http://la.indymedia.org/display.php3?article_id=614

THE AMERICAN CRIMINALIZATION OF POVERTY
by ch@nce 9:51pm Fri Aug 11 '00
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

"Homeless" laws specifically target homeless individuals and their activities. 
"Status" laws punish people for their economic condition, rather than behavior.

THE AMERICAN CRIMINALIZATION OF POVERTY
by Dave Oehl

What do you get when you cross a booming national economy with homeless people? Less 
homeless people, right?

Wrong.

What you get, apparently, is not only greater homelessness, but also enactment and 
greater enforcement of laws and policies that criminalize poverty or homelessness. 
Efforts in many cities are now focused on excluding the homeless from downtown areas 
and places where they congregate. It is important to examine public policy as a means 
of social control instead of social change or improvement. To this end, this article 
will provide and discuss some examples of anti-poor policies, and solutions being 
proposed or utilized.

Anti-poor and homeless policies

Laws

According to the Atlanta Task Force for the Homeless (ATFH) Criminalization of Poverty 
report, published in 1993, there are two kinds of laws that discriminate against the 
poor and homeless. "Homeless" laws specifically target homeless individuals and their 
activities. "Status" laws punish people for their economic condition, rather than 
behavior.

Many cities across the country have homeless laws, but they generally fall into the 
general categories. Panhandling is restricted or banned altogether; Massachusetts 
passed a law of this kind several years ago but it was struck down by the state courts 
as unconstitutional. A lawsuit in Los Angeles is challenging its anti-panhandling law. 
Anti-camping ordinances prohibit sleeping on streets or in parks at all or after 
curfew, such as in Austin, Texas. Many cities have no-standing zones where people may 
not linger, or no-sitting areas. Austin and Los Angeles have laws such as these. There 
also exist such arcane laws as the prohibition of public parking lot crossing, in 
Atlanta.

In the Arizona city of Tucson, a special zone was created in which it is a crime to 
simply be homeless. Police were arresting homeless people without cause and releasing 
them only when they agreed to stay out of the area for a certain period of time. Alan 
Mason, arrested under this law, was banned from an area that covered just about all of 
downtown, including his lawyer, all the courthouses, the voter registration office, 
and places of worship.

The line between homeless laws and status laws blurs. Most disorderly conduct laws are 
considered status laws by the ATFH, since many homeless are mentally ill, or 
predisposed to erratic behavior, caused by, or the cause of, their homelessness. 
Criminal trespassing, public urination, and public drinking are also considered status 
ordinances.

An example of a recent status ordinance is an ordinance proposed, not passed, in 
September by Ray Suarez of the Chicago City Council to prohibit sleeping in cars. Mr. 
Suarez said that some residents did not feel safe because people were sleeping in cars 
near their homes. Why do they not feel safe? Activists are now making sure that 
Councilor Suarez is educated on this issue and is dealing constructively with it and 
discussing affordable housing.

Other Policies

Many administrations choose to selectively enforce laws to punish homeless people, 
laws that were not originally meant to do so. The laws involved vary from stolen 
property to general trespassing to general sanitation (laws that prohibit dumping in 
vacant lots or blocking entrances or alleys)

New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani is creatively sculpting NYC laws to punish the homeless 
and clear the streets, and making up new policies as he goes along.

Giuliani has ordered massive street sweeps to clear out New York's homeless people 
since a tourist was seriously injured when attacked by an allegedly homeless man last 
November. One commentator remarked that this is the first time punishment has been 
meted out before there is even a suspect. If you won't work, you'll be kicked out of a 
shelter, and then you'll be arrested for sleeping on the street. The Mayor is also 
opposed to any minimum wage increases that might help the poor pay for housing. 
Meanwhile he is promoting New York as an urban Disneyland; as a result, rents are 
going up, and the city and state are not creating affordable housing. After a while, 
one begins to suspect his motives.

A New York City police manual for carrying out street sweeps called "Quality of Life 
enforcement Options: A Police Reference Guide" lists 35 offenses for which one can be 
arrested. A homeless man challenging these policies in court was arrested in 1997 on 
an obscure sanitation code violation. He was strip-searched and held for 27 hours; the 
ticket turned out to be invalid.

In Los Angeles, Downtown business improvement districts hired private security forces 
to patrol the streets. They have been charged in a lawsuit with coercive detention, 
invasion of privacy, and assault and battery. These security officers routinely 
interview people on the street and keep files on the people they interview. They 
photograph and search the belongings of people they think don't belong. This policy 
does nothing to address these people's needs or the causes of their situation.

The effects of criminalization

One of my friends described the worst feeling in the world as "when someone doesn't 
want you anymore." These policies increase the alienation and what Michael Sullivan 
from Bread and Jams calls "paranoia." It is frightening to live knowing that by virtue 
of who you are, or at least what condition you find yourself in, you could be 
arrested. The man who started the suit against New York City now avoids contact with 
service workers, fearful of being arrested again. He never sleeps in the same place 
twice. Homeless people are less likely to seek help and shelter if they think they may 
get harassed or arrested. This can lead to more deaths or destructive behavior.

