-Caveat Lector-

From
http://seattle.indymedia.org/display.php3?article_id=3013

}}>Begin
webcast news
Gag Order Lifted; IMC in Free Speech Battle Following FBI/Secret Service Visit

by JL for the Seattle IMC Spokescouncil         9:49am Fri Apr 27 '01
This is an official announcement from the Seattle IMC Spokescouncil
On the evening of Saturday, April 21, a day which saw tens of thousands demonstrate
against the FTAA in the streets of Quebec City, the Independent Media Center in
Seattle was served with a sealed court order by two FBI agents and an agent of the
US Secret Service. The terms of the sealed order prevented IMC volunteers from
publicizing its contents; volunteers immediately began discussions with legal
counsel to amend the order. This morning, April 27, Magistrate Judge Monica Benton
issued an amended order, freeing us to discuss the situation without the threat of
being held in contempt.
The original order, also issued by Judge Benton, directed the IMC to supply the FBI
with "all user connection logs" for April 20 and 21st from a web server occupying an
IP address which the Secret Service believed belonged to the IMC. The order stated
that this was part of an "ongoing criminal investigation" into acts that could
constitute violations of Canadian law, specifically theft and mischief. IMC legal
counsel David Sobel, of the Electronic Privacy Information Center, comments: "As the
U.S. Supreme Court has recognized, the First Amendment protects the right to
communicate anonymously with the press and for political purposes. An order
compelling the disclosure of information identifying an indiscriminately large
number of users of a website devoted to political discourse raises very serious
constitutional issues.  To provide the same protection to the press and anonymous
sources in the Internet world as with more traditional media, the Government must be
severely limited in its ability to demand their Internet identity--their "Internet
Protocol addresses."  A federal statute alrea
dy requires that such efforts against the press be approved by the Attorney General, 
and only where
 essential and after alternatives have been exhausted.  There is no suggestion that 
these standards
 were met here.
The sealed court order also directed the IMC not to disclose "the existence of this 
Application or
Order, or the existence of this investigation, unless or until ordered by this court." 
  Such a pri
or restraint on a media
 organization goes to the heart of the First Amendment.  Ironically, the Seattle 
Post-Intelligencer
 learned about the existence of the order from "federal sources," suggesting that the 
purpose of th
e gag order was simply
to allow the government to spin the issue its way.
The order did not specify what acts were being investigated, and the Secret Service 
agent acknowled
ged that the IMC itself was not suspected of criminal activity. No violation of US law 
was alleged.
 It is not clear whethe
r federal law allows the Attorney General ever to approve such an investigation of US 
press entitie
s to facilitate a foreign investigation.  According to IMC counsel Lee Tien of the 
Electronic Front
ier Foundation, "This k
ind of fishing expedition is another in a long line of overbroad and onerous attempts 
to chill poli
tical speech and activism. Back in 1956, Alabama tried to force the NAACP to give up 
its membership
 lists -- but the Supre
me Court stopped them.  This order to IMC, even without the 'gag,' is a threat to free 
speech, free
 association, and privacy."
Responding to questions from IMC volunteers, the agents claimed that their 
investigation concerned
the source of either one or two postings which, they said, had been posted to an IMC 
newswire early
 Saturday morning. Thes
e posts, according to the agents, contained documents stolen from a Canadian 
government agency, inc
luding classified information related to the travel itinerary of George W. Bush (who 
was at that ti
me in Quebec City, part
icipating in Summit of the Americas meetings). Agents claimed that the Secret Service 
was notified
of the existence of such posts by a tip from an (unnamed) major commercial news 
network.
The agents were unable to provide URL addresses or titles for the postings they 
described. Addition
ally, the court order contained a non-working IP address, rather than an address 
assigned to any of
 the IMC sites. IMC vol
unteers nevertheless were able to identify two articles posted to the Montreal IMC 
which partially
matched the agents' incomplete description. These articles, posted first in French and 
then in Engl
ish translations ( HYPE
RLINK "http://montreal.indymedia.org/front.php3?article_id=505"; 
http://montreal.indymedia.org/front
.php3?article_id=505 , 514 and 515), contain sections of documents purportedly stolen 
from a Quebec
 City police car during
 Friday night anti-FTAA demonstrations; the documents detail police strategies for 
hindering protes
ters' mass action. It does not appear that any materials were posted to any IMC site 
containing Bus
h travel plans.
Although the agents were concerned with only two posts, the court order demands "all 
user connectio
ns logs" for a 48-hour period, which would include individual IP addresses for every 
person who pos
ted materials to or vis
ited the IMC site during the FTAA protests. IMC legal counsel Nancy Chang, of the 
Center for Consti
