout the whole political system in all or at least several 
major parties. Under this description the common factor linking neofeudal 
characteristics could best be described as "the business interests catered to 
by a 
given party" which describes a version of neofeudalism with its origin squarely 
in the realm of business interests and the interests of business owners 
advancing agendas that benefit them personally through _political action 
committees_ 
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_action_committees)  and _lobbying_ 
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lobbying)  efforts directed at politicians not in 
one, but in every political party. This is one version of the "accidental" or 
unintentional definition of neofeudalism and describes it as the projected end 
result of rich individuals influencing politics strongly to their personal 
advantage over time. In this party-neutral definition there is no _cabal_ 
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cabal)  or _secret society_ 
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secret_society)  deliberately guiding national 
politics, but rather the sum 
effect of the pressures put on politics by the _wealthy_ 
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wealthy)  or _elite_ 
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elite)  can be 
described as moving towards a sort of "new feudalism" simply because such 
systems evolved to serve the interests of the elite in antiquated instances as 
well. 
One retort to application of the term neofeudalism is that such historical 
feudalism maintained _caste_ (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caste)  outside of 
consideration for _capital_ (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capital_(economics)) 
, 
where wealth divides could only make _merchants_ 
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Merchant)  out of common men, and class gaps of 
_aristocracy_ 
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aristocracy)  were unbreachable even by private 
wealth until 
the late stages and breakdown of feudalism. To that extent, the labeling of 
monopoly capitalism as neofeudalism can be seen as a _misnomer_ 
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Misnomer) . 
Others would argue, however, that the prefix "neo-" is distinctly meant to 
separate modern feudalism from the old kind and that use of the term only means 
that it mimics many of the effects of the old feudalism: an entrenched, 
fabulously wealthy elite, held in place by low taxes on capital and no taxes on 
estates; and a large and growing class of uneducated, unskilled labor brought 
in 
by unchecked immigration (both legal and illegal), and kept in check by high 
levels of personal debt, and high taxes on earned income (payroll, income, 
sales, property, etc.) 
Another specific and alternative application of the term neofeudalism alleges 
that corporate and government policies make workers dependent on the 
corporations, as well as making the economic power of the corporations greater 
than 
the power of national _governments_ (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Government) . 
This, detractors say, leads to a situation where workers are dependent on 
private interests that are more powerful than government, resembling the 
situation 
that prevailed during historic feudalism. Although it should be noted that in 
feudal law localized _prerogatives_ 
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prerogative)  were considered government. 
Use and Etymology
There is controversy over the correct application of neofeudalism as a term, 
and its political usage is often highly charged with partisan prejudice. 
Neofeudalism is often used by critics to describe political policies of 
opponents, 
and in extreme cases there may be asserted to be a deliberate drive towards a 
re-imagination of feudal systems of governance for implementation within the 
context of an _information age_ (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Information_age)  
society.
The term seems to have been originated as a criticism of the paternalistic 
left; an early example being the essay _Galbraith's_ 
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Kenneth_Galbraith)  Neo-Feudalism_[2]_ 
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neofeudalism#_note-1)  published in 1961. The 
term is still used by some on the 
right in that sense in the twenty-first century: 
Although he would later become a naturalized American citizen, Soros remains 
in social outlook very much a European and believer in the paternalistic 
neo-feudalism euphemistically called "democratic socialism" or "social 
democracy." 
_[3]_ (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neofeudalism#_note-2) 
One of its applications to current politicians is that it explains the 
support of some for both high levels of nearly uncontrolled immigration and of 
reduced taxation on the rich. Politicians thus targeted by the term are also 
frequently opposed to minimum wage laws, claiming they would reduce job 
opportunities for the poor and the young, even though their support for open 
borders is 
based on the claim that the economy is already producing too many jobs. These 
policies, traditionalists say, would continue to devalue the labor of the 
working class while creating a wealthy elite that is permanently entrenched in 
the 
style of a a feudal state. Other applications might include pointing to an 
individual politician's family history of holding high elected office as 
possible 
evidence supporting accusations of an emerging _hereditary_ 
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hereditary)  _aristocracy_ 
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aristocracy)  (another common characteristic of 
feudal societies). 
ORIGINAL VERSION: 
_http://72.14.253.104/search?q=cache:Xj1_pRxxq_sJ:en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neofeudalism+neocon+OR+bush+OR+wikipedia+OR+pnac+OR+cia+OR+atom+OR
+nazi+%22Lowell+Ponte%22&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=2&gl=us&ie=UTF-8_ 
(http://72.14.253.104/search?q=cache:Xj1_pRxxq_sJ:en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neofeudalism+neocon+OR+b
ush+OR+wikipedia+OR+pnac+OR+cia+OR+atom+OR+nazi+"Lowell+Ponte"&hl=en&ct=clnk&c
d=2&gl=us&ie=UTF-8)  
One of its applications to current politicians, especially by conservatives 
who wish to distance themselves from the policies of _President George W Bush_ 
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/President_George_W_Bush) , is that it explains 
the support of some Republicans for both high levels of nearly uncontrolled 
immigration and of reduced taxation on the rich. Such politicians are also 
frequently opposed to minimum wage laws, claiming they would reduce job 
opportunities for the poor and the young, even though their support for open 
borders is 
based on the claim that the economy is already producing too many jobs. These 
policies, traditionalists say, would continue to devalue the labor of the 
working class while creating a wealthy elite that is permanently entrenched. 
They 
also use Bush's family history (being the son of a president and grandson of a 
US Senator) as proof of an aristocratic bent in President Bush.
Traditional Feudalism
 

