Crafting “Gay” Children
AN INQUIRY INTO THE ABUSE OF VULNERABLE CHILDREN
VIA ESTABLISHMENT MEDIA & THE SCHOOLROOM
Judith Reisman
Gay liberationists in general, and boy-lovers in particular, should know
Kinsey’s work and hold it dear…. implicit in Kinsey is the struggle we
fight today.
North American Man/Boy Love Association (NAMBLA) 1981
This paper will address three related issues. First, a brief comment on the
role of mainstream media in shaping public opinion by suppressing truth in
the service of special sexual interests. Second, the history of Alfred
Kinsey’s role in promoting the current advances in pedophilia and
homosexuality. And finally, the schoolroom initiation of children into sex,
especially “gay” sex, as feeding the “[t]ightly run organizations” that
traffic in roughly half-a million boy prostitutes.
Kinsey’s carefully planned publicity program was designed to create an
international mass media sensation which would appear to be spontaneous and
unanticipated.
Judith A. Reisman, Kinsey, Crimes & Consequences (1998)
Dr. Reisman’s study supports the conclusion that Alfred Kinsey’s research
was contrived, ideologically driven and misleading. Any judge, legislator
or other public official who gives credence to that research is guilty of
malpractice and dereliction of duty.
Charles E. Rice, Professor of Law, Notre Dame Law School, Indiana
Gay men view these boys as recreational toys to be used. I have heard many
stories of HIV positive men having unprotected sex with boys. They don't
think it matters.
Homosexual activist in The Advocate (March 1992).
PROJECT 10, named after Kinsey’s (1948) estimate that 10% of the population
is exclusively homosexual, originally envisioned as an in-school counseling
program…. has become a district-wide and nation-wide forum for the
articulation of the needs of lesbian, gay, and bisexual teenagers.
Virginia Uribe, Coming Out of the Classroom Closet (1991).
I. PAUSING TO ADDRESS HOMOSEXUALITY AND FREE SPEECH
In his famous June 1978 Harvard commencement address Aleksander Solzhenitsyn
indicted America’s mass media for the betrayal of its office:
The press can both stimulate public opinion and miseducate it…The press has
become the greatest power within the Western countries, more powerful than
the legislature, the executive, and judiciary. One would then like to ask:
By what law has it been elected and to whom is it responsible.
Based on its free speech privileges, the American press is charged with
providing a “window to the world” by which the polity may locate the source
of a social malaise, evaluate and correct it. But, if establishment
media--news and entertainment--broadcasts disinformation and conceals
adverse information about a matter or malaise, than the Fourth Estate (the
mass media) becomes an unelected fifth column directing law and public
policy. Especially now, when the New York Times reports that “the annual
budgets of gay and lesbian charities and social service agencies amounts to
about $100 million” these “charities” and “agencies” are in a position to
dramatically recraft the national psyche, and thereby national conduct.
This author seeks to break through the mass media conspiracy of silence.
Rogers’ “Theory of Diffusion of Innovation”: Philip Kotler’s classic work,
Marketing Management documents how controlled news is used to “both
stimulate public opinion and miseducate” it. Rogers and Kotler report that
in a media campaign, 2½% of our social leaders often sway roughly 13% of the
public early-on who later move another 34%, and so on until a majority
accept and adapt the proffered product or idea. This diffusion is visible
in the shift from the view of homosexuality as a result of early familial
and/or sexual trauma, Pre-Kinsey 1950s, to the Post-Kinsey view of
homosexuality as normal and children as “born gay.” The shift was sustained
by the Fourth Estate--turning a police raid on a boy prostitution hub (the
1969 Stonewall Riots) into a clarion call for freedom. And the diffusion is
seen in the magical transformation of AIDS from a fatal, infectious disease
caused largely by violent forms of aberrant promiscuity into a “homophobic”
attack on minority rights.
The on-going media campaign effect is visible in the eight-year shift from
youthful rejection to acceptance, even practice of homosexuality. A recent
“teen poll” conducted by the establishment media teen magazine Seventeen,
claimed that 17% of teens polled in 1991 versus 54% polled in 1999 accept
homosexuality as appropriate. Seventeen casually noted: “Teens today are
likely to experiment: 21%… have fantasized about fooling around with someone
of the same sex—and 15% say they have actually done so.”
As in Seventeen, at the same time that establishment media carelessly
announces juvenile homosexual experimentation, it suppresses data on the
culture of inter-gay violence—men battered and killed by pickups and
prostitutes--although these cases are often reported by the homosexual press
itself. Especially hidden by both homosexual and establishment media are
the data on homosexual violence against children and inter-gay “domestic”
battery, discussed in some detail in this monograph.
