From-http://www.calweb.com/~welsh/brn-stdy.htm
Nonconsensual Brainwave and Personality
Studies by the U.S. Government
I am a survivor of ongoing mind control experimentation by the U.S.
government since 1989. I would like to prevent victims from experiencing much
of the pain that I went through by telling my testimony within the framework
of background information and history on government weapon testing programs,
especially radiation experimentation. I would state the same testimony under
oath in a Congressional hearing or in a court case. I first learned of
microwave harassment and mind control experimentation from Julianne McKinney,
director of the now inactive Electronic Surveillance Project. This is an
overview and does not include the unsavory details as the point is to
recognize the general pattern of experimentation. It will greatly help your
understanding of this paper if the preceding Research Possibilities list of
reputable newspaper and magazine articles on behavior control weapons is read
first.
I would challenge the reader to recognize the "plutonium vitamin pill" of
mind control technology before the U.S. government admits to it's use. This
paper is attempting to describe something that the reader is not familiar
with. This is critical to keep in mind so that this paper will communicate on
the basis of accepted reality.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION AND HISTORY
OF GOVERNMENT EXPERIMENTATION
The Congressional Record states that the U.S. government had been involved in
mind control experimentation from the 1950s up to the early 1970s.1 These
illegal behavior control experiments are similar to the documented illegal
radiation experiments. The U.S. government currently denies that there is
ongoing classified behavior control experimentation. This is debatable and in
my opinion will some day be as undeniable as the radiation experiments are
today.
There were at least 23,000 radiation victims of institutionalized unethical
experimentation.2 There are similarities between radiation and mind control
experimentation because the government bureaucracy is the same, the groups of
victims are the same and it involves weapon testing. But unlike the atomic
bomb, the U.S. public is not aware of the highly classified behavior control
weapons. This fact contributes to the difficulty that victims have in
exposing the experimentation.
The purpose of U.S. government research with electromagnetic frequencies and
computer-brain interface technology is to develop mind control weapons that
meet or surpass the enemy's mind control weapon program, in particular
Russia. The U.S. military's interest in controlling behavior and in using
this on it's enemies in future warfare is well documented.3 The lethal doses
and parameters of radiation were explored and now the limits of
computer-brain interface and emf technology are explored in the same
unethical way. And by using unwitting victims, experiments are conducted
without limits of human subject experimentation committees.
There are strong indications that electromagnetic frequency (emf) behavior
control weapons and electronic warfare has been a classified area of research
since at least the 1960s4, that there are highly classified international
agreements to control it's use, that it is being tested on unwitting human
subjects and that there is an active government program to cover up the whole
situation. Recently, there have been several articles published on nonlethal
weapons, emf weapons, and mind control in the U.S.5
And in the last five years there have been several articles in mainstream
publications about the Russian mind control technology and emf.6 And several
reliable sources confirm that the cover up involves government policy such as
the CIA refusing to release this information to the Radiation Advisory
Committee. Glenn Krawczyk wrote in Nexus, Vo1. 2, No. 22, Oct-Nov 1994, that
the CIA used a trick of terminology to disguise the development of microwave
weapons in the 1977 Congressional hearings on CIA behavior control programs
and has done the same thing with the Radiation Advisory Committee in 1994.
Another example: two top scientists in emf research have discussed government
harassment. Dr. Puharich, well-known for emf and previous government work,
described that his house was burned down and he was shot at for discussing
emf technology and it's development.7 Dr. Becker, the author of Body Electric
on emf, also lost government funding and discussed other examples of
harassment by the U.S. government.8
"The Soft-Kill Fallacy" by Steve Aftergood and Barbara Hatch Rosenberg in The
Bulletin of Atomic Scientist, Sept/Oct 1994 p. 45 stated that discussions
under the Certain Conventional Weapons Convention on electromagnetic weapons,
including weapons that interfere with mental processes and modify behavior
and emotional response, may lead to protocols to control their use. The fact
that behavior control weapons are in the public eye officially could mean
that the government wants to use these weapons and may not be able to control
their use enough to keep the emf weapons a secret.
