-Caveat Lector-
Do I hear Monsanto (MS No Nato),
and give me a
Home School Legal Defense Fund
a
CHADD (children and adults with attention depisit disorder)
-- courting of homosexuals (lesibians) even to the extent
of someone putting out that Chelsie is suspected of being
a lesbian.
Why - look for an overseas article about infants developing brests
I heard of it - supposivly they put the picture of the infant
on the front cover and it caused a major contraversy overseas.
** Does anyone want to fill in any more blanks like
Dioxion tests
Monsanto Water control
Deep injection wells of hazardous chemicals
some people thinking that they can stay around with clonned
bodies for hundrends of years - need to get rid of some of the
new kids to do that of course.
HOW
Well Hitler was a ding bat - by the time of WW1 and 2
people like me and you had already been taken care of
who was Hitler shelling for? Parts of - -
Yale
Tarpley, Webster G. & Anton Chaiktin.
"The Unauthorized Biography of George Bush" 1992. 15 Apr. 99 <
"http://www.radix.net/~tarpley/bushb.htm#Table" >or the new link at
http://www.tarpley.net/bushb.htm
This book follows the Bush family connections
from 1914 to the present. From the time of George's grandfather,
Samuel P. Bush, the Bush family has attempted
to stay involved in politics. The book seems to show that since
the family could not rate by having royal blood
lines (that rate) or by having a high degree of education, that they would try
to control by a philosophy of "The one with
the most money makes the rules." They believe in "racial cleansing"
and have cultivated people like Adolph Hitler.
Ewall, Mike. "It's no accident that Coors is
the right beer in America." Corporate Accountability Project 12 Dec.
1995. 15 Apr. 1999 < http://www.corporations.org/coors/index.html >
Mike Ewall's article Should be titled "The Other
Adolph, Adolph Coors of Coors beer." This article details Coors
connections with Ex-President Bush and how
Coors and Bush both have a policy of "Racial
Cleansing." Coors is
anti-environmental, anti-gay and seemingly
against anything and anyone that stands in their way of making
money.
Rockefeller Drug Censor Empire
< ftp://ftp.tetrahedron.org/pub/Rockefeller_Drug_Censor_Empire.txt >
Das GOAT wrote:
> -Caveat Lector-
>
> It's been thoroughly documented by now that estrogen-mimicking chemicals
> in the environment (human beings are awash in them) are causing gender role
> reversals, loss of interest in sex and/or sterility, and weakening of the
> immune system in fish, reptiles, amphibians, and mammals. The "big news" in
> today's headlines is that Establishment Science is finally admitting that the
> same effects COULD occur in human beings (being mammals TOO) -- but
> Establishment Science refuses to extrapolate further, insisting that it dare
> not draw any conclusions until after ANOTHER GENERATION of study ...
> In many newspapers, that situation is being "spun" to sound as if the
> link between certain sexual abnormalities in human beings and environmental
> pollution has now been DISproven, or "is NOT PROVEN," at minimum. But that
> is NOT the case -- quite the opposite, when you read the fine print -- if the
> newspaper hasn't selectively omitted it.
> It's just that, frankly, the scientific community is FREAKING OUT at the
> implications.
>
> Some Chemical Exposure OK for Humans
>
> By H. JOSEF HEBERT
>
> WASHINGTON (AP) - While adverse health impacts cannot be ruled out, there is
> insufficient evidence to suggest that exposure to hormone-disrupting
> chemicals will produce additional cancers or infertility, a scientific panel
> says.
>
> The panel of the National Academy of Sciences in a report issued Tuesday
> emphasized that more research was needed about the possible harmful effects
> from exposure to these chemicals known as ``endocrine disrupters.''
>
> The academy's 16-member research panel said that while it was clear that
> exposure to the chemicals at high concentrations could adversely affect
> wildlife and human health, ``the extent of harm caused ... in concentrations
> that are common in the environment is debated.''
>
> Environmentalists and a large number of health experts have argued that there
> was growing evidence that a wide range of synthetic chemicals affect estrogen
> levels and even at low doses could lead to cancers, neurological problems and
> infertility.
>
> As a result, the Environmental Protection Agency has directed a massive
> screening of more than 15,000 chemicals to try to determine what is the
> greatest risks from human's exposure to these agents in the environment. The
> screening and tests, which will be conducted by industry, is expected to take
> three or four years.
>
> Some researchers have cautioned that these compounds at low doses over many
> years may increase breast cancer, a decline in sperm counts and reproductive
> disorders in males.
>
> But the academy's research committee found as yet no clear link between such
> exposure and these ailments in humans, according to the 414-page report.
