This response is targeted at John Knight!
Who wrote: 
Why is our own government at war with fatherhood?
 
John Knight
 
John, I'm surprised at your ignorance.  Don't you know that 'Fatherhood' is essential to rearing a disciplined, noble Family?
The Father contains all the factors of goodness inherent in our Creator and instills into the Soul of his offspring the ability
to know right from wrong.  If the Mother is also of noble character, then the chances are very good that their offspring will be able to live a Life unfettered by the stench of our Society.
Fatherhood is the last barrier to the pinkos, feminists, homosexual takeover of our Society.
One CANNOT be FREE while being governed by the likes of those  godless creatures.
John, You must give what I say some serious thought so you don't succumb to the leftist propaganda.
I have good vibes that your upper organ will let in the Light of Truth.
Bard
PS:  It is NOT possible for two practicing homosexuals or two practicing lesbians to rear a child maturing into an entity containing a noble character;  the Light of Truth will have been extinguished and its search for redemption and Love will be unfulfilled.  I am so grateful that I have the means in which to convey to others the hopelessness of pursing Life without a rekindled faith in our Creator.
 
 -----Original Message-----
From: Fathers Manifesto [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2000 11:53 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; The Grip (E); [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Religionornotnow; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Holy War; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; ChristianPatriot; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Christian Nationalist
Subject: [ChristianPatriot] Re: [repeal19th] RE: US Senate renames Fathers Day!

Agreed, Stu,
 
It almost appears that they read one of NOW's screeds word for word.
 
So why shouldn't we do the same?  NOW should agree, right?  After all, they want "equality", don't they?
 
Why is our own government at war with fatherhood?
 
John Knight
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2000 9:59 AM
Subject: [repeal19th] RE: US Senate renames Fathers Day!

I am livid about this!

I propose a Mother's Day resolution that praises single fathers and bashes mothers for aborting children, divorcing their husbands to go "find themselves" or because they are "unfulfilled," and because 55% of the time a child is murdered it is by the mother and because almost all the time a child is abused or neglected it is by the mother.

-----Original Message-----
From: Fathers Manifesto [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2000 12:59 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; The Grip (E); [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Religionornotnow; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Holy War; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; ChristianPatriot; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Christian Nationalist
Subject: US Senate renames Fathers Day!

Dear Brad,
 
I sure wish Stu had commented on this, because this is an ambiguous message.  It is good news that the Senate is finally recognizing the statistics which we have been expounding for 5 years.  But it's sure a slap across the face to call single-mother sluts "heroes".  Do to that at the same time that they infer that the men from whom this Senate robs $1.8 trillion per year through federal taxation are responsible for "between 20 percent and 30 percent of families in poverty are headed by women who have suffered domestic violence during the past year and between 40 percent and 60 percent of women with children who receive welfare were abused at some time in their life" in unconscionable.
 
This, of course, is a big fat LIE, and we know that they know it is a LIE, and they know that we know that they know it is a LIE.
 
The only reason we know it is a LIE is because of studies which they used our tax dollars to conduct.  If we know it is a LIE, then they know it's a LIE.
 
These folks are dead meat.  They are more worthless than tits on a boar.  These perverts have conducted this anti-fatherhood campaign for so long that they don't even know how to speak simple English.  They of course are not stupid--they are "merely" corrupt.
 
John Knight
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2000 6:19 PM
Subject: Re: [repeal19th] US Senate renames Fathers Day!

I say this deserves a concerted MARCH on Washington, and to show our support for this tripe.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2000 5:27 PM
Subject: [repeal19th] US Senate renames Fathers Day!

 
NATIONAL RESPONSIBLE FATHER'S DAY (Senate - June 13, 2000)

[Page: S5057]  GPO's PDF

Mr. ENZI. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the Senate proceed to the immediate consideration of S. Res. 322, introduced earlier today by Senators Bayh, Domenici, and others.

The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mr. Allard). The clerk will report the resolution by title.

The assistant legislative clerk read as follows:

A resolution (S. Res. 322) encouraging and promoting greater involvement of fathers in their children's lives and designating June 18, 2000, as `Responsible Father's Day.'

There being no objection, the Senate proceeded to consider the resolution.

Mr. ENZI. I ask unanimous consent the resolution be agreed to, the preamble be agreed to, a motion to consider be laid upon the table, and any statements be printed in the Record.

