5/28/00
The myth of American democracy is crumbling as never before. This is a good
thing. Maybe something positive will come of it.
The conservative Right, those " Patriots " who brought us Viet Nam and other
Imperialist adventures, have finally dropped the scales from their eyes.
This leaves only the so called " moderates " consisting of Liberals and
moderate conservatives supporting the status quo. The likes of Bill Clinton,
Al Gore, and Europe's " Third Way-ers." A status quo which if left
to it's own devices, unobstructed, will almost certainly destroy the quality
of life for almost all the earth's current and near future inhabitants.
But hey, that's ok. As long as Liberals and moderates are comfortable and
making a few bucks within the very economic system killing millions in other
parts of the world... what the hell. Just don't say nigger, kike, spic, or
wog in front of them because they are really very moral people who would be
outraged by such a demonstration of indecency. It requires so little of them
to keep that false image.
Joshua2
=================================================================
> WJPBR Email News List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> A vote for Bush or Gore is a vote to continue Clinton policies!
> A vote for Buchanan is a vote to continue America!
> Therefore a vote for Gore or Bush is a wasted vote for America!
> Don't waste your vote! Vote for Patrick Buchanan!
>
> Dear Brigade,
>
> "As he often has in his turbulent presidency - on issues such as NAFTA
> and welfare reform - Clinton built his winning coalition on the backs of the
> Republicans who love to loathe him...."
>
> With PNTR Clinton has succeeded in ringing the final GOP death knell.
> The presidential race is now between Gore and Buchanan.
>
> I thank God Pat is not a Republican!
>
> GO PAT GO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
> Linda
> ----------------------
>
> The different Democrat does it again,
> aided by those who impeached him
>
> by Michael Tackett 5/25/00 - Chicago Tribune
>
> WASHINGTON - The lawmakers who helped President Clinton pass the
> China trade bill were the same ones who have rhetorically scalded him
> on the House floor, investigated him with subpoenas and cast votes to
> remove him from office.
>
> His opposition came from House leaders of his own party.
Because there are Congress people who simply owe their positions to unions
or isolationist constituencies. They simply had to vote against China, or
lose reelection. No one in this position is punished. Survival is the name
of the game.
>
> As he often has in his turbulent presidency - on issues such as NAFTA
> and welfare reform - Clinton built his winning coalition on the backs of the
> Republicans who love to loathe him.
>
> "This is unprecedented," said Marshall Wittman, a congressional analyst
> at the Heritage Foundation. "In previous administrations, the examples
> are non-existent where a president relied primarily on the other party to
> pass a major legislative item."
This is a lie. All major pieces of legislation and foreign policy since the
turn of the LAST century ( 1900 ) has required members of both parties ( working
for their Rich and corporate sponsors,) to pass.
>
> The president who came to Washington vowing to be a different kind of
> Democrat has changed his stripes in ways not even he could have
> envisioned.
>
> To be sure, his dexterity was borne of necessity after Democrats lost
> their congressional majority in 1994. But with Clinton, results are often
> not a matter of ideology or principle.
>
> They are a matter of simply getting to "yes."
>
> He will leave many marks on the American presidency; a clear one will
> be an ability to build unusual coalitions to achieve his priorities. If
> history
> judges him in part for his success in broadening the U.S. role in world
> trade, he will have his fiercest opponents to thank.
Wrong again. It was not Clinton who put together these seemingly unusual
coalitions, but more a case of politicians understanding their obligations
to the people who paid for their campaigns.
This is after all... THEIR JOB.
> "Political agility, he's got a lot of that, probably more than any president
> since Franklin Roosevelt," said Bert Rockman, a professor of political
> science at the University of Pittsburgh and co-author of the recently
> published "Clinton Legacy."
>
> A unique ability
>
> Lyndon Johnson, whose skills were honed as Senate majority leader,
> was known for his masterly horse-trading. But he dealt mostly with
> factions within his own party or disparate regional interests. And his own
> party ruled Congress.
>
> Ronald Reagan and many other presidents have had to reach across the
> aisle on specific issues. George Bush relied on Democrats to pass his ill-
> fated budget plan that included tax increases, which permanently
> wounded him in his own party.
>
> But Clinton has somehow been able to give his own party a black eye
> one day, only to extend his hand in friendship the next.
