-Caveat Lector-

Insight
August 16, 1999


China's Beachhead at Panama Canal

            By J. Michael Waller


            Reporting from Balboa, Insight uncovers
            China's most recent political and
            economic maneuverings to obtain
            effective control of the Panama Canal as
            the U.S. leaves.

              At the Panama Canal's only Pacific port a
              dozen huge construction cranes work
            massive new containerized-cargo facilities behind
            mounds of sand and concrete. Workmen clad in
            orange uniforms emblazoned with "Panama Ports
            Company" -- the innocuous English-language name
            in a near century-old bastion of U.S. maritime
            might -- operate the cranes and earthmovers
            alongside what once was the U.S. military's
            Southern Command headquarters known as
            SOUTHCOM. But the construction crews don't
            work for the Americans anymore. The Panama
            Ports Company is controlled by Communist
            China.
            . . . . As U.S. forces pull out of Panama under the
            Carter-Torrijos treaties of 1977, Beijing's agents
            are moving in. And the Clinton administration is
            looking the other way, scrapping a 1995 plan to
            explore a continued U.S. military presence.
            . . . . By all indications, China and its People's
            Liberation Army, or PLA, are building a
            beachhead to control the Panama Canal. Under the
            terms of a controversial lease, Panama gave Hong
            Kong-based Hutchison Whampoa Ltd. the right to
            build new port facilities in Balboa, the canal's only
            Pacific port, and a major Atlantic port in Cristobal,
            and to run them up to the next half-century. As
            Beijing increased its economic muscle in the
            country, Panama's politicians gave Hutchison
            Whampoa the right to control anchorages on both
            ends of the canal, to hire new pilots to guide ships
            through the waterway, to block all passage that
            interferes with the company's business, to take
            control of key public roads near the canal and to
            have right of first refusal for control of some
            former U.S. military bases.
            . . . . "By most accounts, an unfair and corrupt
            contractual bidding process, which was protested
            by the U.S. ambassador to Panama, enabled the
            Chinese Hutchison Whampoa company to
            outmaneuver American and Japanese companies
            for the long-term lease on the canal ports,"
            according to Al Santoli, an aide to Republican
            Rep. Dana Rohrabacher of California. Santoli has
            traveled the perimeter of the Pacific monitoring
            Chinese maritime encroachments from the
            Philippines to Panama.
            . . . . U.S. Ambassador to Panama William Hughes
            nearly was declared persona non grata for
            protesting the Hutchison deal when it was exposed
            three years ago, a U.S. official tells Insight.
            President Clinton responded by appointing Robert
            Pastor, an architect of the 1977 canal giveaway and
            an advocate for left-wing revolutionary causes, to
            replace Hughes. Senate Foreign Relations
            Committee Chairman Jesse Helms of North
            Carolina, one of the few lawmakers watching the
            Panama powder keg, blocked the nomination.
            . . . . The Chinese company has exclusive rights to
            the ports on both ends of the canal. Ironically, in
            1996 Panama asked a Seattle-based company to
            withdraw its successful bid for Cristobal on the
            grounds that the U.S. firm would have a
            monopoly, in light of its existing business in
            Balboa. The following year, Panama awarded both
            Cristobal and Balboa to Hutchison Whampoa.
            Between the ports lies the shortest land route for
            containerized cargo to be sent between the Atlantic
            and the Pacific from and to ships too large to
            cross the canal.
            . . . . Beijing is in Panama for the long haul.
            Hutchison Whampoa has the right to extend its
            leases until the year 2047 or to transfer them to a
            third party. Already a Chinese corporation called
            Great Wall Panama has secured a lease as long as
            60 years for an export zone on the bank of the
            canal on the Atlantic side.
            . . . . "I have a sense that the U.S. is edgy about
            Hutchison Whampoa," former Panamanian vice
            president Guillermo "Billy" Ford tells Insight. But
            Washington has done little to pressure the corrupt
            government of President Ernesto Perez Balladares
            to reopen the bidding. Last year, Balladares hired
            Clinton strategist James Carville as his personal
            consultant in a bid to keep power beyond his
            constitutional term, which expires this month.
            Balladares says he will step down, but he has
            packed the new Canal Commission with his
            pro-Beijing cronies.
            . . . . Hutchison Whampoa is more than a Hong
            Kong shipping giant. Company chairman Li
            Ka-shing is an important cog in the economic
            machinery of the Chinese Communist Party and
            the PLA. Li is a board member of the Chinese
            government's main investment arm, the China
            International Trust and Investment Corp., or
            CITIC, run by official PLA arms marketeer and
            smuggler Wang Jun.
            . . . . According to Santoli, Li "has invested more
            than a billion dollars in China and owns most of