The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.

The resolution (S. Res. 322) was agreed to.

The preamble was agreed to.

The resolution, with its preamble, reads as follows:

S. Res. 322


Encouraging and promoting greater involvement of fathers in their children's lives and designating June 18, 2000, as `Responsible Father's Day'.

Whereas 40 percent of children who live in households without a father have not seen their father in at least 1 year and 50 percent of such children have never visited their father's home;

Whereas approximately 50 percent of all children born in the United States spend at least 1/2 of their childhood in a family without a father figure;

Whereas nearly 20 percent of children in grades 6 through 12 report that they have not had a meaningful conversation with even 1 parent in over a month;

Whereas 3 out of 4 adolescents report that `they do not have adults in their lives that model positive behaviors';

Whereas many of the United States leading experts on family and child development agree that it is in the best interest of both children and the United States to encourage more two-parent, father-involved families to form and endure;

Whereas it is important to promote responsible fatherhood and encourage loving and healthy relationships between parents and their children in order to increase the chance that children will have two caring parents to help them grow up healthy and secure and not to--

(1) denigrate the standing or parenting efforts of single mothers, whose efforts are heroic;

(2) lessen the protection of children from abusive parents;

(3) cause women to remain in or enter into abusive relationships; or

(4) compromise the health or safety of a custodial parent;

Whereas children who are apart from their biological father are, in comparison to other children--

(1) 5 times more likely to live in poverty; and

(2) more likely to--

(A) bring weapons and drugs into the classroom;

(B) commit crime;

(C) drop out of school;

(D) be abused;

(E) commit suicide;

(F) abuse alcohol or drugs; and

(G) become pregnant as teenagers;

Whereas the Federal Government spends billions of dollars to address these social ills and very little to address the causes of such social ills;

Whereas violent criminals are overwhelmingly males who grew up without fathers;

Whereas the number of children living with only a mother increased from just over 5,000,000 in 1960, to 17,000,000 in 1999, and between 1981 and 1991 the percentage of children living with only 1 parent increased from 19 percent to 25 percent;

Whereas between 20 percent and 30 percent of families in poverty are headed by women who have suffered domestic violence during the past year and between 40 percent and 60 percent of women with children who receive welfare were abused at some time in their life;

Whereas millions of single mothers in the United States are heroically struggling to raise their children in safe, loving environments;

Whereas responsible fatherhood should always recognize and promote values of nonviolence;

Whereas child support is an important means by which a parent can take financial responsibility for a child and emotional support is an important means by which a parent can take social responsibility for a child;

Whereas children learn by example, community programs that help mold young men into positive role models for their children need to be encouraged;

Whereas promoting responsible fatherhood is not meant to diminish the parenting efforts of single mothers but rather to increase the likelihood that children will have 2 caring parents to help them grow up in loving environments; and

Whereas Congress has begun to take notice of this issue with legislation introduced in both the House of Representatives and the Senate to address the epidemic of fatherlessness: Now, therefore, be it
Resolved, That the Senate--

(1) recognizes the need to encourage active involvement of fathers in the rearing and development of their children;

(2) recognizes that while there are millions of fathers who serve as a wonderful caring parent for their children, there are children on Father's Day who will have no one to celebrate with;

(3) urges fathers to participate in their children's lives both financially and emotionally;

(4) encourages fathers to devote time, energy, and resources to their children;

(5) urges fathers to understand the level of responsibility required when fathering a child and to fulfill that responsibility;

(6) is committed to assist absent fathers become more responsible and engaged in their children's lives;

(7) designates June 18, 2000, as `National Responsible Father's Day';

(8) calls upon fathers around the country to use the day to reconnect and rededicate themselves to their children's lives, to spend `National Responsible Father's Day' with their children, and to express their love and support for their children; and

(9) requests that the President issue a proclamation calling upon the people of the United States to observe `National Responsible Father's Day' with appropriate ceremonies and activities.


