-Caveat Lector-

------- Forwarded Message Follows -------

National Center For Policy Analysis
DAILY POLICY DIGEST
Thursday, August 5, 1999

PointCast can automatically load NCPA's Policy Digest summaries
on your desktop for easy reading.  For information go to
http://www.ncpa.org/pointcast.html

IN TODAY'S DIGEST

   o   SUNSPOT CYCLES CORRELATE WITH GLOBAL TEMPERATURE
       INCREASES, say some scientists....GEORGE C. MARSHALL
       INSTITUTE/WALL STREET JOURNAL

   o   CLINTON PROPOSES $95 BILLION IN NEW TAXES AND $1.032
       TRILLION SPENDING INCREASES, says former Federal Reserve
       governor Lawrence B. Lindsey....AMERICAN ENTERPRISE
       INSTITUTE/WALL STREET JOURNAL

   o   THE NUMBER OF LAWYERS IS FAST APPROACHING ONE MILLION, and
       restrictions on legal actions are increasing....NEW YORK
       TIMES

   o   THE AVERAGE U.S. FAMILY SPENDS 14 PERCENT OF INCOME ON
       FOOD, but poverty figures assume the poor spend one-third
       -- which may inflate the number in poverty....INVESTOR'S
       BUSINESS DAILY

   o   SAUDI ARABIAN OIL COSTS $1.50 A BARREL TO PRODUCE and
       sells for more than $15 a barrel; but U.S. companies
       accuse the Saudis of dumping it....NEW YORK TIMES

   o   PROJECTED SPACE STATION COSTS ARE MORE THAN $100 BILLION,
       up from an estimated $8 billion for a grander project in
       1984.....WEEKLY STANDARD

IN TODAY'S NEWS

The SUN'S ROLE IN GLOBAL WARMING

Those who promote the controversial theory that the Earth is
getting warmer due to burning of fossil fuels are overlooking an
important factor, scientists say: the changing nature of the sun.

Computer simulations say the "greenhouse effect" should have
raised the global temperature by about one degree Celsius -- or
1.8 degrees Fahrenheit -- over the past 100 years.  But in fact
temperatures rose 0.5 degrees C over the century, peaking before
1940.  Then it decreased until the 1970s, and has since risen a
modest 0.2 degrees C.  Experts point out that because more than
80 percent of manmade carbon dioxide entered the air since the
1940s, the earlier warming of 0.5 degrees C must be natural.

Sunspots may very well be that natural factor:

   o   The sun is brightest during peak sunspot periods -- which
       change every 11 years or so, making for a 22-year magnetic
       cycle.

   o   Studies show that changes in the cycle correlate closely
       to changes in North American land temperatures over three
       centuries.

   o   If recent NASA data are indicative, changes in the sun's
       magnetism track changes in the sun's brightness.

   o   If this is so, changes in the sunspot cycle would explain
       the average temperature change of 0.5 degrees Celsius over
       the past 100 years.

Changes in the cycle also correspond to temperature variations
over many millennia.  Sunspots were rare from about 1640 to 1710
-- a period which coincides with the coldest century of the
millennium.

While we lack temperature data for other centuries, the role of
sunspots in climate change can be inferred from historical
fluctuations of wheat prices.  In periods of few sunspots, the
climate gets colder.  Indeed, five prolonged periods of few
sunspots coincides with periods of higher wheat prices in
England.

Source: Sallie Baliunas (George C. Marshall Institute, Mt. Wilson
Observatory), "Why So Hot? Don't Blame Man, Blame the Sun," Wall
Street Journal, August 5, 1999.

For NCPA's Global Warming Hotline go to
http://www.ncpa.org/hotlines/global/gwhot.html

QUICK, SPEND THE SURPLUS BEFORE TAXPAYERS GRAB IT

That is essentially the view of the tax-and-spend crowd in
Washington, economists warn.  While Federal Reserve Chairman Alan
Greenspan has come down on the side of delaying a tax cut until
the economy needs it, he has also made it clear that a major
increase in outlays "is the worst of all possible worlds from a
fiscal-policy point of view, and, under all conditions, should be
avoided."

He went on to add in recent testimony that he has "great sympathy
for those who wish to cut taxes now to preempt that process, and
indeed, if it turns out they are right, then I would say that
moving on the tax front makes good sense to me."

