-Caveat Lector-

visit my web site at  http://www.voicenet.com/~wbacon
My ICQ# is 79071904

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2000 00:41:26 -0800
From: John G. Gunderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ACT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [Fwd: The Media]



Steve Riley wrote:

> The Media
>
> Here are a few simple questions about the coverage of
> the media's month-long telethon for the man who
> invented the Internet:
>
> How come, when the Florida Legislature has 58
> Democrats among its 160 members, it's always referred
> to as ''Republican-dominated,'' which it is, but the
> Florida Supreme Court, which includes zero
> Republicans, is never called ''Democrat-dominated''?
>
> How come when the Republican Legislature says it will
> follow the Constitution as written, it's a ''partisan
> political ploy,'' but when the Florida Supreme Court
> turns the law upside down to give Al Gore an extra 12
> days to steal the election, it's an impartial
> judiciary just doing its job?
>
> How come it's not ''hate speech'' when Bill Maher says
> on national TV Thursday night that as the country
> watched the Ryder van with the Palm Beach ballots
> moving up the Florida turnpike, ''For a few brief
> moments, America held the hope that O.J. Simpson had
> murdered Katherine Harris''?
>
> And how come it isn't ''mean-spirited'' when Craig
> Kilborn freeze-frames a picture of George W. Bush with
> a caption that says ''Snipers Wanted''?
>
> Probably for the same reason that it was permissible
> during impeachment for reputed actor Alec Baldwin to
> mention it might be a good idea to stone
> Representative Henry Hyde and his family to death.
>
> If you're a Beautiful Person from Hollywood and you
> suggest lynching Republicans, that's fair comment
> under the First Amendment. If you're a Republican and
> you live within 300 miles of a lynching, you may as
> well have personally knotted the rope.
>
> How come looking into the sex life of Bill Clinton,
> when it involves perjury, obstruction of justice and
> sexual harassment, is ''the politics of personal
> destruction,'' but, as Laura Ingraham noted, trying to
> dig up dirt on Katherine Harris' sex life is
> investigative journalism?
>
> How come when Bill Clinton gets 60 percent approval
> for anything it's a ''mandate'' but when 60 percent of
> the country wants Al Gore to throw in the towel the
> caption at the bottom of the screen is ''The Nation
> Divided''?
>
> How come George Bush has an MBA from Harvard Biz and
> he's a moron and Al Gore ''dropped out'' of Vanderbilt
> Law School and he's a genius?
>
> How come no one on TV can mention Katherine Harris
> without remarking on the fact that she worked in the
> Bush campaign, but outside a handful of newspapers, no
> one ever points out that Florida attorney general Bob
> Butterworth was chairman of Al Gore's campaign in the
> Sunshine State?
>
> How come so few media outlets picked up the Miami
> Herald story that hundreds, probably thousands, of
> ex-cons illegally cast ballots in Florida?
>
> How come, after the Republicans lost their bid to
> convict Bill Clinton of high crimes and misdemeanors
> in the Senate, the left wing Ivy League chattering
> skulls said as one that it was time for America to
> ''move on''?  But now, even after Al Gore has lost
> recount after recount, you could forfeit your
> invitation to Renaissance Weekend by suggesting that
> it's now time for America to ''move on.''
>
> How come, on election night, Al Gore ''won'' states
> but they always ''fell'' to George Bush?
>
> How come it's always germane to point out that seven
> of the nine members of the U.S. Supreme Court were
> appointed by Republican presidents (even though at
> least two of them have since flipped sides), but it's
> not even worth 10 seconds to say that basically all
> seven Florida jurists were appointed by Democrats?
>
> Why does no one ever mention that one of the Florida
> justices is so ignorant that during one hearing he
> referred to the ''Electorial College''?
>
> How come all the Gore partisans in the press keep
> referring to the Seminole County case as involving
> ''ballot tampering,'' when actually it's applications
> for ballots? And why do you have to go to Florida
> newspapers to find out that the judge hearing the case
> had her campaign do exactly the same thing when she
> was running?
>
> All in all, this campaign of disinformation is just
> what you'd expect from these "impartial" journalists,
> and it's only going to get worse before their hero
> gets the job he so richly deserves: ambassador to Chad.

--
"The moment the idea is admitted into society that property is not as
sacred as the law of God, and that there is not a force of law and
public justice to protect it, anarchy and tyranny commence." -- John
Adams

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to