-Caveat Lector-
Professor Israel Shahak about Jewish "Religion"
Bookreview:
When the Roman historian Tacitus pointed out 19 centuries ago that the Jews
are unique among the peoples of the world in their intense hatred and
contempt for all peoples but their own, he was only repeating what many other
scholars had discovered before him. For the next 1,900 years other
investigators came to similar conclusions, either from a study of the Jews'
religious writings or from a study of the Jews' behavior toward non-Jews.
Notable among these was the reformer, Martin Luther, who in 1543 wrote in
"Von den Juden und Ihren Lugen":
"Does not their Talmud say, and do not their rabbis write, that it is no
sin to kill if a Jew kills a heathen, but it is a sin if he kills a
brother in Israel? It is no sin if he does not keep his oath to a
heathen. Therefore, to steal and rob, as they do with their usury, from
a heathen is a divine service. For they hold that they cannot be too
hard on us nor sin against us, because they are of the noble blood and
circumcised saints; we, however, are cursed goyim. And they are the
masters of the world, and we are their servants, yea, their cattle...
"Should someone think that I am saying too much, I am not saying too
much, but much too little. For I see in their writings how they curse us
goyim and wish us all evil in their schools and their prayers."
The Jews responded to Luther like they responded to all the others. They put
him down as just another "hater," blinded by religious bigotry. And today
that's still the Jews' standard answer to everyone who says or writes
anything about them except the most fawning praise.
When British newsman William Cash, Los Angeles correspondent for London's
Daily Telegraph, reported late last year in a magazine article the simple
fact that the executives in Hollywood's motion picture industry are nearly
all Jews, they shrieked at him, "Hater!" and denied his fact. When famous
actor Marlon Brando later repeated the same fact, he was as well attacked for
being an "anti-Semite".
Thus, Israel Shahak's book "Jewish History, Jewish Religion: The Weight of
3,000 Years" is all the more important for being a document by a
aknowledgeable Jew -- a Jewish "insider" -- about the beliefs and behavior of
his fellow Jews. Born in Warsaw in 1933, Shahak spent a portion of his
childhood in the concentration camp in Belsen, from which he immigrated to
Palestine in 1945. He grew up in Israel, served in the Israeli military, and
became a chemistry professor. Like all Israelis, he became fluent in Hebrew.
He also became acclimated to the peculiar moral atmosphere of Israeli
society: a combination of overweening arrogance and deceit, a mixture of
pugnacious self-righteousness and duplicity.
Unlike his fellow Israelis, however, Professor Shahak is deeply troubled by
this peculiar atmosphere. Whereas the Jews around him take it for granted
that the goyim on whom they depend for economic, military, and diplomatic
support are too stupid ever to figure out what the Jews think about them and
say about them behind their backs and plan to do to them when they can, and
too sheeplike ever to take effective action if they do figure it out, he
worries. He remembers that the Romans figured it out, and they consequently
sacked Jerusalem and ended their cult in Palestine. He remembers that the
Germans figured it out, and that's why he became an involuntary tenant in a
concentration camp. He's worried that if his fellow Jews continue behaving as
they always have, they will get themselves into some really serious trouble
-- again.
In particular, Professor Shahak is concerned about the behavior of those of
his people who adhere to "Judaism". He is not one of these himself, and so he
is able to look with some degree of objectivity at the mixture of
superstition, Jewish chauvinism, and hatred of non-Jews which makes up the
Jewish religion and its sacred writings. He deplores traditional Jewish
teachings, not only because of the danger that some new Martin Luther will
come along and spill the beans to the Gentiles, but because of the
spiritually debilitating effect these teachings have had on the Jews
themselves. Of the world of medieval Jewry in Europe, the world of the ghetto
and the shtetl which modern Jewish writers refer to in euphoric tones as a
world of quaint tradition and piety, Shahak says: "It was a world sunk in the
most abject superstition, fanaticism, and ignorance ..."
He cites a number of specific instances of the ways in which Jewish religious
authorities have kept their flocks under control. In general, the rabbis have
taught their fellow Jews that their Gentile neighbors are spiritually and
morally unclean; that they are subhuman, on a level with the beasts of the
field; and that they hate Jews and must be hated in return. Jews are taught
that the Christian religion is a religion fit only for animals, and that its
founder, Jesus, was the son of a prostitute and is presently immersed in a
pit of boiling excrement in hell.
