-Caveat Lector-

Via
personalUpdate from Free-Market.Net

>
> =====> Senate Judiciary Committee holds hearing on Internet hate
> Country: United States
>    U.S. Senators are once again looking for an escape clause in the
>    First Amendment that would allow them to restrict online speech
>    that they don't like. (9/16/99)
> URL: http://www.freedomforum.org/speech/1999/9/15hate.asp


> Senate Judiciary Committee holds hearing on Internet hate
>
> By David Hudson
> First Amendment Center
>
> 9.15.99
>
> � What do you think? Have your say in The Forum.
>
>
>
> "We need to examine what can be done about hate on the Internet, within the
> constraints imposed by the First Amendment," Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., said at
> a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing yesterday on hate and the Internet.
>
> Several of the panelists told the committee that the Internet poses special
> problems for those committed to combating hate speech and hate crimes. Michael
> Gennaco, an assistant U.S. attorney in California, told the committee that "the
> Internet has created a whole new class of criminals."
>
> "The Internet offers a medium of communication where a skilled user can spew out
> hate-laced threats to countless victims throughout the country with little
> effort," said Gennaco.
>
> Other panelists echoed those sentiments. "In 1999, the Internet can serve as a
> terrorism tutor," said Rabbi Abraham Cooper, associate dean of the Simon
> Wiesenthal Center, a Jewish anti-hate group.
>
> Joseph T. Roy Sr. of the Southern Poverty Law Center, an anti-hate, watchdog
> group, testified to the extraordinary growth of Web sites on the Internet that
> spew hate. Roy also said that the Internet allows white supremacists and other
> hate groups the opportunity to present their messages in an alluring fashion and
> with "unprecedented access."
>
> Gennaco, who represented the government in the first prosecution ever under a
> federal hate-crime law involving threats transmitted over the Internet,
> acknowledged that the First Amendment protects much "despicable" speech.
>
> Other panelists emphasized that the push to combat hate on the Internet must be
> tempered by our nation's tolerance of all kinds of speech and by the First
> Amendment.
>
> "First, we want the Internet to thrive; and we believe that the Internet, by its
> nature, cannot thrive in a climate of censorship or heavy-handed government
> regulation," said Wade Henderson, executive director of the Leadership
> Conference on Civil Rights.
>
> Henderson noted that the First Amendment was crucial to the success of the civil
> rights movement, a time "when the message of the civil rights movement was seen
> as subversive or offensive."
>
> "There was a time when our leaders invoked the constitutional principle of free
> speech to confront threats of censorship and repression," he said. "Now that we
> are in the mainstream, and the bigots are on the fringes, we will not abandon
> the principles and protections that brought us to where we are today."
>
> Several panelists testified that hate-crimes legislation must distinguish
> between hate speech and hate crimes based on harmful conduct. "Until a
> hate-monger crosses the line from speech to action, he is cloaked in the
> protection of the federal Constitution," Henderson said.
>
> Leahy said he recognized this distinction in his support of the Hate Crimes
> Prevention Act, a bill that would increase penalties for those who commit crimes
> and for those who recruit juveniles to commit such crimes. "The Hate Crimes
> Prevention Act is a tool for combating acts of violence and threats of violence
> motivated by hatred and bigotry," he said. "The Constitution does not permit
> Congress to prohibit the expression of an idea because it is harmful."
>
> Sen. Orrin Hatch, chairman of the committee, agreed that First Amendment
> considerations play a significant role when determining the constitutionality of
> anti-hate regulations. "And with the First Amendment as our country's first
> premise, we know that any solutions we endorse must recognize that the surest
> way to defeat the message of hate is to hold it under the harsh light of public
> scrutiny."
>
> Leahy added that "when it comes to hate on the Internet, the problem is the
> message, not the medium."


<< Of course, we could just go back to the 'good ol' days' and avoid being able
to identify any groups that are condiered the 'offenders'.  Turn on the light
and risk having it be too bright (at any intensity) or leave it off and
complain about being in the dark.  Go Orrin!  A<>E<>R >>

A<>E<>R
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The only real voyage of discovery consists not in seeking
new landscapes but in having new eyes. -Marcel Proust
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said
it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your
own reason and your common sense." --Buddha
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
A merely fallen enemy may rise again, but the reconciled
one is truly vanquished. -Johann Christoph Schiller,
                                       German Writer (1759-1805)
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
It is preoccupation with possessions, more than anything else, that
prevents us from living freely and nobly. -Bertrand Russell
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Everyone has the right...to seek, receive and impart
information and ideas through any media and regardless
of frontiers."
Universal Declaration of Human Rights
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Always do sober what you said you'd do drunk. That will
teach you to keep your mouth shut."
--- Ernest Hemingway
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Forwarded as information only; no endorsement to be presumed
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material
is distributed without charge or profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this type of information
for non-profit research and educational purposes only.

DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance�not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to