A recent example was the aggressive cry of “hate crimes” surrounding the
two heterosexual killers of an adult homosexual, Matthew Shepard, while
simultaneously covering up the barbaric murder of 13-year-old Jesse
Dirkhising (found “bound, gagged… repeatedly raped in a sado–masochistic
ritual”) by two trusted homosexual friends of the child’s mother.
Similar homosexual child sex murders or inter-gay violence is either briefly
noted or ignored by the Fourth Estate. The vicious 1997 rape/murder of
10-year-old Jeffrey Curley was unheard of until the $200 million law suit
filed in May 2000 against NAMBLA by the parents of the dead child, well
after the conviction of two homosexual “lovers” of the boys’ torture and
death. Yet knowledge of such violence is critical if parents and the
polity are to make informed choices about leaving their children with
homosexual acquaintances or authorities.
When “dirty linen” is hidden, public debate is uninformed and distorted.
Homosexual authors Island and Letellier attempt to expose inter-gay violence
in their book, Men Who Beat the Men Who Love Them, estimating that up to
“650,000 gay men” are annually battered, “a gay man is abused… every 90
seconds.” How many of these battered men die at the hands of other
homosexuals? Yet Island and Letellier find establishment media and the
homosexual media will not print the truth about inter-gay violence. Why?
It would be just plain bad press for gays and…all bad news needs to be
suppressed… [Add the authors] gay men truly…have a proportionate share of
violent individuals in their midst who bash other gay men [and boys] in
startlingly high numbers. The gay community needs to recognize that
wealthy, white educated, “politically correct” gay men batter their lovers.
Much of the Fourth Estate currently discriminates by employing only
bi/homosexuals to cover “sexual orientation” issues, further compromising
the public’s ability to obtain unbiased reports. In a rare “politically
incorrect” media event the popular television drama “ER” showcased
inter-gay male battery tolerably common in emergency wards--and as often
leading to domestic “homicides.”
As homosexual activists have shifted their lobbying efforts to schoolrooms
coast-to-coast, outraged parents, neighbor to neighbor, are reporting the
radical forms of “pedagogical eros” taught to schoolchildren over the
electronic fence of e-mail. In his book on boy prostitution For Money or
Love, liberal reporter Robin Lloyd, confirms the admission of Island and
Lettellier, says the press suppresses police reports of raids and arrests of
adults preying on young boys:
[The police raids] usually go unreported by the press. Both wire services,
the Associated Press and the United Press International, file the stories to
their clients (newspapers, radio stations, and television stations), but the
stories are always preceded with the cautionary “EDITORS” (NOTE NATURE OF
THE STORY).” Editors do…and often elect not to use them.
Gagnon Says Hide Gay Origins. Absent any biological evidence of
homosexuality, “lesbian, gay, and bisexual teenagers” exhibit classical
symptoms of childhood trauma (parental violence, alcoholism, sex abuse
and/or other dysfunctions). Concerned lest the public become aware of the
traumatic histories of most allegedly “gay” youth, National Research Council
advisor and Kinsey researcher, John Gagnon, told sex researchers to hide the
causes of homosexuality:
The wish of some gay men and lesbians to locate the origins for their
desires in …biology or early experience deserves a respectful response even
though I think it to be wrong… Attempts to placate the oppressors will only
invite further persecution. The source of freedom in everyday life for gay
men and lesbians is continued vigilance and practical political action.
Eager to conceal any causes rooted in bad parenting or early sex abuse which
suggest adult responsibility, even crime, Kinseyans, supported by the media,
formed groups like PROJECT 10, PFLAG, (Parents and Friends of Lesbians and
Gays) and later, GLBT, (Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual And Transgendered) youth.
Since historical, cross-cultural, literary and testimonial evidence clearly
identifies a homosexual etiology of family disorders, it is understandable
that many parents zealously insist their child was “born that way,” avoiding
the personal blame and public disgrace inherent in having placed their
offspring in harm’s way. But, how did 2?% of America’s leaders—largely
America’s intellectual community--adopt these radical new views on sex and
homosexuality?
II. PRE AND POST “KINSEY ERAS”
To answer that question we turn to Alfred C. Kinsey. In 1989 the
prestigious National Research Council proclaimed that sex science, “can be
divided somewhat crudely into the pre-Kinsey and post-Kinsey eras.” On
April 23, 2000 The New York Times Book Review celebrated the fact that
Indiana University had given America, “ the man whose studies started the
sex revolution.” And, on April 17, 2000, Salon’s Scott McLemee wrote:
Kinsey’s effect on society was profound and enduring. It did not rise and
fall with his bestseller status… [but became] the manifestoes of sexual
revolution and the counterculture…. The history of sex in America falls
into two large, unequal, yet clearly defined periods. The first era belonged
to the Puritans, the Victorians…This epoch of libidinal prohibition lasted
until Jan. 4, 1948. The following day, Professor Alfred C. Kinsey of Indiana
published Sexual Behavior in the Human Male. Whereupon, as the expression
has it, the earth moved.