Among the Hassidim (Hebrew for "pious ones") all of these teachings are kept
current. Shahak points out that a central thesis of the Hassidic doctrine is
that only Jews are human beings, and that the universe was created for them
alone. Non-Jews were created only to be used by Jews. Although this teaching
about the subhumanity of Gentiles is most open and explicit among the
bearded, sidelocked, black-hatted Orthodox Jews that one sees in Jewish
strongholds such as New York City, it comes from the core of Jewish tradition
and is accepted to a greater or lesser degree by all pious Jews. It is, for
example, a specific tenet of the Jewish Defense League and is cited in the
membership handbook for that group.
Especially frustrating to Professor Shahak is the clever deception which his
fellow Jews use to conceal the true nature of Judaism from their Gentile
neighbors. Regarding the veil of false piety which conceals from Gentile eyes
the malevolent doctrine of the Hassidim, he writes: "A chief deceiver in this
case, and a good example of the power of deception, was Martin Buber. His
numerous works eulogizing the whole Hassidic movement (including Habbad)
never so much as hint at the real doctrines of Hassidism concerning
non-Jews." Buber (1878-1965) promoted Hassidism in Germany during the rise of
the National Socialists -- in fact, until 1938, when he left for Palestine --
and Shahak considers Buber's efforts, despite their deceptiveness, at least
partly responsible for the National Socialist reaction to the Jews.
Another example of Jewish deception given by Professor Shahak concerns the
etymology of the Yiddish word for a Gentile girl, shiksa. He cites the
popular English-language book "The Joys of Yiddish" (New York, 1968), by Leo
Rosten, which tells its readers that shiksa comes from the Hebrew word
sheqetz, meaning "blemish". Writes Shahak, "This is a barefaced lie, as every
speaker of Hebrew knows. The Megiddo Modern Hebrew-English Dictionary,
published in Israel, correctly defines sheqetz as follows: 'unclean animal;
loathsome creature, abomination...' "
Professor Shahak writes with passion. He evidently feels that liberating Jews
everywhere from the shackles of their misanthropic superstitions and freeing
Israeli state policy in particular from the stifling influence of Judaism is
a matter of some urgency. He focuses our attention especially on the inherent
hatefulness of Judaism with citations from a number of Jewish religious
writings.
In a chapter titled "The Laws against Non-Jews," he writes:
"...[T]he Halakhah, that is the legal system of classical Judaism -- as
practiced by practically all Jews from the 9th century to the end of the
18th and as maintained to this very day in the form of Orthodox Judaism
-- is based primarily on the Babylonian Talmud. However, because of the
unwieldy complexity of the legal disputations recorded in the Talmud,
more manageable codifications of talmudic law became necessary ... The
most authoritative code, widely used to date as a handbook, is the
Shulhan 'Arukh..."
He then cites the teaching of this code regarding homicide:
"According to the Jewish religion, the murder of a Jew is a capital
offense and one of the three most heinous sins (the other two being
idolatry and adultery). Jewish religious courts and secular authorities
are commanded to punish, even beyond the limits of the ordinary
administration of justice, anyone guilty of murdering a Jew ... When the
victim is a Gentile, the position is quite different. A Jew who murders
a Gentile is guilty only of a sin against the laws of Heaven, not
punishable by a court. To cause indirectly the death of a Gentile is no
sin at all.
"Thus, one of the two most important commentators on the Shulhan 'Arukh
explains that when it comes to a Gentile, "one must not lift one's hand
to harm him, but one may harm him indirectly, for instance by removing a
ladder after he had fallen into a crevice ... there is no prohibition
here, because it was not done directly." ...
"A Gentile murderer who happens to be under Jewish jurisdiction must be
executed whether the victim was Jewish or not. However, if the victim
was Gentile and the murderer converts to Judaism, he is not punished."
Then Shahak gives us a rabbi's answer to an Israeli soldier who has asked
whether or not it is proper to kill Arab women and children. In his answer
the rabbi quotes from the Talmud: "The best of the Gentiles -- kill him; the
best of snakes -- dash out its brains."
Perhaps even more offensive are the Jewish beliefs on sexual matters. Shahak
writes:
"Sexual intercourse between a married Jewish woman and any man other
than her husband is a capital offense for both parties, and one of the
three most heinous sins. The status of Gentile women is very different.