            the dock space in Hong Kong." Additionally, "Li
            has served as a middle man for PLA business
            dealings with the West," financing some of the
            controversial Hughes Electronics Corp.-Loral
            Space & Communications deals found to have
            been conduits for weapons technology to Beijing.
            He also has been a powerful ally of the Mochtar
            Riady financial empire of Indonesia -- the Lippo
            Group family that according to sworn testimony
            paid off Clinton's friends and political allies on
            behalf of Chinese military intelligence.
            . . . . Hutchison Whampoa's port subsidiary,
            Hutchison International Terminals, or HIT, which
            in turn runs the Panama Ports Co., does
            substantial business with the PLA-owned China
            Ocean Shipping Company, or COSCO, which has
            been seeking to take over former naval facilities in
            Southern California. Some of Hutchison's board
            members consult to COSCO. China Resources
            Enterprise, or CRE, the commercial arm of
            Beijing's Ministry of Trade and Economic
            Cooperation, owns 10 percent of the Panama
            Ports Co. The Senate Governmental Affairs
            Committee has identified CRE as a vehicle for
            "espionage -- economic, political and military -- for
            China."
            . . . . U.S. officials have been slow to realize the
            importance of Hutchison Whampoa and its global
            maritime network in Beijing's strategic planning.
            "Hutchison is trying to build a commercial empire
            in the Americas," a senior U.S. official in Panama
            tells Insight. "If you asked me three years ago, I'd
            say Hutchison Whampoa was just a business
            concern. Logic would tell you that the PRC has
            more opportunity to influence Hutchison
            Whampoa than before."
            . . . . As Santoli sees it, China appears to be
            positioning itself commercially and militarily along
            key naval choke points as they build their navy, the
            way the Soviets tried to do in the 1980s.
            . . . . These choke points include bases in Burma
            to access the Indian Ocean; Hong Kong to project
            power into the South China Sea; the Straits of
            Malacca, where the PRC is expanding ties with
            Cambodia and building a naval facility on the
            Philippines-claimed Spratley Islands; the central
            Pacific, with a major land satellite-tracking station
            on Tarawa; the coast of Hawaii, with a major
            ocean-mining tract; the Caribbean, with new
            influence in the Bahamas and a growing security
            and intelligence relationship with Cuba; and, most
            important, the Panama Canal.
            . . . . "If Red China gets control of the canal, it will
            get control of the government," says Panama City
            Deputy Mayor Augusto Diaz. "The Panama Canal
            is essential to China.... If they control the Panama
            Canal, they control at least one-third of world
            shipping."
            . . . . Though the 1977 Carter-Torrijos treaty gives
            the United States the right to defend the Panama
            Canal militarily, the Clinton administration is
            allowing circumstances to develop in which U.S.
            defense of the waterway could become impossible
            without confronting the Chinese Communists.
            Panama has no standing army of its own and has
            been powerless to repulse Colombian guerrillas
            from its territory. All U.S. military facilities in the
            country will have been abandoned by December --
            and a new Panamanian law gives Hutchison
            Whampoa "first option" to take over the former
            U.S. Naval Station Rodman and other sites, as well
            as an operating area at the former U.S. Albrook
            Air Force Station. "If they get their hands on
            Rodman, they'll have a lot on the Pacific side,"
            notes local journalist Tomas Cabal. "Rodman is
            there at the first set of locks."
            . . . . Panamanian law now gives the Chinese
            company the right to pilot all vessels transiting the
            canal. Retired admiral Thomas H. Moorer, former
            chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, warned the
            Senate last year that U.S. Navy ships soon would
            be at the mercy of Chinese-controlled pilots. A
            U.S. government source tells Insight that U.S.
            nuclear submarines occasionally transit the canal.
            By treaty, U.S. naval vessels have first priority for
            passage, but since the new Panamanian law gives
            Hutchison Whampoa the right to deny passage to
            any ship interfering with its business, the U.S.
            warships could become subject to Red Chinese
            authority.
            . . . . "My specific concern is that this company is
            controlled by the Communist Chinese," Moorer
            told the Senate Foreign Relations Committee in no
            uncertain terms. "They have virtually
            accomplished, without a single shot being fired, a
            stronghold on the Panama Canal."
            . . . . And with U.S. forces out of the picture,
            security of the waterway and even the government
            is in question. Officials note a 25 percent leap in
            emigration from Communist China during the last
            few years, and illegal immigrants from China are
            commonplace. Says Diaz, "There are many
            Chinese in this country with cedulas
            [national-identity papers] saying they are
            Panama-born, but they don't even speak Spanish."