But former Federal Reserve governor Lawrence B. Lindsey warns
that spending more is exactly what President Clinton has in mind.

   o   Clinton calls for a 10 year spending increase of $1.032
       trillion -- offset by a further $95 billion increase in
       taxes.

   o   Thus he uses $937 billion of the projected surplus to grow
       government.

   o   By contrast, the congressional budget resolution calls for
       cutting taxes by $778 billion and spending by $59 billion,
       reserving $218 billion for deficit reduction -- more than
       the president's.

   o   In the past four fiscal years, inflation-adjusted domestic
       spending has actually increased $74 billion -- although
       partially offset by a $34 billion cut in real defense
       spending.

At the same time, real tax receipts have soared $312 billion.

So this recent history strongly suggests that with a tax-cut
delay, politicians will fast find a way to spend the surplus
before it can be returned to taxpayers.

Source: Lawrence B. Lindsey (American Enterprise Institute),
"Whose Surplus Is It, Anyway?" Wall Street Journal, August 5,
1999.

For more on Current Tax Legislation
http://www.ncpa.org/pi/congress/cong2.html

BACKLASH AGAINST LAWYERS

Critics say that lawyers who have grown more arrogant and the
enormous fees they are reaping have set the stage for an anti-
lawyer backlash.  That backlash may already be here.

Courts, state legislatures and Congress have barred certain types
of suits entirely and tried to limit the type of advice lawyers
can give.  New federal and state laws and court decisions, for
example, make it harder to bring certain kinds of personal injury
suits, limit the legal arguments available in immigration cases
and curtail civil rights suits on behalf of prisoners.

Laws that went into effect in 1996 forbid all government-financed
lawyers for the poor to file class-action suits, challenge
welfare reform legislation or lobby on behalf of their clients.

   o   The legal profession now amounts to a $130 billion
       business.

   o   Just 20 years ago, there were 3 lawyers for every 1,000
       adult Americans -- now there are more than 4.6 and the
       total number of lawyers and judges practicing is fast
       approaching 1 million.

   o   Gross revenues of the country's 100 largest law firms more
       than doubled to $23.1 billion last year from $10.6 billion
       in 1988.

   o   The 1,467 partners of the largest 13 firms made annual
       profits of more than $1 million per partner.

One limitation on lawyers that has drawn particular attention is
a two-year-old federal law known as "Granny's Lawyer Goes to
Jail."  It declares that any lawyer who advises an elderly person
how to give away property to qualify for need-based Medicaid
benefits is guilty of a crime.  Last year, a federal district
court declared it unconstitutional -- but it remains on the
books.

Source: William Glaberson, "Lawyers Contend with State and
Federal Efforts to Restrict Their Rising Power," New York Times,
August 5, 1999.

For more on Lawyers
http://www.ncpa.org/pd/law/legsys/index3c.html

PROBLEMS IN DEFINING THE "POOR"

When President Lyndon Johnson launched his war on poverty in the
1960s, the first order of business was coming up with a
definition of who was poor.  Experts say the poverty level set by
the Census Bureau is out of whack.  "The Census numbers seriously
overstate the poverty problem," in the opinion of W. Michael Cox
of the Dallas Federal Reserve Bank.

"The Census leaves out a lot of things that look like income and
that act like income," says Gary Burtless of the Brookings
Institution.

   o   Census counts only cash income, including government cash
       aid -- leaving out food stamps and housing subsidies.

   o   But it also doesn't subtract taxes from income.

   o   The calculations of the poverty level assume families
       spend one-third of income on food -- as was the case in
       the 1960s -- but food prices have actually dropped
       compared with other goods, to the point where the average
       family now devotes just 14 percent of its household budget
       to food.

   o   Since the average family is typically larger than the
       average poverty family, it is cheaper than government
       figures indicate for the average low-income family to feed
       itself.

The Census Bureau sets the poverty line for an adult living alone
at $8,480 annually.  For two adults, the poverty line is $10,915.
For two adults with two children, the amount is $13,133.

That means that about 11.6 percent of American families are poor,
by Census standards.

Source: Charles Oliver, "Even Amid Signs of U.S. Plenty, Debate
Over Poverty is Hot Topic," Investor's Business Daily, August 5,
1999.

For more on Wealth and Poverty
http://www.ncpa.org/pd/economy/econ12.html

AN ABSURD CLAIM THAT OIL IS BEING "DUMPED" HERE

The Commerce Department is scheduled to hear complaints from 12
independent oil producers that Saudi Arabia, Mexico, Iraq and
Venezuela are selling oil in the U.S. for less than what they
spend to produce it.  Serious economists say the charge should be
laughed off the department's docket.

But they fear it won't.  That's because anti-dumping laws are so
stacked in favor of domestic companies that government agencies
in charge of adjudicating trade cases almost always side against
foreigners.  "When it comes to dumping, economically ludicrous
cases prevail all the time," says Philip K. Verleger, an
economist for the Brattle Group of consultants.