The Halakhah presumes all Gentiles to be utterly promiscuous and the
verse "whose flesh is as the flesh of asses, and whose issue [of semen]
is like the issue of horses" is applied to them... Therefore, the
concept of adultery does not apply to intercourse between a Jewish man
and a Gentile woman; rather the Talmud equates such intercourse to the
sin of bestiality...
"According to the Talmudic Encyclopedia: "He who has carnal knowledge of
the wife of a Gentile is not liable to the death penalty, for it is
written: 'thy fellow's wife' rather than the alien's wife ... and
although a married Gentile woman is forbidden to the Gentiles, in any
case a Jew is exempted."
"This does not imply that sexual intercourse between a Jewish man and a
Gentile woman is permitted -- quite the contrary. But the main
punishment is inflicted on the Gentile woman; she must be executed, even
if she was raped by the Jew: "If a Jew has coitus with a Gentile woman,
whether she be a child of three or an adult, whether married or
unmarried, and even if he is a minor aged only nine years and one day --
because he had willful coitus with her she must be killed, as is the
case with a beast, because through her a Jew got into trouble.""
The Talmud's overriding concern with matters of money and property mirror
that of the Jews, and Professor Shahak offers a number of hair-splitting
examples of Jewish beliefs on the subject and the way in which distinctions
are made between the property of Jews and Gentiles, and between Jewish
dealings with another Jew and with a Gentile. Two of these examples will
suffice here:
"If a Jew finds property whose probable owner is Jewish, the finder is
strictly enjoined to make a positive effort to return his find by
advertising it publicly. In contrast, the Talmud and all the early
rabbinical authorities not only allow a Jewish finder to appropriate an
article lost by a Gentile, but actually forbid him or her to return
it...
"It is forbidden to defraud a Jew by selling or buying at an
unreasonable price. However, "Fraud does not apply to Gentiles, for it
is written: 'Do not defraud each man his brother'...""
Shahak points out that "the Halakhah interprets all such idioms [as 'each man
his brother' or 'neighbor'] as referring exclusively to one's fellow Jew."
How have the Jews managed to keep teachings of this sort concealed from the
Gentiles among whom they live? The truth of the matter is that they have not
always been able to do so. Luther was not the only Christian scholar who
learned Hebrew, peered into the Talmud, and was horrified by what he saw.
Sometimes the Jews were able to bribe the Christian authorities to overlook
such things, but throughout the later Middle Ages there were prohibitions and
burnings of talmudic literature by outraged popes and bishops. The Jews
developed a clever system of double bookkeeping to circumvent such
"persecution". They modified or deleted the offending passages from new
editions of the Talmud, and they made up a separate compendium -- Talmudic
Omissions, or in Hebrew Hesronot Shas -- which circulated surreptitiously
among the rabbis. In Israel today, feeling cocky enough to dispense with most
such deceptions, the Jews are putting the passages which formerly had been
omitted or modified back into the latest editions of the Talmud or the
Shulhan 'Arukh in their original form. They are still careful with
translations into Gentile tongues, however. Professor Shahak gives an
example:
"In 1962 a part of the Maimonidean Code ... the so-called Book of
Knowledge, which contains the most basic rules of Jewish faith and
practice, was published in Jerusalem in a bilingual edition, with the
English translation facing the Hebrew text. The latter has been restored
to its original purity, and the command to exterminate Jewish infidels
appears in it in full: "It is a duty to exterminate them with one's own
hands." In the English translation this is somewhat softened to: "It is
a duty to take active measures to destroy them." But then the Hebrew
text goes on to specify the prime examples of "infidels"who must be
exterminated: "Such as Jesus of Nazareth and his pupils, and Tzadoqand
Baitos [the founders of the Sadducean sect] and their pupils, may the
name of the wicked rot." Not one word of this appears in the English
text on the facing page (78a). And, even more significant, in spite of
the wide circulation of this book among scholars in the English-speaking
countries, not one of them has, as far as I know, protested against this
glaring deception."
Israel Shahak is a rare Jew indeed, and his book is essential reading for
anyone interested in the problem of the Jews.
A JEWISH PLOT against Radio Islam
By cunning and any other means Israel constantly tries to divert
attention from the Jewish occupation of Palestine and from the
dominance exerted by Jewish power over the western states. A group
of militant Zionists at Stockholm University have thus "revealed" -
in an opinion poll financed by Jewish organizations in Sweden - that
34 % of Swedish junior high school students doubt that the Holocaust
has really taken place.
