-Caveat Lector-
What a bunch of uadulterated crap. Talk about puffing up.
The very BEST thing about Libertarians is that they are so
irrelevant. They don't even show up in political poles.
Because Libertarians are essentially anti democratic, they
will never get a majority backing. This is the second best thing
about Liberatrians.
I love Libertarians. They are so obnoxiously cute.
Joshua2
=================
kl wrote:
>
> -Caveat Lector-
>
> They
> http://www.lewrockwell.com/delemos/delemos11.html
>
> They Love Us: The Anti-Libertarian Press
> by Michael Gilson De Lemos
>
> Libertarians see a certain amount of crazy press. That goes with
> the territory if you seem new, are refining your message, and take
> on the dark side of social institutions. The system will alternately
> say your message is crazy, marginal, not new.
>
> You�ll be identified with those you oppose. You�ll be blamed for
> every ill. Your triumphs will be blandly ascribed to others. Other�s
> inanities will be ascribed on you.
>
> You�ll be a social Rorschach Blot test. Well-meaning people will
> latch on to a portion of your message, and on the rest unwittingly
> project provincial ignorance, foolishness, or fear. Things ho-hum for
> others, associated with you, are scandals.
>
> Aristotle had a technical term for this in his political theory. He
> called it: "That�s life in the big city."
>
> Still, Libertarians have noticed loony rhetoric and well-meaning
> mangled explanations reaching new levels � with strident attacks
> and smears by establishment and government-licensed media.
> Libertarians are being shot at, big time.
>
> The reason? While many newer Libertarians are unclear on what
> Libertarians have accomplished, the Establishment is very aware
> that Libertarians were key players in every major positive
> development in the last generation. From the collapse of the Soviet
> Union to the fact that it must now figure out how to control 200 TV
> stations and the internet (instead of 4 well-behaved networks and
> home presses), the Establishment views Libertarians as a
> headache at best � harbingers of an uncontrollable new era at
> worst.
>
> While a prominent Republican politico stated he felt Libertarians
> were the shock troops of a the second phase of the American
> Revolution, the question in his mind was not whether Libertarians
> would endure.
>
> It was whether either Libertarians would be a large third force
> in two generations � or the militant second party facing a last ditch
> union of the shattered major ones.
>
> Like Waiting for Godot, another admitted, uncertain policymakers
> are now "Waiting for the Libertarians." What can they
> make of Libertarian Governor Bush advisor like Dr. Randall
> Holcombe saying Libertarians have won the war of ideas?
>
> Libertarians must coolly realize growing attacks are a positive
> development, and refocus on their strengths and positive
> contributions. That is what it means to be a profound moral
> discipline � and international social-political movement not just
> against international war, but that silent and demeaning war of
> citizen against citizen built on the obsolete and dying institution of
> coercive, non-rights based government.
>
> And that is why we�re seeing, now in one week, near-identical
> attacks from Right and Left, with frantic associations of Libertarians
> with every ill created by the government and its pet "necessary"
> monopolies and rah-rah foundations � even as Libertarians are
> dismissed as minor irritants. The day is still to come when unless
> a Libertarian inspector is there, the public will know the alleged
> privatization, deregulation or rights-restoration is a fraud. Thus, in
> the last week, three amazing anti-Libertarian articles.
>
> We�ll see more.
>
> >From the populist-Right Liberty Lobby, Libertarians are not only
> blamed for the energy crisis in California, about whose phony
> privatization Libertarians actually sounded the alarm, but magnified
> as conspirators of titanic economic collapse that would make
> James Bond envious.
>
> >From the Left Village Voice, an attack that says the exact same
> thing, in denouncing Libertarian anarchists (yay!) who will Godzilla-
> like destructively control (huh?) one-third of the U.S land mass via
> the Interior Department. The local-communitarian Left suddenly
> loves distant bureaucracy when Libertarians annoyingly
> sympathize with Indian and local eco-claims to "government" lands
> Both identify Libertarians with coercive government-sweetheart
> crony-capitalists who, often, are actually Democratic Contributors.
> More: In a third article, officials unaware of their superior�s new line
> that Libertarians are now the powerful, sinister destroyers
> controlling the US economy, dismiss Libertarians as
> "inconsequential crackpots" �especially when their politicians
> defect.
>
> Libertarians have no shadowy agenda, merely one a decadent
> society has trouble grasping. Libertarians� message is simple.
> Government is an auto-toxic institution, reinforcing the petty
> thievery people mutually inflict.
>
> In a world where various groups define their brand of government
> corruption and intolerance as all right, Libertarians are different.
>
> Libertarians will fight any corruption, undermine any intolerance,
> question any prejudice, support any voluntary option, protect
> property as the wall against oppression, and be the idealists of a
> new voluntary economy.
>
> Hence Leftists paradoxically denounce Libertarian anarchic
> limousine-liberals. Rightists paradoxically denounce supposed
> Libertarian support of behind-the-scenes Rightist moneybags.
>
> They�ve not lost their wits, but bearings. They�re the Hindu two
> loving, blind caretakers who, finding a baby elephant, feeling only
> trunk and tail, argued bitterly how big the snake will grow to be.
>
> February 3, 2000
>
> Michael Gilson De Lemos, known as MG (articles at
> www.gilson.uni.cc), is Coordinator of the Libertarian International
> Organization. He believes with Jefferson that, along with Gibbon,
> Cicero and Tacitus should be read by all grade-schoolers. In Latin.
> Copyright 2001 LewRockwell.com
>
> --
>
> I still believe in liberalism today as much as I ever did, but, oh,
> there was a happy time when I believed in liberals...
> --G. K. Chesterton
>
<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please! These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
<A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
<A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
