Kathleen makes a good point. Also, McCain doesn't seem to know how to
listen. He just kept ranting and raving about those non-issues that he wanted to
force down everyone's throat. Flashback, perhaps?
-A
------ Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2000 09:20
AM
Subject: Re: [CTRL] Fw: Reagan / McCain
Exchange
How was McCain rude to
Reagan?
Can you specify
this?
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2000 12:09
AM
Subject: [CTRL] Fw: Reagan / McCain
Exchange
-Caveat Lector- <A
HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"> </A> -Cui Bono?-
Fascinating
how someone who's claimed to be the "Reagan Republican" can be so darn
rude with Ronald Reagan's son. Go figure!
-A ----- Original
Message ----- > > TRANSCRIPT > McCain on Michael Reagan
Show > Date: 2/29/2000 > > Michael Reagan: ...This is an
interview I tried to do earlier today with > John McCain...It would be
choosing the judges. If John McCain becomes > President of the United
States and will they be liberal judges, or will > they be conservative
judges. That's an issue many people would like to get > an answer to.
Is Warren Rudman going to be the Attorney General? That would > be
a good question to ask. Why don't we go now, Sen. John McCain.
Senator, > how are you? > > Sen. McCain: How are
you? > > Michael Reagan: I am just fine, thank you very much.
Where are you, are you > in Fresno? > > Sen. McCain:
I'm on the bus, I'm on the way to Bakersfield, I'm headed > through a
lot of very beautiful fruit tree areas. It's very pretty here in > the
valley. > > Michael Reagan: Question I want to ask you, first of
all, have you decided > now to get into the debate that's going to be
taking place on Thursday night? > > Sen. McCain: We're having
the debate will be by satellite from, we'll have > to stop on our trip
back to New York and we had to cancel some, some ah of > our New York
schedule, but we'll be there by satellite. > > Michael Reagan:
All right, let me ask you this, because I think it's an > issue, just,
isn't being played out within the campaign there's so many > other
things that are being talked about, but as President of the United >
States one of the legacy's you would leave would be the judges that
you > would appoint as President of the United States of America and
there's some > great concern if Warren Rudman, who is your overall
campaign chair, would > be in such a position in a McCain
administration to appoint judges like > Judge Souter to the bench as
was done during the Bush administration back > in the
1980's. > > Sen. McCain: Ah, Warren Rudman did not appoint Judge
Souter, President Bush > did, remember he was the
President. > > Michael Reagan: Yes, but... > > Sen.
McCain: Second of all, Warren Rudman is a fine, decent man who
served > his country in the Korean War, Attorney General of his state,
and a Senator > who was highly respected. It was, It was President
Bush that appointed > Justice Souter. > > Michael Reagan:
Right, but Warren Rudman... > > Sen. McCain: Warren Rudman is
seventy...let me finish, please, could I > finish? Ja ah, ah, Warren
Rudman is 70 years old, he's been, he had a > serious illness. He's
not interested in playing any active role in a McCain >
administration and I resent enormously phone calls that were made by
Pat > Robertson saying that he was a vicious bigot. I think that one
might be > Michael Reagan: Senator, Senator, Senator, Senator,
Senator, McCain Talking > Over Michael Reagan: well worth talking
about as well...Senator, I'm not, > Senator > > Sen.
McCain: I asked you, Michael, if I could finish, can I
finish? > > Michael Reagan: But you did finish [McCain
Interrupt] > > Sen. McCain: Can I finish? Can I finish? Yes or
no? > > Michael Reagan: What else do you have to
say? > > Sen. McCain: Can I finish, or not, I mean
otherwise > > Michael Reagan: Go ahead > > Sen.
McCain: OK. I don't appreciate him being called a vicious bigot
by Pat > Robertson in personal phone calls to hundreds of thousands
of Americans. He > is a fine and decent man and he will play an
advisory role to me because he > is a fine and decent man who
enjoyed a sterling reputation as United States > Senator and
Attorney General of the State of New Hampshire. > > Michael
Reagan: So, > > Sen. McCain: Now I'm finished. > >
Michael Reagan: Very good. And what I was trying to get to is the
fact > that, yes, Warren Rudman did not appoint him, Warren Rudman's
the man who > sold to John Sununu who sold him to President Bush at
the time, and what > (McCain Interrupt: In other words.) I want to
find out. > > Sen. McCain: In other words, in other words, in
other words President Bush > and John Sununu did not have any minds of
their own. That's, I don't think > that's the way it
happened. > > Michael Reagan: That's - Senator let me ask you
this. There are, there are.. > > Sen. McCain: I don't believe
that's how it happened. > > Michael Reagan: Well > >
Sen. McCain: John Sununu knew Souter just as well as Warren Rudman
did, > they're both from New Hampshire. > > (Reagan
talking over ) Michael Reagan: The question is, the question is, >
what kind of judges would you appoint to the bench? Would they by
Souter > like? Would they be judges in the make of a Bork, a Thomas?
What kind of > judges could we see from a President
McCain? > > Sen. McCain: My record is very clear as to who I
have supported and my > record is very clear in public statements that
Justice Scalia is a Justice > that I admire very much. I also happen
to admire Justice Rehnquist, Chief > Justice Rehnquist, who is from
the state of Arizona. And, ah, but Scalia I > admire an enormous
amount as well as others. My record as a conservative is > very
clear, my record on supporting people who adhere to the Constitution >
is very clear and my record as a, eighteen-year record, of
conservative > positions both physically and others is also very
clear. > > Michael Reagan: All right. Next question,
education.-big issue. I mean > compared to other industrial nations we
here in America, the children > routinely test near the bottom. So
what about your plan for an > better-educated child here in America?
What is the McCain plan? > > Sen. McCain: Choice, ah, by the
way, before we go into that, ah, are you - > it doesn't disturb you
that Pat Robertson would call up people and say > that, that ah Warren
Rudman is a vicious bigot? I'd like you to talk about > that a little
bit. > > Michael Reagan: No, Senator. No Senator, No Senator
because let me tell > you, I think that gets off > > Sen.
McCain: No, let me tell you, let me tell you when the man's name is >
maligned and his reputation is maligned then it ought to be talked
about, > OK? (inaudible) > > Michael Reagan: Senator
McCain, goodbye. > > [REAGAN HANGS UP ON MCCAIN] > >
Michael Reagan: Senator McCain, goodbye. (PAUSE) You know something
I'm > ripping this up. You lost my vote.
<A
HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A> DECLARATION &
DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational
exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are not allowed.
Substance-not soap-boxing! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy
theory'-with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright frauds-is
used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread
throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL gives
no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to
readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust
denial and nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as
always, Caveat
Lector. ======================================================================== Archives
Available at: http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ ======================================================================== To
subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE
CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To
UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF
CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
|