>
> Most of the same members of organized labor who led the public fight
> against the China trade deal, and House Democratic leader Dick
> Gep.hardt, who led the battle from within, will remain Clinton's friends in
> the fall campaign.
Because American Labor are elitist scum. Just like their corporate
counterparts. And also just like their corporate counterparts, their continuing
status as well plumped parasites depends ENTIRELY upon the continuation of
corporate capitalism.
> Clinton, in fact, will work to ensure organized labor turns out in huge
> numbers to try to return Democrats to the majority in the House, and to
> install Gephardt as speaker and Vice President Al Gore as president.
This is the glory of Duopoly. There is NO ONE representing the working people
of this country. NO ONE.
>
> "The larger part of his agenda is consistent with groups that oppose him
> on this issue," said Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill. "He has been good to the
> labor movement and working families, though they may disagree with
> him on this."
>
> "It also reflects what Clinton has meant to the Democratic Party," Durbin
> said. "Eight years ago, (the party) was branded as fiscally irresponsible,
> weak on crime and insensitive to welfare reform. He has redefined the
> Democratic Party. It is more mainstream and has shaken off a lot of the
> old cliches that used to haunt us. So from time to time, his conservative
> agenda splits with the traditional power sources of the Democratic
> Party."
>
> 1994 a turning point
>
> When he campaigned in 1992, Clinton sent a few distinct signals that he
> would not be cowed by his party's left wing, and he essentially has
> maintained that posture in office. But the disaster of his proposed health-
> care plan and the historic 1994 GOP congressional victories forced him
> into a corner most presidents haven't seen.
>
> Over time, his policies have effectively neutralized traditional Republican
> advantages on issues such as crime, taxes and fiscal responsibility. On
> trade, however, he has always sided more with the GOP.
>
> "I know as a fact that he changed his broad governing style after the
> 1994 elections, where he said that he felt the first couple of years he was
> acting as a prime minister and not a president," said one recently
> departed senior administration official. "He needed to strike a balance
> between getting votes but not getting so much into the thicket that he
> also lost his ability to lead.
>
> "This is a president who clearly is a better president now than he was
> two or three years ago. He learned about the most effective way of
> leading the country and governing the Hill regardless of who is in power."
>
> In his final year in office, he is said to be most interested in a legacy
> that
> begins with anything but the word impeachment. To that end, he will take
> his victories where he can and, given that Republicans don't speak his
> language on most domestic policy, Clinton's safe haven has been
> international affairs - the one area where he was thought to be most
> lacking when he took office.
It must be clearly understood that a President is almost irrelevant when it
comes to foreign policy. Foreign policy is run in the State Department, and
formulated in the CFR and other non governmental private elite planning groups.
To prove this point. I would ask the reader to pay close attention to the
persons being offered the Secretary of State position BY BOTH BUSH AND GORE.
All the nominees will be CFR members. The candidates won't even mind going
across party lines, but they won't go across CFR's lines.
>
> A warm embrace
>
> And as if to underscore how quickly Clinton will return to his party's
> warm embrace, the Democratic National Committee held a gala in
> downtown Washington last night.
>
> And when the issues turn to health care, education or guns, expect the
> GOP to return to bashing him.
Because they are hot button issues used to distract and divide the public
from the issues important to big internationalist business interests. They
also serve to DELINEATE the few differences between the Big Business Parties.
>
> "For Clinton, this is not personal, this is politics, and if he can score a
> victory with anyone's help, he will do it," said Wittman. "And forget about
> it the next day."
>
> --------------- end --------------
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> T H E I N T E R N E T B R I G A D E
> Linda Muller - WebMaster
> Post Office Box 650266, Potomac Falls, Virginia 20165
> Email: http://www.buchanan.org/form-contact.html
> Web: http://www.buchanan.org
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> S U P P O R T the Internet Brigade !
> Help by sending a Contribution to the address
> above or use our online forms at:
> http://www.buchanan.org/contributioncheck.html
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Have You O F F I C I A L L Y E N L I S T E D Yet?
> http://www.buchanan.org/form-enlistment.html
>
> Today, candor compels us to admit that our vaunted two-party system is a
> snare and a delusion, a fraud upon the nation. Our two parties have become
> nothing but two wings of the same bird of prey...
> Patrick Buchanan
<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths,
misdirections
and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and
minor
effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
<A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
<A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