WHAT MIND CONTROL EXPERIMENTATION IS
It is probable that classified computer-brain interface research has had a
highly advanced technological leap similar to the pattern of the development
of the atomic bomb weapon program. Many documented articles support this
claim.9 It has been fifty years since the development of the atomic bomb and
there have been major advancements in science, satellite technology,
computers and information. In my case, mind control experimentation is the
use of military electromagnetic frequency technology on human subjects in
order to develop baseline studies of the brain, including brainwave studies
and the study of personalities. As in radiation experiments, the lethal doses
and the limits of the technology are explored and the experiments are
inhumane. Mind control experiments are conducted as a result of development
of behavior control weapons and are, like the radiation experiments, examples
of science at it worst. Weapon testing programs are designed to disable and
kill the enemy and therefore the experiments are also designed to destroy.
There are over 500 documented cases of victims in the U.S., 1 million alleged
victims in Russia and cases in Germany, England, Canada, Finland, and South
America.10 A few of the main similarities between victims are as follows.
Women, prisoners and mental patients are a few of the powerless groups
targeted in U.S. government experimentation. Most of the victims describe
long term experimentation, some over 30 years. All ages, socioeconomic and
political groups are represented in mind control experiments.
This is a wide area of research and there are probably many umbrella projects
to test many different parameters of behavior control weapons. Government
experimentation with behavior control technology is based on psychological
principles of war. For example, multiple personalities are thought to be
caused by traumatic experiences. To determine how to control and destroy
people, the experiments are designed to reliably create multiple
personalities, (as in Project Monarch)11. Victim's testimony matches this
fact.
The U.S. government is using mental illness as a cover-up of mind control
experimentation. Many of the experiments are designed to mimic mental
illness. For example, the mental illness diagnosis manual for psychiatrists
states that the mentally ill patient put unusual meaning or interpretations
into normal objects. The experimenters can engineer visual and audio patterns
and change the amount and timing of any environment in a specific way to make
the victim see what a mentally ill person would see. In my case, I have
videotaped evidence of this effect. A report by a university statistics
professor confirmed an extremely high amount of red and white cars on two
separate occasions when compared with normal car color populations.12
With no meaningful evaluation, mental illness is the given explanation for
the million plus victims. The concurrent development of technology, the U.S.
government's history of involvement in mind control experiments and their
motive to research this area can also strongly support the fact that these
are victims of government experimentation. Further investigation of this
situation is necessary rather than dismissing it as mental illness.
RADIATION AND MIND CONTROL VICTIMS:
THE SAME DILEMMA
I and most survivors have not able to obtain help. This is typical in
government cover up situations. And because of the nature of the technology
itself, any efforts to stop the experimentation can be sabotaged with the
mind control technology itself. I have gone to the police, lawyers, private
investigators, newspapers, magazines, organizations such as the ACLU,
government agencies such as the U.S. Attorney General, Congressman Glenn,
Kennedy, Feinstein, Sharp and more. The answers vary from "you are crazy";
"you have to know the source of the experiment and have monitoring equipment
evidence"; "we don't handle cases such as this, it is out of our area of
expertise"; to no reply, or "we are aware of the situation but it will take
years and over $100,000 to pursue in court," and many other ways of saying
no.
Victims also cannot get around the unavailability of necessary government
documents classified under the National Security Act. There is documented
evidence that the superpowers have developed mind control weapons and that
the use of these weapons are classified and controlled by the National
Security Act. In the meantime, the government system is failing the mind
control victim in the same way that it failed the radiation victim. I use
what tools that I have, such as research of open literature and networking, a
painfully slow process.
At this point, none of the victims, singly or as a group have the funds to
stop the experimentation. I do not have the funds to rent or buy signal
analyzers to document signals that the government would surely cover up or
jam. Some victims have documented some unusual signals, but it is such a
small piece of evidence and is not directly tied to the government source.
The evidence has been ignored or discounted. I am currently organizing a
group of victims to be monitored by experts. Another group is also
organizing.
Victims work with their meager resources against a formidable foe. There is
only one successful court case of mind control experimentation against the
government and it was settled of court. There was small compensation to a few
of the victims.13 Until I can document in other more scientific ways, I am
documenting with videotapes and comparing them with normal tapes or accepted
statistics. Then it is evident that certain patterns in the environment are
unusual in timing and amount and statistically relevant and this is another
small piece of the mind control picture.
