-Caveat Lector-
A fuller explanation of the terms for "peace" in Kosovo, as detailed on
MS-NBC today, revealed that NATO (US/Britain) now requires that the Serbian
uniformed army, Serbian "para-military," Serbian police (and technically
even Serbian security guards), and Serbian CIVILIANS that are pro-Milosevic,
give up their guns or be classified as combatants, i.e., violating the
"peace" agreement. Anyone, military OR civilian, is therefore automatically
subject to the rules of war if he or she possesses a firearm.
From what I heard, however, the same terms do NOT apply equally to the
KLA or to Kosovar civilians supporting the KLA.
"Peace" between the Serbs and Kosovars therefore means that the Serbs
are being deprived of their right to self-defense, while the Kosovars (by now
pretty pissed off and chanting "Death to all Serbs!") are being allowed, if
not encouraged, to be fully armed.
And the only others fully armed are the anti-Serb US/British "peacekeepers."
How many of our "hawks" are supporters of "gun control," just ELSEWHERE?
The thought --possibly paranoid-- crossed my mind that these "little
wars" abroad
are only "practice" for a bigger, more dangerous war someday -- the "peace"
that the UN, NATO or other global agency expects to wage in AMERICA, as the
US is more fully "reintegrated" within the global-market framework of the
projected North American Union and finally Western Hemispheric Union, broken
down ("devolved") into smaller territories defined LIKEWISE primarily by
ETHNIC ("cultural") common denominators -- which would make southern
California, parts of the Southwest and Texas MEXICAN territory, and meld the
northern US with Canada (except for the French in Quebec).
(That would explain why the Clinton Administration looked the other way while
the Red Chinese delivered assault weapons to the Zapatistas and to Latino
gangs in East LA.)
So, perhaps the "urban warrior" military exercises that have been
occurring more frequently in this country are NOT "practice" for wars abroad,
as the official story goes (despite years of "practice," the strategies and
technology specific to "urban warfare" are NOT being used in Belgrade, at
least thus far) but actually the reverse -- "little" wars abroad are practice
for the far GREATER challenge of urban warfare HERE AT HOME.
How did that NATO general, "by coincidence" on the scene during the
Columbine High School massacre, feel about "gun control"?
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing! These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
