from: from:alt.conspiracy As, always, Caveat Lector Om K ----- Click Here: <A HREF="aol://5863:126/alt.conspiracy:639544">Prescott Bush/Nazis -- Actual Doc.</A> ----- Subject: Prescott Bush/Nazis -- Actual Doc. From: "Ted K." <A HREF="mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]">[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A > Date: Fri, Sep 1, 2000 1:58 AM Message-id: <8onr12$1oi2$[EMAIL PROTECTED]> This web-site includes actual scans of the Vesting Orders in 1942 that mandated the seizure of Union Banking, of which Prescott Bush was a director and a shareholder, along with Harriman et al.. This was under the Trading with the Enemy Act, for their financing of Nazis. This order also states UB's partnership with the Thyssen Family, the notorious Nazi financiers. <A HREF="http://www.bushcheney2000.org/VestingExplain.htm#10">http://www.bushc heney2000.org/VestingExplain.htm#10</A> ===== from: http://www.bushcheney2000.org/VestingExplain.htm#10 Click Here: <A HREF="http://www.bushcheney2000.org/VestingExplain.htm#10">Rami fications of Vesting Order 248</A> ----- Inside External links The author's case against Prescott Bush Home Why the author says that Prescott Bush committed treason The author of this web page states that Prescott Bush, grandfather of Gov. George W. Bush, was a traitor working on behalf of the Nazis when this country was at war with Germany during World War II. The proof comes in the form of four arguments: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Argument #1: The Secret War Against the Jews (John Loftus and Mark Aarons, 1994, St. Martin's Griffin). Pages 357 - 361 Loftus and Aarons spell out how Herbert "Bert" Walker and his son-in-law, Prescott Bush, worked on behalf of the Nazis after the US had gone to war against Germany. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Argument #2: Webster G. Tarpley and Anton Chaitkin's George Bush: the Unauthorized Biography (http://www.tarpley.net/bushb.htm) Chapter II - The Hitler Project Tarpley and Chaitkin cite many documents confirming the thesis. Specifically, they use Vesting Order 248 (1942) as evidence that the US Government considered the Union Banking Corporation as working on behalf of the enemy (Germany). Tarpley and Chaitkin also footnote documents confirming that Prescott Bush was the director of the Union Banking Corporation. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Argument #3 The author has obtained a copy of the summary for Vesting Order 248 from the Federal Register, in Washington DC. Where: The Federal Register Washington, DC Web: http://www.nara.gov/fedreg/ Metro stop: Union Station Cost: 10 cents a copy ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Vesting Order 248: The summary for Vesting Order 248 is very brief. The author recommends that interested parties read the first few paragraphs. The summary reads: ALL OF THE CAPITAL STOCK OF UNION BANKING CORPORATION AND CERTAIN INDEBTEDNESS OWING BY IT Under the authority of the Trading with the enemy Act, as amended, and Executive Order No. 9095, as amended, and pursuant to law, the undersigned, after investigation, finding: (a) That the property described as follows: All of the capital stock of Union Banking Corporation, a New York corporation, New York, New York, which is a business enterprise within the United States, consisting of 4,000 shares of $100 par value common capital stock, the names of the registered owners of which, and the number of shares owned by them respectively, are as follows... One of the stockholders listed is Prescott S. Bush. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Argument #4 >From the local library the author has made a photocopy of an entry in a reference book from September, 1942 (a month before Vesting Order 248 was issued) showing that Prescott Bush was a director of the Union Banking Corp. (Source: Polk's Bankers Encyclopedia, 96th edition, Section 1, Sept. 1942, R.L. Polk & Co., Publishers) Author's question: If Ralph Nader's family had obtained great wealth from a grandfather's work on behalf of the Nazis would the media remain quiet about it? The media's silence on the subject of what Loftus-Aarons and Tarpley-Chaitkin have written regarding the Bush family dynasty speaks volumes about the mainstream media's commitment to protect the general public from tyranny and oppression. ----- Aloha, He'Ping, Om, Shalom, Salaam. Em Hotep, Peace Be, All My Relations. Omnia Bona Bonis, Adieu, Adios, Aloha. Amen. Roads End <A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A> DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of [EMAIL PROTECTED]</A> http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
