-Caveat Lector-
It is our right,
and it is our duty,
to remain free.
--- Alan Keyes
Published in Washington, D.C. 5am -- August 5, 1999
www.washtimes.com
Clinton appointees meet privately
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
By Jerry Seper
THE WASHINGTON TIMES
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
The eight federal judges appointed by President Clinton to the U.S. District
Court in Washington meet privately every month in closed-door sessions that
other jurists believe are improper and call into question the court's
impartiality.
"I cannot imagine any legitimate reason for them to meet together once
a month, even socially," said one veteran courthouse official familiar with
the sessions.
"It's not only in bad taste, it certainly has the appearance of
impropriety. It's hard to imagine any rationale for these meetings."
Another court official said they "reek with impropriety."
Concern among courthouse officials about the meetings, which are
described in e-mail addressed monthly to each of the eight judges, comes at
a time that Chief U.S. District Judge Norma Holloway Johnson is being
publicly criticized for selectively assigning criminal cases against friends
and associates of Mr. Clinton's to judges the president has appointed.
None of the eight Clinton-appointed judges, all of whom were named to
the bench between 1994 to 1998, would comment on the meetings or their
content.
"I have no comment to make on these matters," said U.S. District Judge
Henry H. Kennedy Jr., the only one of the eight who personally answered a
telephone call. A spokeswoman for Judge Richard W. Roberts returned a call
but said only that the judge "declined comment."
Four judges appointed by other presidents, both Republican and
Democrat, said the meetings have been taking place for some time, although
specific topics are not known. They question the propriety of the sessions
and lament what they described as the "loss of collegiality" when the judges
fail to come together as a group -- which the others do often.
"The Clinton appointees have confirmed that they meet together, and we
know they do, but where they go and what they discuss I just don't know,"
said one judge. "But a very important part of what we do here is our
collegiality. We all come with political viewpoints but we try to leave
politics behind. Unfortunately, the Clinton appointees have gone off on
their own."
The nature of the isolation, another judge said, was punctuated by an
e-mail message sent to all of the judges inviting them to a birthday party
for U.S. District Judge Ricardo M. Urbina, a 1994 Clinton appointee. The
message asked the judges to guess Judge Urbina's age for a prize but
excluded members of the "Magnificent Seven" -- a name the first seven
Clinton appointees had used to describe their group before Judge Roberts'
1998 appointment.
There are 23 judges at the federal courthouse, including the eight
named by Mr. Clinton. Five were appointed by President Carter and five by
President Reagan. Four were named by President Johnson and one was picked by
President Nixon. None of the other judges hold separate meetings, courthouse
sources said.
Questions of impropriety at the courthouse have drawn the attention of
the Senate Judiciary Committee, whose chairman, Sen. Orrin G. Hatch, Utah
Republican, is considering whether to begin an investigation or call for
hearings to resolve the issue.
During a confirmation hearing yesterday for two Justice Department
officials, Mr. Hatch described as "deeply troubling" reports that Judge
Johnson had bypassed the court's random case assignment procedures "by
taking the unusual step of hand-picking" judges appointed by Mr. Clinton to
hear cases involving Webster L. Hubbell and Charles Yah Lin Trie.
"Even if deviations from the district court's random case assignment
procedures are technically permitted by local rule, I share the concern that
has been expressed by other judges on the court that these assignments will
damage the public's confidence that these cases were impartially
adjudicated," he said.
Committee member Sen. Jeff Sessions, Alabama Republican, echoed Mr.
Hatch's concerns, adding that as a former prosecutor he was "stunned" by the
Johnson assignments.
He said it "might be necessary" for the committee to investigate the
matter to restore the public's confidence.
On Tuesday, Judge Johnson defended her decision not to follow the
court's traditional random-assignment process when she assigned the Hubbell
and Trie cases to U.S. District Judges Paul L. Friedman and James
Robertson --both Clinton appointees.
She said the cases were assigned to "highly capable federal judges"
and that "politics was not and is never a factor in our case assignments."
She said the chief judge has the right to assign "protracted and
complex cases" when it is deemed necessary, noting that "my predecessors and
I have used this assignment system to enable our court to expeditiously
handle high-profile criminal cases with their unique demands on judicial
resources."
"It is the responsibility of the chief judge to move the docket as
expeditiously as possible. That is all that was intended by these
assignments," the judge said.
Some judges questioned whether the Hubbell and Trie cases, both of
which ended in plea agreements, could be considered protracted or complex.
They said several high-profile and lengthy trials have been assigned through
the random-selection process.
Judge Friedman, who has declined comment on the matter, threw out
several charges against Trie brought by the Justice Department's campaign
finance task force. Trie later pleaded guilty when the rulings were
overturned by the federal appeals court.
Judge Robertson was overturned in June when the appeals court
reinstated a felony charge against Hubbell for making false statements to
conceal his work on a fraudulent Arkansas land project. The court said the
judge erred when he dismissed the first count of a 15-count indictment
brought by Kenneth W. Starr.
http://www.washtimes.com/investiga/investiga1.html
Bard
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance�not soapboxing! These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
