-Caveat Lector-

http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/health/newsid_1263000/1263758.stm

A controversial operation to transplant the
              whole head of a monkey onto a different body
              has proved a partial success.

              The scientist behind it wants to do the same
              thing to humans, but other members of the
              scientific community have condemned the
              experiments as "grotesque".

              Professor Robert White, from Cleveland Ohio,
              transplanted a whole monkey's head onto
              another monkey's body, and the animal
              survived for some time after the operation.

              The professor told the BBC's Today programme
              how he believes the operation is the next step
              in the transplant world.

              And he raised the possibility that it could be
              used to treat people paralysed and unable to
              use their limbs, and whose bodies, rather than
              their brains, were diseased.

              "People are dying today
              who, if they had body
              transplants, in the
              spinal injury community
              would remain alive."

              He said that in the
              experiment, his team
              had been able to:
              "transplant the brain as a separate organ into
              an intact animal and maintain it in a viable, or
              living situation for many days."

              He added: "We've been able to retain the brain
              in the skull, and in the head."

              That, he said meant the monkey was
              conscious, and that it could see, hear, taste
              and smell because the nerves were left intact
              in the head.

              He admitted that it could appear "grotesque",
              but said there had been ethical considerations
              throughout the history of organ transplants.

              "At each stage - kidney, heart, liver and so
              forth - ethical considerations have been
              considered, especially with the heart, which
              was a major, major problem for many people
              and scientists.

              "And the brain, because of its uniqueness
              poses a major, major ethical issue as far as the
              public and even the profession is concerned."

              'Scientifically misleading'

              The arguments against head and brain
              transplants were outlined by Dr Stephen Rose,
              director of brain and behavioural research at
              the Open University.

              He said: "This is medical technology run
              completely mad and out of all proportion to
              what's needed.

              "It's entirely misleading to suggest that a head
              transplant or a brain transplant is actually
              really still connected in anything except in
              terms of blood stream to the body to which it
              has been transplanted.

              "It's not controlling or relating to that body in
              any other sort of way."

              He added: "It's scientifically misleading,
              technically irrelevant and scientifically
              irrelevant, and apart from anything else a
              grotesque breach of any ethical consideration."

              "It's a mystification to call it either a head
              transplant or a brain transplant.

              "All you're doing is keeping a severed head
              alive in terms of the circulation from another
              animal. It's not connected in any nervous
              sense."

              The issue of who someone who had received a
              head transplant would "be" is extremely
              complicated, said Professor Rose.

              "Your person is largely embodied but not
              entirely in your brain".

              He added: "I cannot see any medical grounds
              for doing this. I cannot see that scientifically
              you would actually be able to regenerate the
              nerves which could produce that sort of
              control.

              "And I think that the experiments are the sort
              that are wholly unethical and inappropriate for
              any possible reason."

              He added that the way to help the quadriplegic
              community was to work on research to help
              spinal nerves regenerate.

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to