The result of the poll, which has been made a great feature of in
Jewish-controlled media, caused panic in ruling circles. In the Swedish
parliament immediate measures were demanded from the government, and in an
emotionally tinged pronouncement the prime minister G�ran Persson expressed
his indignation and worry about the fact that only 66 % of the junior high
school students acknowledged the existence of the Holocaust.
Since one of the more important goals of the educational system and the media
is to make people believe in the story of the Holocaust and to achieve the
one hundred percentage of believers demanded by the Jewish power, G�ran
Persson has promised to take quick steps to intensify the brainwashing of the
junior high school students and citizens in general, and to shut the mouth of
everybody, who spreads doubt about the reality of the Holocaust. The Swedish
prime minister has also promised to distribute a video cassette about the
Holocaust to the parents of all junior high school students, so that the
former take their responsibility to educate their children in a Zionist
spirit.
It should be no secret that the speeches of the Swedish prime minister are
usually written by the strong man of the government, the Jew Leif Pagrotsky!
G�ran Persson's statement before the parliament struck the note for the
media. The day after the meeting of the parliament the pro-Zionist Swedish
newspaper Dagen wrote that "The Association of survivors fr�m the Holocaust"
has decided to stop Radio Islam and erect a big monument in memory of the
Holocaust in front of the synagogue in Stockholm. In an interview in the same
number of the newspaper the leader of the association, Jakob Ringart,
declared it to be "a scandal that Ahmed Rami is allowed to continue denying
the Holocaust in radio broadcasts on Swedish soil."
In an interview the same day in Swedish radio and TV one of the leaders of
the Jewish lobby declared that the result of the poll was the fruit of
broadcasts for years from Radio Islam, and that only Ahmed Rami can be happy
about it today. Exactly a week after the pronouncement of the prime minister
the Swedish attorney general decided to initiate legal proceedings against
Radio Islam's home page on Internet. To the media it was given to understand
that the whole dossier about this "affair" was to be classified as secret.
Since this legal action has been completely covered up and the attorney
general refuses to give a statement, the Swedish television turned to a
professor of law at Stockholm University. In his opinion "Ahmed Rami may be
found guilty of disrespect for the Jewish people, even if his home page on
Interbet is based in America.. As a Swedish citizen he is to be judged
according to Swedish law."
The day after the decision to initiate legal proceedings against Radio
Islam's home page on Internet Ahmed Rami received a bill concerning the
broadcastings from Radio Islam, which sends 35 hours a week in various
languages (among other things information from the persecuted Canadian
history revisionist Ernst Z�ndel). According to the bill, Radio Islam is
requested to pay 6000 Swedish crowns for the costs of the broadcasting at a
tariff of 65 crowns for a quarter of an hour (there is a common sender for
all the stations).
Radio Islam began sending on the 3rd of March 1987 and has never before been
requested to pay for the transmissions except for the use of a telephone line
connecting the studio with the sender! The chairman of the board of directors
of this sender is an active member of a Zionist organization, and the signer
of the bill (also a Zionist) is a member of a gay organization, which in its
publications has repeatedly attacked Radio Islam.
These legal and financial persecutions of Radio Islam and its home page on
Internet are not only directed against the person Ahmed Rami, who has already
served a sentence of six months in jail for the expression of his views, but
against the freedom of us all. Yesterday it was Z�ndel, today it is Rami. Who
will be the next tomorrow?
It is high time to pass to concrete acts of solidarity across the
geographical, ideological and religious boundaries. The powers of evil are
acting on a global level in a total war to lay our planet under Jewish
dominion. After showing their real face in Palestine they constantly advance
their positions for the purpose of turning the whole world into a single
large prison, guarded by a Jewish oligarchy!
Our civilization can only survive in a climate of freedom of thought and
respect for fundamental human rights. All religions, ideologies and political
systems should not deny an opposition the right to exist. The totalitarian
Zionism of today is the only ideology that systematically wants to make the
very existence of an opposition a criminal offence! Before we can coexist, we
must first be able to exist. That right is denied those who are opposed to
the Jewish domination. This fanaticism and obscurantism is a serious threat
against our civilization and against world peace. Each one of us should do
something concrete to defend freedom!
.
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance�not soapboxing! These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
