-Caveat Lector-

WJPBR Email News List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Peace at any cost is a Prelude to War!

 <A HREF="http://drudgereport.com/bre.htm">MATT DRUDGE // DRUDGE REPORT 2000®
</A>
http://drudgereport.com/bre.htm

XXXXX DRUDGE REPORT XXXXX SUN DEC 03, 2000 20:29:31 ET XXXXX

CONTROVERSY SWIRLS AROUND SUPREME JUSTICE BREYER; COMMENTS MADE BY GORE
'FRIEND' INDICATE PREJUDICE

As the nation waits for the US Supreme Court to rule, Justice Stephen Breyer
found himself in the middle of complete controversy after Friday's historic
oral arguments where he indicated a prejudice against Florida's Secretary of
State.

Justice Breyer, appointed by the Clinton/Gore administration, slipped during
questioning and revealed just how Election 2000 has become a bitter battle
split down partisan lines -- even inside of the land's highest court!

Breyer stunned watchers inside of the courtroom as he grilled Joseph Klock, a
lawyer for Republican Secretary of State Katherine Harris. Justice Breyer
framed the debate by stating: Whether we win, whether your side wins.

"And now the secretary has certified a winner," Justice Breyer declared. "And
therefore, I guess, whether we win -- whether your side, the side you're
supporting wins or loses, it doesn't change that."

The Justice's view that he is on the opposing side of Secretary Harris, who
awarded George Bush the state's electoral votes, may be rooted in the fact
that Vice President Gore is a personal friend -- who argued vigorously for
the selection and confirmation of Breyer to the Court.

Gore was a driving force during formal meetings held by President Clinton's
Supreme Court search team in the Spring of 1994. During the sessions, a list
of a dozen prospects were considered to fill retiring Justice Harry
Blackmun's seat. In the end, the nomination was given to Breyer, a personal
friend of Gore's.

And Gore presided over Breyer's swearing-in ceremony.

"Justice Breyer has already given much," Gore intoned at the East Room
ceremony in August, 1994.

"But his greatest challenges lie ahead. The court he joins will no doubt face
questions of great difficulty and consequence. We will all need his wisdom to
help shape America's future into the next century and beyond."

On July 8, 1994, Gore said of Breyer: "Just speaking in personal terms, it is
a great pleasure to be able to promote the virtue of this particular
nomination. He is a friend and he is obviously an outstanding jurist... the
more you know him, the more you come to appreciate what he is really like --
his wife and his family and he, himself, are really wonderful people... His
whole approach to life, I think, is just a real model. I think he's a
wonderful person."

Breyer's "whether we win, whether your side wins" comment made in open court
on Friday ignited nonstop conversations throughout Washington, even though
the nation's main press has remained silent on the slip.

Said one insider: "What if Justice Scalia had made such a revealing comment?
Or Clarence Thomas? Another media lynching would have begun, at a minimum
with calls for recusal from Jesse Jackson."

One court staffer told the DRUDGE REPORT late Sunday, "I think you can now
understand why the justices would rather debate without the glare of the
camera, or even the broadcast microphone."

A Gore campaign spokesman refused to comment for this report.

-----------------------------------------------------------
Filed By Matt Drudge
Reports are moved when circumstances warrant
http://www.drudgereport.com for updates
(c)DRUDGE REPORT 2000



*COPYRIGHT NOTICE** In accordance with Title 17 U. S. C. Section 107,
any copyrighted work in this message is distributed under fair use
without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest
in receiving the included information for nonprofit research and educational
purposes only.[Ref. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml ]

Want to be on our lists?  Write at [EMAIL PROTECTED] for a menu of our lists!

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to