Recipients-- Please note MAJOR questions re: Kennedy crash autopsies raised by the Boston Globe article quoted verbatim within the following email received by NewsHawk. The sender includes well-reasoned analysis of these quotes. BELOW this, is a forward of another email received by NewsHawk which zeros in a some highly pertinent factors regarding the missing flight trainer/co-pilot, first reported to have been on the flight and later said to be "in Europe". As IF, in a case like THIS--involving the untimely, not to say suspicious (as it now definitely is) death of a person who probably rivaled Princess Diana in terms of global popularity--this flight trainer is NOT going to have SOMETHING public to say, no matter WHERE ON THE FACE OF THE EARTH HE IS? THAT is DEFINITELY completely UNBELIEVABLE. If this person, Kennedy's personal flight trainer, HAD BEEN on board, then obviously he would have died too. Is it possible this person had no relatives and so few friends, acquaintances and such that literally no one on earth would notice their passing? This seems impossible. Why then hasn't this person spoken up, if in fact they are still alive? Or perhaps they are NOT -- whether due to the plane crash or some other, later convenient accident. As their statements would be powerfully important in this case, I wouldn't be TOO surprised if we never hear anything about this person again for the rest of time. John Quinn ================================ Subject: BOSTON GLOBE: JFK Autopsy Rushed Date: Sat, 24 Jul 1999 10:37:13 -0400 (EDT) From: John DiNardo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: John DiNardo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Again, reading from the Boston Globe (www.boston.com), July 23rd: BOSTON GLOBE: JFK Autopsy Rushed "Still, the autopsies in the Kennedy case were performed especially quickly," pathologists said. ..... "The haste [of the autopsies] in this case," he said, "could lead to questions about the investigation's thoroughness." "Pathologists also follow *COMPLEX RULES* for testing a pilot for drug and alcohol use," Dix said. [JD: They are supposed to follow "complex rules" in testing for drug or alcohol use, but they EVIDENTLY violated those rules, indeed, failed to follow them at all! Alcohol and/or drugs are a MAJOR causative suspect in airplane crashes. Remember Ricky Nelson's death in an airplane crash one New Year's Eve? Can someone find out if the coroner examined for substance abuse in that case?] ..... "The timing [brief time] of the Kennedy investigation [autopsy], Kirschner said, makes it unlikely that pathologists performed autopsies on Carolyn Bessette Kennedy or Lauren Bessette. You can't possibly do three investigations in four hours, he said." [JD: Well, of course the women's condition would have no effect on the control of the aircraft. But what if there were powder burns on their bodies, suggesting an explosion or a fire onboard? What if a lone nut gunmen had stowed away aboard the plane? After all, you must admit that lone nut gunmen have made a tradition of invading the lives of Kennedy's. Haven't they? What if the gunman was willing to sacrifice his own life? I'm not saying that I believe any of these scenarios. What I AM saying is that the coroner is SUPPOSED to examine the bodies for the POSSIBILITY of these scenarios having occurred. THAT IS HIS JOB!] "Passenger autopsies are also useful, Kirschner said, if a victim's family sues for damages related to the crash. A medical examiner could determine whether the victim suffered in the moments before death, or survived in the minutes or hours after the crash." [JD: Yet, despite the established practice of examining the bodies of passengers, and carefully examining the body of the pilot, in order to determine if the pilot was drinking or on drugs, thus permitting the victims to sue in case of pilot misconduct ... despite these rules, the women's bodies were not even autopsied! Unbelieveable! Actually, I think it is quite believable, judging from the first JFK autopsy at Bethesda Naval Hospital, which was judged by the nation's best assassination researchers to be an outrageously appalling fraud -- a continuation of the assassination cover-up. That is exactly what this second JFK autopsy is showing iself to be, also.] John DiNardo ========================== Subject: 4th Person-JFK Flight Date: Sat, 24 Jul 1999 10:29:36 -0400 From: "Ronald T. Hannivig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> If this person, Kennedy's personal flight trainer, HAD BEEN on board,then obviously they died too. Is it possible this person had no relatives and so few friends, acquaintances and such that literally no one on earth would notice their passing? This seems impossible. <<< This simple, logical ... and concise question seems to fall into the general category of those missing 10 body-count victims at Columbine High School, and the total lack of any indication of a vehicle bomb being exploded across from the Federal Building in OKC. Let's include in this instance those who were nested on the Grassy Knoll. In this given instance - the obviously missing individual might have been a loner ... and therefore, nobody "out there" really pressing the issue. However, given his sheer importance to this case - should he still be alive, he would have been the most sought after individual by all of the major news networks' star reporters. One must seriously doubt there were only the three aboard this aircraft as this fourth individual was continually being cited in all of the initially aired reports. What obviously happens with these sort of breaking stories is that the press and media personnel simply do their their jobs in a professional manner - unrestricted by the pressure and critical supervision of those who "pull their strings". Remember, this story began to break early on a Saturday morning - when these supervisors were likely at home having breakfast and planning their weekend. However, given the intervening hours - from the time Kennedy radioed his position and intent to the tower on Martha's Vineyard and never arrived (approx. at 10:00 pm, Friday) ... to, let's say 7:00 am on Saturday (which is 9 full hours) when the press and media got wind of the story, left enough time for those in control to draft out a viable story if they had diligently worked on it overnight. What then could have happened - was that the underlings working the weekend shift took their jobs serious and acted responsibly ... by conducting their own research into the matter of JFK Jr's missing aircraft and in the process determining there was this cited fourth individual on board. Should this have been the case - this fourth individual ... who was a fully qualified and experienced pilot, had to be completely eliminated from the picture - else their agreed upon story-line (of Kennedy's questionable qualifications to fly this aircraft) would have been totally jeopardized once they had committed themselves to it. This missing guy must hold the current focus of the investigation - he obviously had existed at one time ... and from a report coming out of Ontario, he had accompanied Kennedy of a recent business flight to Toronto. Assuming they would have flown into Toronto International (a novice pilot might have shied away from flying into a busy airport ... but not with a instructor sitting in the copilot's seat - and anyway, Kennedy was still in a learning curve and would, therefore, have wanted an instructor aboard) and going with this assumption they both flew to Toronto, the Canadian immigration as well as the airport authorities would likely have some record of the brief visit on file in their computerized records. In closing: This cited individual is currently amongst us living ... or is dead - and as such, his whereabouts cannot remain in limbo. If alive, he would be a key witness. Ron Hannivig, Research - Investigative Journalist at-Large (unaccredited) Simpson, Pennsylvania - 18407