Here's what makes the charge of oil-dumping ludicrous to
economists:

   o   Since oil is priced in a world market, a producer could
       never hope to recoup his losses from selling below cost
       because he could never raise his prices to above-market
       levels to recoup those losses in the future.

   o   Since the oil market is world-wide, a tax slapped on four
       countries would only rearrange oil export-import patterns
       -- not affecting supplies and prices over all.

   o   Saudi Arabia spends only about $1.50 to produce a barrel
       of oil that sells for about $15, putting to flight the
       charge it is losing money.

   o   Selling below costs is sometimes cited as a tactic to
       drive a competitor out of business -- but the U.S. oil
       industry need not worry.

It is a common practice and perfectly legal for U.S. companies
during times of economic slack to cut prices so as to generate
enough cash to cover their operating expenses, even if they lose
money temporarily.  But when a foreign company does so and sells
over here, it violates U.S. anti-dumping laws.

Political observers point out that the last thing presidential
candidate Al Gore needs is for an administration department to
announce that it doesn't think Americans are paying enough at the
gas pump and the home heating depot.

Source: Michael M. Weinstein, "Oil and Those Slippery Anti-
Dumping Laws," New York Times, August 5, 1999.

For more on Tariffs and Other Trade Barriers
http://www.ncpa.org/pd/trade/trade8.html

IN OTHER NEWS

SPACE STATION WOES

When President Reagan proposed a space station in 1984, he used
the National Aeronautics and Space Administration's assumptions
that it would cost $8 billion, make possible major discoveries in
eight scientific fields, and be completed by 1992.

The actuality has fallen far short of those goals, say critics.

   o   Nearly $30 billion has been spent so far, but only two of
       the almost 40 main parts have been installed.

   o   Although the low-orbit station has been vastly scaled
       down, projected costs have ballooned to over $100 billion.

   o   Its science mission has been scaled back to only one, and
       the completion date has been pushed back to 2005.

Critics say that the problems building the space station come on
the heels of the failure of the 30-year space shuttle program to
accomplish its goals.

   o   In 1982, NASA predicted that by 1992 the space shuttle
       would have flown over "400 times carrying payloads for
       military, scientific, and private industry customers."

   o   The 1986 Challenger disaster ended NASA's role as a
launch
       provider to all but itself and its international partners

       on the space station.

   o   The shuttle system that was supposed to fly 51 times a
       year when it was sold to the nation in 1972 will fly only

       four times this year -- at a cost of $4 billion.

And because the shuttle is cost prohibitive for commercial
satellite launches, American businesses use European companies
for launch services.

Critics say claims have also been inflated for the next-
generation
shuttle, Lockheed Martin's X-33.  The X-33 is supposed to be
produced for industry customers after Lockheed builds a taxpayer-

funded demonstrator.  But Lockheed is now asking for government
loan guarantees -- and Sen. John Breaux (D-La.) has introduced
the Space Launch Cost Reduction Act to provide them.

Just as with the airplane, microcomputer and satellite
communications, critics suggest private enterprise should be
given the opportunity to take over civilian space operations,
bear the risks and reap the rewards.

Source: Robert G. Oler, Richard Kolker and Mark Whittington,
"Thirty Years of Ineptitude," Weekly Standard, July 26, 1999.

For more on Other Spending Programs
http://www.ncpa.org/pd/budget/budget-7.html

*****************************************************************
*****
                  NATIONAL CENTER FOR POLICY ANALYSIS
                            DALLAS, TEXAS

                    "Making Ideas Change the World"

                           Internet Address:
                          http://www.ncpa.org
*****************************************************************
*****


A<>E<>R
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The only real voyage of discovery consists not in seeking
new landscapes but in having new eyes. -Marcel Proust
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said
it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your
own reason and your common sense." --Buddha
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
A merely fallen enemy may rise again, but the reconciled
one is truly vanquished. -Johann Christoph Schiller,
                                       German Writer (1759-1805)
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
It is preoccupation with possessions, more than anything else, that
prevents us from living freely and nobly. -Bertrand Russell
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Everyone has the right...to seek, receive and impart
information and ideas through any media and regardless
of frontiers."
Universal Declaration of Human Rights
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Always do sober what you said you'd do drunk. That will
teach you to keep your mouth shut."
--- Ernest Hemingway
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Forwarded as information only; no endorsement to be presumed
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material
is distributed without charge or profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this type of information
for non-profit research and educational purposes only.

DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance�not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to