Experts are necessary to verify information for court cases and Congressional
hearings. Videotape evidence and other mind control experimentation evidence
does not directly tie the U.S. government to my allegation and therefore is
not accepted by courts, congressional hearings, or UN complaints. There are
many other basic and also complicated reasons for the government system and
its failure to help victims in any significant way. The system obviously
needs to be changed.
By combining relevant facts with the testimony of victims, the conclusion
about mind control experimentation is becoming clearer. I am networking with
close to 75 victims. Based on my experience, several victim's testimony, and
literature on mind control topics, it is logical to deduce that I am one of
many hundreds of victims. Fortunately, documentation of behavior control
weapons is increasing and the documentation matches previous and current
testimonies of victims. But, so far it is too little, too late. This is the
harsh reality of the situation.
This is a lengthy description, but certain issues must be emphasized in order
to survive normal skepticism that occurs when documented facts are missing.
Why for example, did radiation experiments occur after the Nuremburg trials
and why is mind control experimentation occurring in 1995? Reasons include;
that evil such as the Auschwitz experiments did not end with the Nuremburg
trials; that the National Security Act increased the odds that radiation
experiments could occur; and in 1995, there is no meaningful deterrent for
the actions of radiation and mind control "scientists".
REMEDIES AND SOLUTIONS
Government experimentation is illegal and is an abuse of U.S. constitutional
rights. One solution would be funding that would match the U.S. government's
resources. Or it will take someone such as Hazel O'Leary of the Department of
Energy who called for an investigation of radiation experimentation14, to
start an investigation of the mind control experiments.
Another possibility may be an accident in which the technology is exposed. Or
time will pass, such as ten to twenty years, after which the technology will
become public knowledge. Then there will be enough victims who come forward
and protest. It would be an indication of man's humanity if the mind control
scenario could be changed.
For further information and networking, I can be reached at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Comments are appreciated.
ENDNOTES
More Information Upon Request from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1. Alexander M. Capron, Human Experimentation, (University Publications of
America, 1986), 247.
Exerpt: "Apparently, it was not unusual for such research to begin with
volunteers and then move on to naive subjects. For example, in 1953 the CIA
began a series of highly sensitive experiments into the use of biological and
chemical agents to alter human behavior, under the general code name,
MK-ULTRA. The areas explored included radiation, electroshock, paramilitary
devices and materials, anthropology, graphology, psychiatry, psychology, and
sociology."
Also: Andrew Weil, Acid Dreams: the C.I.A., L.S.D. and the Sixties Rebellion,
by M. Lee and B. Shlain Book reviews, Nation, 8 Nov. 1986. p 492.
Excerpt: "Lee and Shlain sifted through mountains of heavily censored reports
to piece together the early history of L.S.D.... Meanwhile the U.S. Army
toyed with the idea of driving whole populations insane with hallucinogenic
drugs. By the mid-1960s nearly 1,500 military personnel had taken L.S.D. in
tests run by the Army Chemical Corps."
2. "Radiation Test Involved At Least 23,000," Seattle Times, Oct.22, 1994,
p.A1.
3. Lt.Col David J. Dean USAF, Low-Intensity Conflict and Modern Technology
with a forward by Congressman Newt Gingrich, (Air University Press, Center
for Aerospace Doctrine Research and Education, Maxwell AFB June, 1986)
Exerpt: THE ELECTROMAGNETIC SPECTRUM IN LOW-INTENSITY CONFLICT
By Capt Paul E. Tyler,MC,USAF
POTENTIAL MILITARY APPLICATIONS OF EMR
The exploitation of this technology for military uses is still in its infancy
and only recently has been recognized by the United States as a feasible
option. A 1982 Air Force review of biotechnology had this to say: Currently
available data allow the projection that specially generated radio frequency
radiation (RFR) fields may pose powerful and revolutionary antipersonnel
military threats. Electroshock therapy indicates the ability of induced
electric current to completely interrupt mental functioning for short periods
of time, to obtain cognition for longer periods and to restructure emotional
response over prolonged intervals. Experience with electroshock therapy, RFR
experiments and the increasing understanding of the brain as an electrically
mediated organ suggested the serious probability that impressed
electromagnetic fields can be disruptive to purposeful behavior and may be
capable of directing and or interrogating such behavior. Further, the passage
of approximately 100 milliamperes through the myocardium can lead to cardiac
standstill and death, again pointing to a speed-of-light weapons effect. A
rapidly scanning RFR system could provide an effective stun or kill
capability over a large area. System effectiveness will be a function of wave
form, field intensity, pulse widths, repetition frequency, and carrier
frequency. The system can be developed using tissue and whole animal
experimental studies, coupled with mechanisms and waveform effects research.