 
SENATE RESOLUTION 322--ENCOURAGING AND PROMOTING GREATER INVOLVEMENT OF FATHERS IN THEIR CHILDREN'S LIVES AND DESIGNATING JUNE 18, 2000, AS `RESPONSIBLE FATHER'S DAY' (Senate - June 13, 2000)

[Page: S5032]  GPO's PDF

Mr. BAYH (for himself, Mr. Domenici, Mr. Abraham, Mr. Akaka, Mr. Ashcroft, Mr. Bingaman, Mr. Bond, Mr. Breaux, Mr. Brownback, Mr. L. Chafee, Mr. Dodd, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Gorton, Mr. Graham, Mr. Gramm, Mr. Grams, Mr. Gregg, Mr. Inhofe, Mr. Johnson, Mr. Kerrey, Ms. Landrieu, Mr. Lieberman, Mr. Murkowski, Mr. Smith of New Hampshire, Mr. Stevens, Mr. Thurmond, and Mr. Voinovich) submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to:

S. Res. 322

Whereas 40 percent of children who live in households without a father have not seen their father in at least 1 year and 50 percent of such children have never visited their father's home;

Whereas approximately 50 percent of all children born in the United States spend at least 1/2 of their childhood in a family without a father figure;

Whereas nearly 20 percent of children in grades 6 through 12 report that they have not had a meaningful conversation with even 1 parent in over a month;

Whereas 3 out of 4 adolescents report that `they do not have adults in their lives that model positive behaviors';

Whereas many of the United States leading experts on family and child development agree that it is in the best interest of both children and the United States to encourage more two-parent, father-involved families to form and endure;

Whereas it is important to promote responsible fatherhood and encourage loving and healthy relationships between parents and their children in order to increase the chance that children will have two caring parents to help them grow up healthy and secure and not to--

(1) denigrate the standing or parenting efforts of single mothers, whose efforts are heroic;

(2) lessen the protection of children from abusive parents;

(3) cause women to remain in or enter into abusive relationships; or

(4) compromise the health or safety of a custodial parent;

Whereas children who are apart from their biological father are, in comparison to other children--

(1) 5 times more likely to live in poverty; and

(2) more likely to--

(A) bring weapons and drugs into the classroom;

(B) commit crime;

(C) drop out of school;

(D) be abused;

(E) commit suicide;

(F) abuse alcohol or drugs; and

(G) become pregnant as teenagers;

Whereas the Federal Government spends billions of dollars to address these social ills and very little to address the causes of such social ills;

Whereas violent criminals are overwhelmingly males who grew up without fathers;

Whereas the number of children living with only a mother increased from just over 5,000,000 in 1960, to 17,000,000 in 1999, and between 1981 and 1991 the percentage of children living with only 1 parent increased from 19 percent to 25 percent;

Whereas between 20 percent and 30 percent of families in poverty are headed by women who have suffered domestic violence during the past year and between 40 percent and 60 percent of women with children who receive welfare were abused at some time in their life;

Whereas millions of single mothers in the United States are heroically struggling to raise their children in safe, loving environments;

Whereas responsible fatherhood should always recognize and promote values of nonviolence;

Whereas child support is an important means by which a parent can take financial responsibility for a child and emotional support is an important means by which a parent can take social responsibility for a child;

Whereas children learn by example, community programs that help mold young men into positive role models for their children need to be encouraged;

Whereas promoting responsible fatherhood is not meant to diminish the parenting efforts of single mothers but rather to increase the likelihood that children will have 2 caring parents to help them grow up in loving environments; and

Whereas Congress has begun to take notice of this issue with legislation introduced in both the House of Representatives and the Senate to address the epidemic of fatherlessness: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved, That the Senate--

(1) recognizes the need to encourage active involvement of fathers in the rearing and development of their children;

(2) recognizes that while there are millions of fathers who serve as a wonderful caring parent for their children, there are children on Father's Day who will have no one to celebrate with;

(3) urges fathers to participate in their children's lives both financially and emotionally;

(4) encourages fathers to devote time, energy, and resources to their children;

(5) urges fathers to understand the level of responsibility required when fathering a child and to fulfill that responsibility;

(6) is committed to assist absent fathers become more responsible and engaged in their children's lives;

(7) designates June 18, 2000, as `National Responsible Father's Day';

(8) calls upon fathers around the country to use the day to reconnect and rededicate themselves to their children's lives, to spend `National Responsible Father's Day' with their children, and to express their love and support for their children; and

(9) requests that the President issue a proclamation calling upon the people of the United States to observe `National Responsible Father's Day' with appropriate ceremonies and activities.

[Page: S5033]  GPO's PDF







The government only has as much power as it's citizens give it.

Reply via email to