-Caveat Lector-

As Elaine used to say on Seinfeld..." OH MY GOD!"

Is this the best our elites can offer up from among
their progeny??? If it is, then I have found the solution
to the age old problem of domination by elites.

Let them continue interbreeding. One more generation of
Bushes, or Gores, or Kennedys, and we'll be home free.

Free at last. Free at last. Thank you Darwin.
Free at last.

Nurev

=================
October 9, 2000

     CHRISTOPHER HITCHENS


     Why Dubya Can't Read

                        E-mail this story to a friend.

                     I once knew a fairly intelligent man who
                     disconcerted me one day by
                     denouncing the arbitrary domination of
                     the then-Soviet Union by a
                     sinister-sounding body named "the
                     Politurbo." Allowance could be made in
     his case; not everybody understood the abbreviations of
     "agitprop" and the crude origins of Com-speak. Had the
     term been spelled out as "Political Bureau" I am sure he
     would have got there easily in the end. But what
     unhorsed me at the time was this: He must have seen
     the word "Politburo" in print many times, and also heard
     it spoken very often, without ever registering the
     connection.

     The term for this failure of mental word-processing is
     dyslexia, and it can occur in mild and severe forms. I
     used to have the job of tutoring a dyslexic child, and I
     know something about the symptoms. So I kicked
     myself hard when I read the profile of Governor George
     W. Bush, by my friend and colleague Gail Sheehy, in this
     month's Vanity Fair. All those jokes and cartoons and
     websites about his gaffes, bungles and malapropisms?
     We've been unknowingly teasing the afflicted. The poor
     guy is obviously dyslexic, and dyslexic to the point of
     near-illiteracy. Numerous experts and friends of the
     dynasty give Sheehy their considered verdict to this
     effect.

     The symptoms and clues have been staring us in the
     face for some time. Early in the campaign, Bush said
     that he did indeed crack the odd book and was even at
     that moment absorbed by James Chace's biography of
     Dean Acheson. But when asked to report anything that
     was in the damn volume, the governor pulled up an
     empty net. His brother Neil is an admitted dyslexic. His
     mother has long been a patron of various foundations
     and charities associated with dyslexia. How plain it all
     now seems.

     The rhetorical and linguistic train wrecks in the speeches
     of Reagan and Bush Senior were of a different quality,
     arising variously from hysterical lying, brutish ignorance,
     senile decay and cultural deprivation. But the problem
     was chiefly syntactical. The additional humiliations of
     Dubya derive from utter failures of word recognition. A
     man who has somehow got this far in politics and refers
     to "tacular" weapons is unclear (or do I mean nuclear?)
     on the concept. In free-trade language, tariffs and
     barriers are not necessarily conterminous, but in no
     circumstance are they "terriers." To use "vile" for "viable"
     might look like misfortune, but to employ "inebriating"
     for "enthralling" looks like carelessness, especially in
     someone with his booze and cocaine record. Bush
     doesn't want our enemies to "hold us hostile"; I must
     say I agree with what I'm sure he didn't mean to say.
     Confusing "handcuffs" with "cufflinks" might be a yuppie
     slip; at any rate it presumably doesn't mean softness on
     crime. As for "Reading is the basics of all learning," well,
     there you are.

     Does any of this matter? Of course it does. Bush has
     already claimed with hand on heart that he personally
     scrutinized the death-row appeals of more than a
     hundred condemned wretches in the shocking Texas
     prison system; we now have to face the fact that he not
     only did not review the clemency petitions but could not
     have read them even if he wanted to. Aides now
     remember the times they presented the governor or the
     candidate with that crucial briefing paper, only to see him
     toss it on the desk and demand a crisp, verbal, "bottom
     line" summary of its contents. Decisive, right? Wrong.

     I know from my teaching experience that nature very
     often compensates the dyslexic with a higher IQ or some
     grant of intuitive intelligence. If this is true for Bush it
     hasn't yet become obvious; his Texas chief of staff, Clay
     Johnson, told Gail Sheehy that the attention span of his
     boss is, not to euphemize matters overmuch,
     somewhere in the vicinity of fifteen minutes. In other
     words, and as far as we know, he has only the downside
     of his difficulty, which is attention-deficit disorder. In the
     high noon of the age of information, the Republican
     Party packages and presents a provincial ignoramus who
     can neither read nor write. Woof.

     But now here's another amazing thing. Nelson
     Rockefeller was dyslexic, though nobody knew it until
     after he'd become Vice President. Ronald Reagan's
     neurons and synapses were being devoured by
     Alzheimer's from at least... well, I'd say 1982 from
     personal observation, though experts differ. Bill Clinton
     was understood by some of the closest of his circle,
     including his awful wife, to be a pathological liar and
     sexual delinquent when he was still lucky enough to be
     governor of Arkansas. Usually, these and many other
     disqualifications, like Nixon's alcoholism, await the
     patient, too-late forensic attention of the court
     historians. Yet here's a man whose aides and flacks are
     visibly white-lipped every time he opens his mouth, and
     who should be seeking remedial care but is instead
     seeking the presidential therapy that he doesn't need,
     and nobody says a word. Nobody had the poor taste to
     follow up Gail Sheehy's findings.

     Ah, but Bush has a disability.... Can that be it? From
     "compassionate conservatism" to compassion for the
     conservative? Well, I'm ready to feel compassion for him.
     I want him to get all the help he needs (which will
     probably involve him in emulating his flabbergasting
     running mate and moving his official residence to
     another and more compassionate state). But I think, in
     presidential terms, we should leave this child back and
     let him catch up in his own special way at some later
     date.

     Meanwhile, the press and the Democrats should either
     stop citing and mocking the flubs or come right out and
     say what they mean. A danger of heartlessness, even of
     callousness, exists. Seeking to explain away his wastrel
     life and his obnoxious manner--nagging problems that
     persisted until his mid-40s--Bush invites us to believe
     that he mutated into finer personhood after having a
     personal encounter with God. The pious toads at the
     head of the Democratic ticket are full of unction at this
     and any other manifestation of hypocrisy. In a farcical
     recent moment, Bush contradicted his own mother, who
     claimed he'd always read his Bible as a youngster, by
     telling the Washington Post that he'd read no such
     thing. So--what if he had meant to say all along that
     he'd found a personal "dog"? The time to clear this up is
     now.

                                 E-mail this story to a friend.

============================
-- CUT OUT THE MIDDLEMEN --
JUST VOTE FOR A CORPORATION
============================

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to