Using relatively low-level RFR, it may be possible to sensitize large
military groups to extremely dispersed amounts of biological or chemical
agents to which the unirradiated population would be immune.(1)
4. Joint Hearings before the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence and the
Subcommittee on Health and Scientific Research of the Senate Committee on
Human Resources, Project MK-ULTRA, The CIA's Program of Research in
Behavioral Modification, 95th Cong., 1st Sess. 75 (1977)
Also, Paul Brodeur, The Zapping of America, Toronto edition George J.
MacLeod, 1977. Explains the Russian Microwaves on the Moscow U.S. Embassy.
Also, Declassified CIA document, Pulsed Microwave Used for Mind
Control...1974.
5. Newsweek, Science of War nonlethal weapons. 7 Feb, 1994.
Also, Daily News, Nonlethal Weapon, 3 Aug, 1994.
Also, SPIE REPORTS New Technologies Provide Tools For Law Enforcement
Challenges Conference, chair William H. Webster, 9-94.
6. Refer to eight articles under Research Possibilities, this paper,
#1,3,5,6,8,9,10,11.
7. Dr. A. Puharich, Electromagnetic Conference, Sept. 1987, New York,
audiocassette.
Excerpt: "About ten years ago in 1976, no I'm sorry early 1977 I made the
basic measurements which showed the elf nature of elf coming from Russia and
that it was psychoactive, that was my finding and I deduced the chemicals
that were released by the frequencies that were being used and I passed that
information onto every intelligence agency we have in this country from the
president on down and England and Canada and all I got was four years of
harassment. My house was burned down, I was shot at, they tried to kill me,
they tried to eliminate me, etc., etc., and finally they agreed I was right
and in 1981, the U.S. government went into full scale elf warfare and set up
all their big transmitters down under in Australia and Africa so on and so on
and now their in business and everything's classified and you can't say a god
damned thing about it, a tough situation. And you can't get any real
information out of any government agency. And I know all of them that do the
work. I know the people who head the projects etc. When they're in trouble,
they usually come ask me. And they classify what I tell them. Insanity."
8. Robert O. Becker,MD and Gary Selden, The Body Electric: Electromagnetism
and the Foundation of Life. Wm Morrow & Company, NY 1985.
9. Dr. Karl H. Pribram,(Stanford Professor, famous for holograghic theory of
the brain),editor, Rethinking Neural Networks: Quantum Fields and Biological
Data, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers, 1993. p.156-7.
Excerpt: " B. Multiple Personality....Now suppose that the diabolical
training is 'extensive', both figuratively and literally. that is, suppose
that it succeeds in placing other avoidance patterns into a geometry that
surrounds and isolates a large cognitive domain from the rest of the neural
network. Subsequently, wavepackets that form in that domain will be trapped
there, and that domain will then develop a personality that is distinct from
the personality of the exterior domain(s). But the entrapment is not
permanent: Quantum tunneling provides a mechanism for penetration of the
barrier, after which another distinct personality emerge."
Also, Fox Butterfield, The New York Times, $2.15 million for hidden-weapon
research, Seattle Post-Intelligencer, Friday, March 10, 1995, A3.
Excerpt: "...for the development of new high-technology gun detectors that
would permit the police to spot people carrying concealed guns on the street
or inside stores. "The camera works because the body naturally emits strong
electromagnetic signals in the millimeter wavelength, said Dr.Richard
Huguenin, the inventor of the device at Millitech Corp."
Also, C.C.Morton, Brain trust, New Recruits, UC Davis Magazine, Spring 1994,
p.21.
