-Caveat Lector-
Dear Ms. Hall:
You are massively misinformed.
Fluoride is RAT POISON. In no way should it be CONSUMED.
Limited topical treatment with Fluoride and proper poison-containment
barrier methods is one thing- I am not prepared to condemn such practice..
PROVIDED that the barrier methods are used to prevent ingestion of POISON.
Please find ONE acceptably objective scientific survey PROVING fluoridated
water supply to be beneficial to teeth.
You will not find ONE, because NONE exist. On the contrary, accurate
anectdotal surveys abound, which indicate a GREATER cost of dental care in
FLUORIDATED communities.
Does this not tell you something?
Open your mind to the truth, if you dare.
VERY, VERY MUCH information is available, in scientifically peer-reviewed
form- of the DEFINITE and PROVEN danger/damage caused by ingestion of (rat
poison) FLUORIDE.
I pity you if you cannot see the truth, laid plain before your eyes
A mind is a terrible thing to waste... and fluoride is PROVEN to be a
mind-wasting toxin.
Thank dangerous elements within the government and the ADA (American Dental
Association) for inflicting it upon the populace.
Some SMALL thanks may be given to several government agencies, such as
FDA, who states FLUORIDE is an "UNAPPROVED DRUG/additive."
EPA, who states that FLUORIDE containing products must be labelled as
POISONS, and that fluoride is a TERATOGEN.
ADA is criminally liable for perpetrating a fraud of incredible proportions
on the populace with the collusion of SOME government agencies. At last
notice, ADA fraudulently claimed both FDA and EPA approval for municipally
fluoridated water.
All of this is public record, and easily proven... with the possible
exception of some still-classified government research from the Manhattan
Project, which first revealed sodium-fluoride to be an extremely deleterious
chemical toxin in association with government ordered tests related to
atomic bomb projects... which information, via government sponsored tests,
has obviously been in the possession of U.S. "security interests" for 50
years... enough is available via Fredom of Information Act requests to
prove the basic facts as stated. (keywords: uranium hexaFLUORIDE,
hydroFLUORIC gas & acid, cesium fluoride)
Fluoride is a by-product of the nuclear industry (a form of nuclear waste)
and also a toxic waste by-product of the aluminum industry, and also a toxic
waste by-product of the artificial chemical fertilizer industry.
Converting "toxic waste" (per EPA {U.S. Environmental Protection Agency})
into an "unapproved drug/additive" (per FDA {U.S. Food and Drug
Administration}) by selling it to municipalities is a major financial coup.
A small municipal water supplier states 1997 yearly facts:
Total Fluoride (12,383.6 kg) 27,276.7 lbs
dispensed in (3,235,880.0 m3) 711,808,180.0 Imp. Gal
Over thirteen TONS of toxic waste successfully "disposed" of in one small
municipality in one year- the "savings" to industry by virtually donating
this poison (cost to municipalities, approx. $200/ton, roughly equivalent to
SHIPPING costs.... and shipped in containers marked POISON XX per Federal
regulations) is ASTRONOMICAL. How much per ton would it cost to legally
dispose of pure RAT POISON in an ETHICAL manner? $10,000 per ton? more?
less? maybe only $5,000? -- in any case, the "savings" to the nuclear,
aluminum, fertilizer and other industries who would have had to pay
thousands of dollars PER ton to dispose of it "safely."
Approximate amount of toxic waste Fluoride thus diverted from safe disposal
and into the municipal water delivered to approximately 140 million U.S.
residents is 40,000 TONS- hundreds of millions of dollars in savings to
toxic producing industries.
"When The WINDS asked Dr. Lee why, according to his research into the
controversy, he thought there was so much political force driving the
fluoridation movement, the physician/scientist said, "It's a toxic waste
product of many types of industry; for instance, glass production, phosphate
fertilizer production and many others. They would have no way to dispose of
the tons of fluoride waste they produce unless they could find some use for
it, so they made up this story about it being good for dental health. Then
they can pass it through everyone's bodies and into the sewer." [A novel
approach to toxic waste disposal--just feed it to the people and let their
bodies "detoxify" it]. "It is a well coordinated effort," Dr. Lee added, "to
keep it from being declared for what it is--a toxic waste."
more:
http://asheville-computer.com/issues/fluoride-toxic-waste.html
http://asheville-computer.com/issues/
Dave Hartley
http://www.Asheville-Computer.com
http://www.ioa.com/~davehart
-----Original Message-----
From: N. Hall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 1999 7:45 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: fluoride
Dear Dave:
I too live in N.C. and object to the implications suggested by the fluoride
report. I did not see mention that different parts of the country, or
counties, have varying amount of fluoride present in the water supply.
I am a Dental Hygienist with 43 years of experience, and have seen the worst
of both ends of the spectrum -- eiher too much fluoride present in teeth, or
too little. I can assure you that some of your facts were not accurate,
i.e., SOME fluoride stains can be lightened by bleaching and thus some
improvement. Some cannot be changed other than dental interventions.
You may have never seen children's teeth who had was no fluoride
availble in their water. Pretty sorry opportunity for a lifetime of
smiling and eating.
Coastal areas tend to be lower in Fl than mountain areas.
I don't know what your particular beef is, but I would suggest you put a
caution on your articles such as this. It loses credibility when not
properly reported with all the facts.
Although it is true that we don't know the damage that can be done to the
rest of the body -- there is a poisoning by excess amounts of any
chemical -- but we do know the bones of the elderly benefit from some
amounts of Fluoride.
novellah
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing! These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
