-Caveat Lector-
Isn't Cinton supposed to be the grandson of a Rockafella??
Peter
We are about to go on a Journey. All Aboard
http://sites.netscape.net/gsussnzl/poleshift
----- Original Message -----
From: Das GOAT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, December 12, 1999 11:25 PM
Subject: [CTRL] Pedigree of King George [Bush]
> -Caveat Lector-
>
> "George Bush has 7 known descents from King Edward I of England."
>
>
> from soc.genealogy.medieval newsgroup:
>
> Subject: Re: Governor George Walker Bush - Next President?
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Stewart Baldwin)
> Date: Sat, 11 December 1999 12:33 AM EST
> Message-id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> On 10 Dec 1999 18:51:52 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Ravilious)
> wrote:
>
> >Friday, Dec. 10, 1999
> >
> >
> >A Year 2000 Question for The Group:
> >
> > I recall an article (not well written) from ca. 1993 concerning
> >U.S. presidential elections and royal descent. The writer, citing an
> >interview from a representative (?) of Burke's, or another royal descent
> >purveyor, stated that (1) all U. S. Presidents have had at least one
> >royal ancestor, (2) their opponents in the general election have had
> >also, and (3) that whichever candidate had _the most royal descent_ was
> >the eventual winner of the election.
> >
> > Now, I have seen pedigrees posted hither and yon showing royal
> >descents for several (but not all) U.S. Presidents. With regard to the
> >upcoming election, assuming the Burke's Corollary to Murphy's Law has
> >and will continue to hold, it might be worthwhile if we could determine
> >who of the current field has _the most royal descent_ [a definition of
> >this term would be helpful, I suppose, but for a dyed-in-the-purple-wool
> >Burkist this might take all the fun out of it]. We could then arrange
> >for a rapid coronation, and the other candidates could then go back to
> >their other endeavours [or possibly seek to arrange more productive
> >pedigrees].
> >
> > By way of starting the process, I recall that George H. W. Bush
> >has 7 known descents from Edward I of England [if Barbara B. adds to the
> >total, this will up the ante somewhat]. Does any one have information
> >as to any of the other candidates?
> >
> > The eyes of Texas are upon you.
> >
> >
> > John
> >
>
> That story has been discussed before on this group, and there is not
> the slightest bit of truth to it. To give one example, Bill Clinton
> has no known royal descents, yet he beat George Bush, who has several.
> Also, there have been a few occasions where the same two men ran
> against each other in more than one election, with different winners
> (most notably Grover Cleveland and Benjamin Harrison).
>
> Stewart Baldwin
>
> DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
> ==========
> CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting
propagandic
> screeds are not allowed. Substance-not soapboxing! These are sordid
matters
> and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and
outright
> frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor
effects
> spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
> gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to
readers;
> be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
> nazi's need not apply.
>
> Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
> ========================================================================
> Archives Available at:
> http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
>
> http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
> ========================================================================
> To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
> SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
> SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Om
>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance�not soapboxing! These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
