Date: Wed, 31 May 2000 17:13:04 -0700 (PDT)
From: Franklin Wayne Poley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [LIFE-GAZETTE] Wang's Wisdom: Faster than Light, 1/2

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Wed, 31 May 2000 19:24:02 -0400
From: Larry Klaes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: H. Alan Montgomery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
     "Also [EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [>Htech] Light Exceeds Its Own Speed Limit, or Does It?

Date: Wed, 31 May 2000 16:18:52 -0700
From: "Scott, Mark I" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: The speed of light may not necessarily be a hard speed limit!
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)

Light Exceeds Its Own Speed Limit, or Does It?

By JAMES GLANZ

The speed at which light travels through a vacuum, about 186,000 miles per
second, is enshrined in physics lore as a universal speed limit. Nothing can
travel faster than that speed, according freshman textbooks and conversation
at sophisticated wine bars; Einstein's theory of relativity would crumble,
theoretical physics would fall into disarray, if anything could.

Two new experiments have demonstrated how wrong that comfortable wisdom is.
Einstein's theory survives, physicists say, but the results of the
experiments are so mind-bending and weird that the easily unnerved are
advised--in all seriousness--not to read beyond this point.

In the most striking of the new experiments a pulse of light that enters a
transparent chamber filled with specially prepared cesium gas is pushed to
speeds of 300 times the normal speed of light. That is so fast that, under
these peculiar circumstances, the main part of the pulse exits the far side
of the chamber even before it enters at the near side.

It is as if someone looking through a window from home were to see a man
slip and fall on a patch of ice while crossing the street well before
witnesses on the sidewalk saw the mishap occur--a preview of the future. But
Einstein's theory, and at least a shred of common sense, seem to survive
because the effect could never be used to signal back in time to change the
past--avert the accident, in the example.

A paper on the experiment, by Lijun Wang of the NEC Research Institute in
Princeton, N.J., has been submitted to Nature and is currently undergoing
peer review. It is only the most spectacular example of work by a wide range
of researchers recently who have produced superluminal speeds of propagation
in various materials, in hopes of finding a chink in Einstein's armor and
using the effect in practical applications like speeding up electrical
circuits.

"It looks like a beautiful experiment," said Raymond Chiao, a professor of
physics at the University of California in Berkeley, who, like a number of
physicists in the close-knit community of optics research, is knowledgeable
about Dr. Wang's work.

Dr. Chiao, whose own research laid some of the groundwork for the
experiment, added that "there's been a lot of controversy" over whether the
finding means that actual information--like the news of an impending
accident--could be sent faster than c, the velocity of light. But he said
that he and most other physicists agreed that it could not.

Though declining to provide details of his paper because it is under review,
Dr. Wang said: "Our light pulses can indeed be made to travel faster than c.
This is a special property of light itself, which is different from a
familiar object like a brick," since light is a wave with no mass. A brick
could not travel so fast without creating truly big problems for physics,
not to mention humanity as a whole.

A paper on the second new experiment, by Daniela Mugnai, Anedio Ranfagni and
Rocco Ruggeri of the Italian National Research Council, described what
appeared to be slightly faster-than-c propagation of microwaves through
ordinary air, and was published in the May 22 issue of Physical Review
Letters.

The kind of chamber in Dr. Wang's experiment is normally used to amplify
waves of laser light, not speed them up, said Aephraim M. Steinberg, a
physicist at the University of Toronto. In the usual arrangement, one beam
of light is shone on the chamber, exciting the cesium atoms, and then a
second beam passing thorugh the chamber soaks up some of that energy and
gets amplified when it passes through them.

But the amplification occurs only if the second beam is tuned to a certain
precise wavelength, Dr. Steinberg said. By cleverly choosing a slightly
different wavelength, Dr. Wang induced the cesium to speed up a light pulse
without distorting it in any way. "If you look at the total pulse that comes
out, it doesn't actually get amplified," Dr. Steinberg said.

There is a further twist in the experiment, since only a particularly
strange type of wave can propagate through the cesium. Waves Light signals,
consisting of packets of waves, actually have two important speeds: the
speed of the individual peaks and troughs of the light waves themselves, and
the speed of the pulse or packet into which they are bunched. A pulse may
contain billions or trillions of tiny peaks and troughs. In air the two
speeds are the same, but in the excited cesium they are not only different,
but the pulses and the waves of which they are composed can travel in
opposite directions, like a pocket of congestion on a highway, which can
propagate back from a toll booth as rush hour begins, even as all the cars
are still moving forward.