Feudalism is a political system of power dispersed and balanced between 
_king_ (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/King)  and nobles. This is a weak system 
and 
it refers to a general set of _reciprocal_ 
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reciprocal)  _legal_ 
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal)  and _military_ 
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military)  obligations among the warrior 
_nobility_ 
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nobility)  of Europe during the _Middle Ages_ 
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Middle_Ages) , revolving around the three key 
concepts 
of _lords_ (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lords) , _vassals_ 
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vassals) , and _fiefs_ 
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fiefs) .


Neofeudalism in popular culture
    *   _Frank Herbert_ (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frank_Herbert) 's 
_Dune_ (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dune_universe)  series of novels set in 
the 
distant future with a neofeudalistic galactic empire known as the Imperium 
after 
the _Butlerian Jihad_ (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Butlerian_Jihad)  which 
prohibits all kinds of thinking machine technology, even its simpler forms. 
References
 
    1.  _^_ (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neofeudalism#_ref-0)  Thom 
Hartmann, "Time to Remove the Bananas...and Return Our Republic to Democracy", 
CommonDreams.org, 6 November 2002 _[1]_ 
(http://www.commondreams.org/views02/1106-07.htm)   
    2.  _^_ (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neofeudalism#_ref-1)  _George 
Reisman_ (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Reisman)  Human Events, February 
1961 
_[2]_ (http://www.mises.org/web/2793)   
    3.  _^_ (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neofeudalism#_ref-2)  Lowell Ponte 
"George Soros: Billionaire for the Left" Front Page Magazine, November 13, 
2003 

 
_http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neofeudalism_Controversy_in_United_States_Politi
cs_ 
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neofeudalism_Controversy_in_United_States_Politics)
  
There is controversy over the correct application of _Neofeudalism_ 
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neofeudalism)  as a term, and its political usage 
is 
often highly charged with _partisan_ (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Partisan)  
prejudice. Neofeudalism is often used by critics to describe political policies 
of 
opponents, and in extreme cases there may be asserted to be a deliberate 
drive towards a re-imagination of _feudal_ 
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feudal)  
systems of governance for implementation within the context of an _information 
age_ (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Information_age)  society. 
The term seems to have been originated as a criticism of the paternalistic 
left; an early example being the essay _Galbraith's_ 
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Kenneth_Galbraith)  Neo-Feudalism_[1]_ 
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neofeudalism_Controversy_in_United_States_Politics#_note-0)
  published in 1961. 
The term is still used by some on the right in that sense in the twenty-first 
century: 
Although he would later become a naturalized American citizen, Soros remains 
in social outlook very much a European and believer in the paternalistic 
neo-feudalism euphemistically called "democratic socialism" or "social 
democracy." 
_[2]_ 
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neofeudalism_Controversy_in_United_States_Politics#_note-1)
 
Applications
One of its applications to current politicians is that it explains the 
support of some for both high levels of nearly uncontrolled immigration and of 
reduced _taxation_ (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taxation)  on the rich. 
Politicians thus targeted by the term are also frequently opposed to minimum 
wage laws, 
claiming they would reduce job opportunities for the poor and the young, even 
though their support for open borders is based on the claim that the economy 
is already producing too many jobs. These policies, traditionalists say, would 
continue to devalue the labor of the working class while creating a wealthy 
elite that is permanently entrenched in the style of a a feudal state. Other 
applications might include pointing to an individual politician's family 
history 
of holding high elected office as possible evidence supporting accusations of 
an emerging _hereditary_ (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hereditary)  
_aristocracy_ (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aristocracy)  (another common 
characteristic 
of feudal societies).



************************************** See what's new at http://www.aol.com

www.ctrl.org
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!   These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/ctrl@listserv.aol.com/
<A HREF="http://www.mail-archive.com/ctrl@listserv.aol.com/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to