            . . . . "Illegal immigration is a PLA operation,
            giving the permits to get the people out of China,"
            says Cabal, an expert on corruption and crime.
            The immigration director under the previous
            Panamanian government let them in under
            suspicious circumstances. Panamanian journals
            reported that a racket was run through the Panama
            consulate in Hong Kong, which issued the visas.
            The consul and his wife had a travel agency that
            allegedly brought 15,000 Chinese to Panama,
            where crooked immigration officials issued them
            false papers. Intelligence sources say many of
            these illegal immigrants were bound for the United
            States.
            . . . . Beijing uses large-scale emigration to base
            future intelligence assets abroad to recruit agents
            from ethnic Chinese communities, Insight has
            learned. And Panama is a key target. "One of the
            primary factors accounting for the success of
            Chinese intelligence is the exploitation of ... the
            vast emigration of Chinese to communities
            worldwide," according to Stanislav Lunev, a
            former Soviet military-intelligence colonel who
            operated in Beijing before defecting to the United
            States in 1992.
            . . . . According to Lunev, "The Chinese intention
            to develop oceangoing capabilities for its navy is
            well-known. But the Chinese navy does not yet
            have such worldwide capabilities at a time when it
            needs to have information about the perimeter of
            the Pacific region. This is the reason that Chinese
            entrepreneurs are actively in the market for
            abandoned port facilities in strategic locations."
            Lunev specifically cites the Panama Canal.
            . . . . Beijing has been building an overt intelligence
            presence in Panama as well. Insight has learned
            that a Chinese intelligence officer with a staff of 14
            operates as his country's unofficial "ambassador"
            from the 23rd floor of the Global Bank Building on
            50th Street in Panama City.
            . . . . Meanwhile, curiously, Panama is one of the
            last countries in the world that still recognizes the
            Republic of China on Taiwan as the legitimate
            government of China. That may change. Beijing
            now has no shortage of levers to bring Panama
            into line. In addition to the money it is suspected
            of slipping to Panamanian politicians, China wields
            greater economic leverage. Mainland Chinese
            financial institutions have extended nine-figure
            development loans to Panama. A PRC bank
            recently bought Marine Midland, which owns part
            of Panama's debt. In Cristobal, Marine Midland
            shares a building with the Panama Ports Co. The
            Chinese also bought into a consortium led by a
            U.S. railroad company to restore Panama's
            interoceanic rail links.
            . . . . Panama's close historical ties with Hong
            Kong, the British colony that London handed over
            to the Communists in 1997, are another pressure
            point. Three thousand of the 14,000
            Panama-flagged ships worldwide are based in
            Hong Kong. Those ship registries are a major
            source of income for the Panamanian government.
            . . . . The PRC now is the largest goods provider
            into Panama's Free Zone, at $2 billion a year,
            dwarfing Taiwan's $500 million. It is the largest
            user of the canal after the United States and Japan,
            with more than 200 COSCO ships alone transiting
            the waterway annually. Even Taiwanese shipping
            companies such as Evergreen, which runs a large
            containerized cargo facility at the the former U.S.
            military base of Fort Gulick on the Atlantic side,
            could find it has to bow to Beijing's pressure due
            to their large investments on Mainland China.
            . . . . A year ago, a high-level Communist
            commercial delegation visited Panama, in its
            words, to "strengthen relations and promote new
            joint-investment projects." Last March, a
            16-member delegation of the Chinese Communist
            Party's rubber-stamp "parliament" traveled to
            Panama. A member of Panama's ruling PRD party
            said diplomatic relations with Beijing "should not
            be very far off." Polls show that three-fourths of
            Panamanians want the United States to stay in their
            country, but the Clinton administration is
            committed to a total, unconditional pullout by
            year's end. The White House declined to discuss
            keeping a U.S. military presence under
            circumstances permitted by the Carter-Torrijos
            treaty. In his Senate testimony, Moorer warned:
            "We have dropped the ball on the [former] Canal
            Zone, and the game is almost over." Few
            lawmakers even listened to the former chairman of
            the Joint Chiefs of Staff.
            . . . . "China is very clear and focused that they
            want a choke point," says a prominent former
            Panamanian diplomat who was part of the
            negotiations with the United States in the 1970s.
            "Your government has been so shortsighted that it
            hasn't paid attention. It's as simple as that."


=================================================================
           Kaddish, Kaddish, Kaddish, YHVH, TZEVAOT

  FROM THE DESK OF:                    <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
                      *Mike Spitzer*     <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
                         ~~~~~~~~          <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

   The Best Way To Destroy Enemies Is To Change Them To Friends
       Shalom, A Salaam Aleikum, and to all, A Good Day.
=================================================================

DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance�not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to