Excerpt: " In the lab of psychology professor Ron Mangun, UC Davis students
serve as research subjects for a technique known as electrophysiology, in
which 64 electrodes dotted on a cloth cap record electrical impulses from the
surface of the head. The impulses are thought to correspond to cognitive
processes inside the brain. The subjects sit in a sound booth. While one
computer system flashes images, another computer system records the brain's
responses 400 times a second.11
Also, The Guardian, The Future Art of War, 25, May 1995, p. 9.
Excerpt: "Nick Lewer, peace researcher at the University of Bradford, looks
in the latest issue of Medicine and War,..." "There are plans for 'mind
control' with the use of 'psycho-correction messages' transmitted by
subliminal audio and visual stimuli. There is also a plan for 'psychotronic
weapons' - apparently the projection of consciousness to other locations -
and another to use holographic projection to disseminate propaganda and
misinformation."
Also, The Houston Chronicle, Brainpower, 16, Feb. 1995.
Excerpt: "'Brain-actuated control' is under development at the Dayton, Ohio,
base to help pilots deal with the increasing amount of information needed to
fly modern jets, said Grant McMillan, director of Patterson's biocybernetics
lab. Eventually, pilots may be able to control flight using only their minds,
he added. With biofeedback, in which changes in the brain are portrayed on
screens, volunteers learn how to control the electrical activity created by
their thought processes. Scalp monitors pick up the electrical signals, and a
computer translates them into mechanical commands."
10. Association of National Security Alumni, Electronic Surveillance Project
Julianne McKinney, Director. Not in existence at present. Over 100 victims in
1993.
International Committee For the Convention Against Offensive Microwave
Weapons P.O. Box 58700 Philadelphia, PA 19102-8700. Tel: (215) 893-9505.
Harlan Girard, Director. Over 500 victims in 1995.
Freedom of Thought Foundation, P.O. Box 35072 Tucson, AZ 85740 Walter Bowart,
Founder. Over 150 survivors in 1995.
Mediacco, Director, Robert Naeslund P.O. Box 136, 11479 Stockholm, Sweden.
Implant victims and mind control.
Canadian Stone Angels, Director, Lynne Moss sharman 369 Pearl St. Apt 2,
Thunder Bay, Ontario, P7B 1A9, Masonic/military/medical/mind control victims.
Ecology And Living Environment, A Russian environmental and civil liberties
group, Moscow, 500 members. Set up an association of "Victims of Psychotronic
Experimentation, President, Emilia Cherkova," No address. From: Owen
Matthews," Report: Soviets Used Top Secret 'Psychotronic' Weapons," The
Moscow Times, 11, Jul., 1995, Section No 750.
11. Walter Bowart, Operation Mind Control. Flatland Editions 1978, 1994.
12. Letter from Jessica Utts, Professor of Statistics University of
California, Davis October 18, 1995 to Cheryl Welsh.
Excerpt: "...For whatever reason the color distributions at the two locations
do not appear to be statistically equivalent. In other words, if the cars at
both locations were considered to be randomly sampled from the same
population of cars, discrepancies in color as extreme as those you have
observed, or more so, would only occur with probability 0.0004. Most
statisticians would conclude, based on this number, that the populations from
which the two sets of cars were sampled were different in terms of color
distribution. ..."
13. Refer to Research Possibilities,this paper, #5.
14. Stephen Budiansky, Erica E. Good & Ted Gest," U.S. News Investigative
Report" U.S. News & World Report, 24, Jan. 1994, p. 34. " Orlikow v. U.S.,
filed in 1979, was settled in 1988 for $750,000." It was settled out of court
and split among the several defendents.
15. Melissa Healy, Los Angeles Times," Energy chief says U.S. owes radiation
victims," The Sacramento Bee final 29 Dec. 1993. p A1.
Excerpt: "Under O'Leary, the department has vowed to 'come clean' on the
secrets of nuclear testing. Her department and a special panel of doctors,
lawyers and department aides she has named are investigating dozens and
possibly hundreds of government-sponsored experiments in which humans were
subjected to radiation."
<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please! These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths,
misdirections
and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with major and
minor
effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
<A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
<A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