Homeless artist and writer Robert Lederman says that these policies may cause more 
homeless to be shot by police while resisting arrest or acting "suspiciously," not 
only hurting people but also inviting lawsuits.

These policies make it difficult for poor and homeless people to find and hold jobs. 
Employers are reluctant to hire poor and homeless people when they have a criminal 
record. Furthermore, if people are arrested for "quality of life" violations and miss 
work, they may lose their jobs.

The costs of litigation, police activity, and jailing homeless people can be 
substantial. The Atlanta Task Force for the Homeless suggested that jailing, for three 
days, half of the 9000 homeless people arrested in 1995 would cost 742,500 dollars. 
That doesn't include court and administrative costs.

These policies also feed negative public opinion, distracting it away from positive, 
long-term solutions and focusing it on the people themselves, not their condition.

Challenges to this Discrimination

Challenges to these policies are coming in several forms. Many court cases have been 
won or are pending, as noted above. Then there are activist groups and democratic 
government action.

The National Law Center on Homelessness and Poverty is an organization that documents 
legal abuses and aids homeless defendants and plaintiffs. They provide legal advise 
and often file Friend of the Court briefs on behalf of plaintiffs. They have supported 
many homeless people in successful lawsuits.

For example, in 1997, a settlement agreement was arrived at in the Pottinger v. City 
of Miami (FL), whereby the city agreed to implement a training program to ensure that 
homeless people's rights are not violated. The police may not destroy the property of 
homeless people. An advisory committee was created to monitor police contact with 
homeless people, and monetary compensation was provided to the plaintiffs. This case 
was a "landmark development" and is provisions are being reviewed for possible use all 
over the country.

The National Coalition for the Homeless is a nationwide advocacy organization with 
programs and resources. They are currently conducting a National Homeless Civil Rights 
Organizing Project. The purpose is to link grassroots organizations in a national 
network in order to "fortify those local efforts and to strengthen cooperation. This 
project helps individuals or groups in resource poor locales to organize an immediate 
response by providing knowledge, experience and resources. The NCH recognizes that to 
avoid simply returning to the old status quo, the campaign must work both to protect 
civil rights and to stop the causes of homelessness once the discrimination stops.

A third method of countering this discrimination is as a quasi-governmental body, such 
as the Multi-disciplinary Working Group (MWG) convened to address issues of 
Homelessness, Public Intoxication, and Nuisance Behaviors in Cambridge MA. Rather than 
enforce nuisance ordinances in Cambridge, the MWG was formed. It is composed of a 
range of individuals, including homeless or formerly homeless people, police officers, 
various public service agencies, and city government agencies. The MWG focused on how 
to help "problem" homeless people, those who used the city's services the most. The 
MWG's report states that their task "was to formulate recommendations for responding 
to the public nuisance behaviors of these individuals." The MWG discussed ways to 
streamline service provision and cut down on redundancy, fill in gaps in services, how 
to improve relations between the housed and homeless populations, and community 
involvement.

This is a constructive, educational and cooperative method for the solution of the 
problem.

Social control is at work here. The vast majority of these policies are lauded by 
businesses who, as one might expect, are only concerned with profit margins. These 
policies are enacted by elected representatives responding to constituents or to 
campaign contributors. However, there is a significant effort to organize in 
opposition of this control. Most larger American cities have organizations of homeless 
and poor people; some are stronger than others. All can be brought together to combat 
discrimination.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

*******************************************************
HOMELESS PEOPLE'S NETWORK <http://aspin.asu.edu/hpn>
7,000+ POSTS by or via homeless & ex-homeless people.
Nothing About Us Without Us - Democratize Public Policy
*******************************************************




*** NOTICE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is 
distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving 
the included information for research and educational purposes. Feel free to 
distribute widely but PLEASE acknowledge the source. ***
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The end is in the means as the tree is in the seed.
- Mahatma Ghandi
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Abraham Lincoln, letter to Wm. F. Elkins  Nov. 21 1864
Arthur Shaw ed.  The Lincoln Encyclopedia  40  {1950}

"We may congratulate ourselves that this cruel war is nearing
it's end.  It has cost a vast amount of treasure and
blood.........It has indeed been a trying hour for the
Republic, but I see in the near future a crisis approaching
that unnerves me and causes me to tremble for the safety
of my country.  As a result of the war, corporations have been
enthroned and an era of corruption in high places will
follow, and the money power of the country will endeavor to
prolong it's reign by working on the prejudices of the
people until all wealth is aggregated in a few hands and the
Republic is destroyed.  I feel at this moment more anxiety
for the safety of my country than ever before, even in the
midst of war."
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
http://216.167.120.50/cia-ath-pt1.htm
http://cryptome.org/RIPAct.htm
http://www.bytesforall.org
http://www.infoshop.org/hood.html
http://www.slip.net/~knabb/sitemap.htm
http://members.aol.com/cre9ive/
http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit/links.html
http://www.anat.org.au/resistant-media/

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to