True. Since 1948, Kinsey has continually fashioned the American libido. As
NAMBLA says, any who would understand the modern theater of “sexual
orientation” must “know Kinsey’s work” for implicit in it is the struggle
for pedophile control of America’s children.
Kinsey: The Media Myth. Many Americans born post WWII may not recall the
Kinsey team and their reports, Sexual Behavior in the Human Male (1948) and
Sexual Behavior in the Human Female (1953). A vast and meticulously
orchestrated media-relations campaign made Kinsey a household name, heralded
as a folk hero in over 70 percent of the nation’s press. Life, Look, Time
and every other major mainstream magazine promoted his bold sex “findings”
as heroic scientific truth.
Indiana University had set the stage by posing zoologist Kinsey as a
conservative Republican academic, a family man, who serendipitously stumbled
onto sex research only to discover (surprise!) that while Americans
pretended to be virtuous, virginal, monogamous and faithfully heterosexual,
they were really hypocritical, promiscuous, closeted bi/homosexual
adventurers.
The Reality: The Kinsey team, not America’s parents played false. Kinsey’s
most recent admiring biographers both confessed he was a sadistic
bi/homosexual who seduced his male students and coerced his wife, his staff
and their wives to perform for and with him in illegal pornographic films
made in the family attic.
Kinsey and his mates-- Wardell Pomeroy, Clyde Martin and Paul Gebhard--had
“front” marriages, which concealed their strategies to supplant what they
saw as a narrow procreational Judeo/Christian era with a promiscuous
“anything goes” bi/gay pedophile paradise. An early adherent and advocate
of masturbation, Kinsey suffered an untimely death due, at least in part, to
“orchitis,” a lethal infection in his testicles that followed years of
sadistic, orgiastic “self-abuse.” He didn’t go blind, but some say it did
kill him.
The Research Methodology: Kinsey’s closeted team 1) “forced” subjects to
give the desired answers to their sex questions, 2) secretly trashed ¾ of
their research data, and 3) based their claims about normal males on a
roughly 86% aberrant male population including 200 sexual psychopaths, 1,400
sex offenders and hundreds each of prisoners, male prostitutes and
promiscuous homosexuals. Moreover, so few normal women would talk to them
that the Kinsey team labeled women who lived over a year with a man
“married,” reclassifying data on prostitutes and other unconventional women
as “Susie Homemaker.”
The Children: Kinsey solicited and encouraged pedophiles--at home and
abroad--to sexually violate from 317 to 2,035 infants and children for his
alleged data on normal “child sexuality.” Many of the crimes against
children (oral and anal sodomy, genital intercourse and manual abuse)
committed for Kinsey’s data are quantified in his own graphs and charts.
For example, “Table 34” on page 181 of Kinsey’s Male volume, claims to be a
“scientific” record of “multiple orgasm in pre-adolescent males.” Here,
infants as young as 5 months are timed with a stop watch for “orgasm” by
Kinsey’s “technically trained” aides, with one 4-year-old, tested 24-hours
around the clock for an alleged 26 orgasms. These child “data” are
commonly quoted by sex educators, pedophiles and their advocates to prove
children’s need for homosexual, heterosexual, bisexual satisfaction via
“safe”-sex education.
The Conspiracy of Silence. How could a dry, scientific tome be hyped
globally to bestseller status and draw no questions from skeptical reporters
or scientists as to where children for human sexual experiments were
obtained when the nation was still reeling from Nuremberg? In his Male
volume, Kinsey defined children’s torment (“screaming,” “writhing in pain,”
“fainting,” “convulsions” etc.), as “orgasms” for infants too young to
speak. Who sexually tested these children?
Where were the parents? Among thousands of international reviews of the
Kinsey Reports, no one asked these questions of the man who--as Gore Vidal
declared--was “the most famous man for a decade,” and who, more
specifically for this writing, is the man the homosexual and pedophile
movement thank for their advance.
-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Pugliese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Monday, May 22, 2000 6:58 PM
Subject: [CTRL] homosexuals commit, 80 % of child molestations
One of these URL's has the religious right fanatics saying that
homosexuals commit, 80 % of child molestations. Give these haters another
lesson in bogus statistics, and they'll say 101% are committed by gays.
Michael Pugliese
http://www.google.com/search?q=Homosexuals+commit+child+molestations&num=10&;
meta=hl%3Den%26lr%3D&safe=off&btnG=Google+Search
....org/misc/bl057.pdf Gays commit 80% of child molestations...
...inherit the kingdom of God "homosexuals are included in a list of...
www.wiredstrategies.com/frc.html
<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing
propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths,
misdirections
and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and
minor
effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to
readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
<A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
<A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
<A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
<A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