> While additional studies were needed, it said the current literature did not
> support an association between exposure to low levels of these chemicals and
> breast cancer or a variety of other hormonally sensitive cancers.
>
> The panel acknowledged that there was evidence of adverse reproductive and
> developmental effects in wildlife and laboratory animals because of exposure
> to endocrine-disrupting chemicals. Again, it said no such link could be
> determined with current research data in humans at exposure levels found
> generally in the environment.
>
> Similarly, the panel agreed there was ample evidence that fetal exposure to
> high doses of these chemicals - such as exposure to high amounts of
> pesticides in fish or other foods - had been found to hinder nervous system
> development in humans as well as birds and animals.
>
> But the study said the data on the effects of these chemicals on human
> nervous system development at levels in the environment was insufficient to
> make a definitive conclusion.
>
> In all these areas, the panel said additional studies were needed, especially
> on children whose mothers were exposed to such chemical agents during
> pregnancy.
>
> ``Determining the risks to humans from contact with these chemicals in the
> environment is difficult because ordinary exposure of these agents has not
> been routinely monitored,'' said University of Texas researcher Ernst Knobil,
> who was chairman of the panel.
>
> But several scientists, including a member of the panel, interviewed Monday
> said the data on which the study was based was now two years old and that
> more recent research suggested a closer link between endocrine-disrupting
> chemicals and human health.
>
> There is a ``plausibility of human harm'' that cannot be ignored, Frederick
> vom Saal, a professor of biological sciences at the University of Missouri,
> said in a telephone interview.
>
> Vom Saal, who was a member of the research panel, said the degree to which
> there is consensus on the affects of these chemicals at the molecular level
> on wildlife and on laboratory animals suggests the likelihood of impact on
> humans as well.
>
> Peter deFur, an environmental biologist at the Virginia Commonwealth
> University who reviewed the report, said more recent research not covered by
> the study implies ``a closer link to human health'' impacts than the study
> suggests.
>
> ``There is a tremendous amount of research activity going on a number of
> these questions,'' he said.
>
> Toxic chemicals could lead to low female sex drive
>
> LONDON (Reuters) - Exposure to toxic chemicals while in the womb could
> explain low sex drives in women, New Scientist magazine said Wednesday.
>
> The magazine cited a study by zoologists at Michigan State University which
> said female rats that were exposed to PCBs (polychlorinated biphenyls) in the
> womb seemed reluctant to mate as adults.
>
> ``This raises the possibility that similar chemical contaminants may cause
> low sex drives in women,'' it said.
>
> PCBs are toxic chemicals which may indicate the presence of cancer-causing
> dioxins. Belgium's recent dioxin food scare was triggered when tests revealed
> the presence of PCBs in animal feeds.
>
> Zoologists Yu-Wen Chung and Lynwood Clemens tested the effects on rats of two
> commercial PCBs, Aroclor 1221 and 1254.
>
> They injected 40 pregnant rats with either pure sesame oil or a mixture of
> oil and the PCBs at different points during and after pregnancy. They then
> studied the behavior of the female offspring.
>
> Chung suspects that during a crucial phase of development, the
> estrogen-mimicking A1221 ``defeminizes'' the rat fetuses. She says women's
> sex drives could also be affected by PCB exposure in the womb,'' New
> Scientist said.
>
> ``It's possible. Pregnancy is the critical period,'' Chung told the magazine.
>
> New Scientist said PCBs were once widely used in the production of
> pesticides, lubricants and plastics.
>
> Their use was banned in many countries after it became clear that some PCBs
> mimic hormones but there is strong evidence that they are still widespread in
> the environment, it said.
>
> ``Female rats normally adopt a stereotypical posture when copulating, raising
> their back and hindquarters to help the male mate,'' Chung told the magazine.
>
> But rats injected with A1221 did not do this as often as rats exposed to
> A1254 or those not exposed to either PCB.
>
> A second test paired female and large male rats in a cage with two
> compartments. If the females did not feel like mating, they could escape into
> the second chamber through a hole too small for the larger males.
>
> Females exposed to A1221 left the males more often and took longer to return
> after each copulation attempt by the males.
>
> But Paul Stewart, a psychologist at the State University of New York, told
> New Scientist that PCBs in humans were usually at much lower levels than
> those used in the tests.
>
> ``He also questions whether PCBs were lowering the rats' overall levels of
> activity rather than just their sex drive,'' the magazine said.
--
Any person can stand adversity,
The true test is to give a person power.
http://freeweb.digiweb.com/science_fiction/ThePiedPiper/~index.htm
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance�not soapboxing! These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