These so-called backward modes are not new in themselves, having been
routinely measured in other media like plasmas, or ionized gases. But in the
cesium experiment, the outcome is particularly strange because backward
light waves can, in effect, borrow energy from the excited cesium atoms
before giving it back a short time later. The overall result is an outgoing
wave exactly the same in shape and intensity as the incoming wave; the
outgoing wave just leaves early, before the peak of the incoming wave even
arrives.

As most physicists interpret the experiment, it is a low-intensity precursor
(sometimes called a tail, even when it comes first) of the incoming wave
that clues the cesium chamber to the imminent arrival of a pulse. In a
process whose details are poorly understood, but whose effect in Dr. Wang's
experiment is striking, the cesium chamber reconstructs the entire pulse
solely from information contained in the shape and size of the tail, and
spits the pulse out early.

If the side of the chamber facing the incoming wave is called the near side,
and the other the far side, the sequence of events is something like the
following. The incoming wave, its tail extending ahead of it, approaches the
chamber. Before the incoming wave's peak gets to the near side of the
chamber, a complete pulse is emitted from the far side, along with a
backward wave inside the chamber that moves from the far to the near side.

The backward wave, traveling at 300 times c, arrives at the near side of the
chamber just in time to meet the incoming wave. The peaks of one wave
overlap the troughs of the other, so they cancel each other out and nothing
remains. What has really happened is that the incoming wave has "paid back"
the cesium atoms that lent energy on the other side of the chamber.

Someone who looked only at the beginning and end of the experiment would see
only a pulse of light that somehow jumped forward in time by moving faster
than c.

"The effect is really quite dramatic," Dr. Steinberg said. "For a first
demonstration, I think this is beautiful."

In Dr. Wang's experiment, the outgoing pulse had already traveled about 60
feet from the chamber before the incoming pulse had reached the chamber's
near side. That distance corresponds to 60 billionths of a second of light
travel time. But it really wouldn't allow anyone to send information faster
than c, said Peter W. Milonni, a physicist at Los Alamos National
Laboratory. While the peak of the pulse does get pushed forward by that
amount, an early "nose" or faint precursor of the pulse has probably given a
hint to the cesium of the pulse to come.

"The information is already there in the leading edge of the pulse," Dr.
Milonni said. "You can get the impression of sending information
superluminally even though you're not sending information."

The cesium chamberhas reconstructed the entire pulse shape, using only the
shape of the precursor. So for most physicists, no fundamental principles
have been smashed in the new work.

Not all physicists agree that the question has been settled, though. "This
problem is still open," said Dr. Ranfagni of the Italian group, which used
an ingenious set of reflecting optics to create microwave pulses that seemed
to travel as much as 25% faster than c over short distances.

At least one physicist, Dr. Guenter Nimtz [[umlaut over u]] of the
University of Cologne, holds the opinion that a number of experiments,
including those of the Italian group, have in fact sent information
superluminally. But not even Dr. Nimtz believes that this trick would allow
one to reach back in time. He says, in essence, that the time it takes to
read any incoming information would fritter away any temporal advantage,
making it impossible to signal back and change events in the past.

However those debates end, however, Dr. Steinberg said that techniques
closely related to Dr. Wang's might someday be used to speed up signals that
normally get slowed down by passing through all sorts of ordinary materials
in circuits. A miniaturized version of Dr. Wang's setup "is exactly the kind
of system you'd want for that application, Dr. Steinberg said.

Sadly for those who would like to see a computer chip without a speed limit,
the trick would help the signals travel closer to the speed of light, but
not beyond it, he said.




------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tired of searching?
Get the right answer, fast, from someone who's been there - guaranteed.
http://click.egroups.com/1/4520/9/_/618879/_/959815411/
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Post message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
List owner:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
List home:    http://www.onelist.com/community/transhumantech
Alt archive:  http://excelsior.planetx.com/transhumantech/
Old archive:  http://excelsior.planetx.com/transhumantech/threads.html



------------------------------------------------------------------------
Get 2 FREE books at eHarlequin.com.Indulge in our romantic books,
recipes and getaway ideas. Take your romantic escape today to
http://click.egroups.com/1/4778/2/_/564407/_/959818386/
------------------------------------------------------------------------

What would a complete society be like if it were to "do all for the glory of God"? (I 
Corinthians 10:31). What would Canada be like if it were a "Godly Society" functioning 
in this manner?

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths,
misdirections
and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and
minor
effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
<A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to