tutional Rights, comments that "the overbroad sweep of the information demanded by the 
FBI raises t
he disturbing question
of whether the order is calculated to discourage association with the IMC."
The agents arrived at the IMC around 7pm. Seattle IMC volunteers had been busy all 
afternoon gather
ing regional IMC coverage of FTAA protests underway in Seattle and in Blaine, 
Washington, and coord
inating coverage with o
ther sites on the IMC network. Several visitors were also in the IMC at the time, 
using public comp
uters.. While agents were speaking with one staff volunteer, another began making 
telephone calls i
n an effort to contact
legal counsel. After the agents left, volunteers discussed the court order's gag 
provision, and beg
an recontacting the handful of people who had already been called, in order to make 
sure that the t
erms of the court order
 would not be violated before legal counsel had time to appraise the situation.
Initial attempts were made to contain news of the FBI/Secret Service visit; however, a 
few details
of the story were soon leaked via a partially accurate report broadcast on the Vermont 
IMC internet
 radio stream. Soon the
 Seattle IMC was flooded with phone calls requesting information about what quickly 
began to be des
cribed as an "FBI raid," and speculations began to spread rapidly across the 
open-publishing newswi
res of various IMCs.
For about three hours, a network of IMC technology volunteers attempted to  comply 
with the court o
rder by removing such  posts from the Seattle IMC and other major IMC sites as they 
appeared. This
had the unfortunate eff
ect of seemingly confirming the worst suspicions of independent journalists who posted 
brief articl
es announcing or speculating about mysterious and terrible things going on at the 
Seattle IMC, then
 finding their posts re
moved from view minutes later.  Volunteers called off this clumsy attempt at rumor 
control around m
idnight, when it became clear that removing of posts was only serving to fan the 
flames of rumor, a
nd that in any case the
 story had already spread beyond the confines of the IMC network. In acting to remove 
these posts,
IMC volunteers were motivated by fear of violating the court order's gag provision 
even before lega
l counsel had had a cha
nce to review the document. We regret the feelings of confusion and disempowerment 
which many users
 of the IMC sites experienced due to Saturday night's blackout of postings on this 
topic, and the g
eneral frustration caus
ed by the gag order.
Since the incident occurred, several persistent, yet false, rumors have taken shape; 
some of these
found their way into coverage published in Monday's Seattle Post-Intelligencer and 
other commercial
 media. We can now disp
el some of the more common of these: No search warrant was served to the IMC in 
connection with the
 court order, and nobody connected to the Seattle IMC has been arrested. No equipment 
or logs have
been seized; the agents
' visit was not a "raid."
Now, free from restrictive court orders, the Seattle IMC will be able to cover this 
important story
 as it continues to unfold.
The Seattle Independent Media Center was launched in Fall 1999 to provide immediate, 
authentic, gra
ssroots coverage of protests against the WTO. Just a year and a half later, the IMC 
network has rea
ched around the world,
with dozens of sites scattered across six continents. IMCs are autonomously organized 
and administe
red, but share collective organizational principles and certain technological 
resources. Each IMC's
 news coverage centers
upon its open-publishing newswire, an innovative and democratizing system allowing
anyone with access to an Internet connection to become a journalist, reporting on
events from his or her own perspective rather than being forced to rely on the
narrow range of views presented by corporate-owned mainstream media sources.
During last weekend's widespread protests against a proposed Free Trade Area of the
Americas, many IMC sites collaborated to produce comprehensive coverage of
demonstrations taking place in Quebec City and Sao Paulo, as well as solidarity
protests in cities across the U.S. and along the Mexican and Canadian borders. The
breadth and depth of coverage produced by the IMC's global network eclipsed that of
many corporate media outlets.
The Seattle IMC remains committed to its mission: "The Independent Media Center is a
grassroots organization committed to using media production and distribution as a
tool for promoting social and economic justice. It is our goal to further the self-
determination of people under-represented in media production and content, and to
illuminate and analyze local and global issues that impact ecosystems, communities
and individuals. We seek to generate alternatives to the biases inherent in the
corporate media controlled by profit, and to identify and create positive models for
a sustainable and equitable society."

>>>From another part of the site<<<

   Jaggi Singh will not be released until his trial, which could be months away.
His bail hearing at the Quebec City Courthouse ended today
amidst quelled tears of indignation.  Judge Yvon Mercier relied
chiefly on the testimony of municipal police inspector Srgt. F. Colin.
The account of defense witness Judy Rebick was transformed beyond
recognition.  Audience members were escorted out by Quebec provincial
police at the slightest sound of emotion.
End<{{

T' A<>E<>R
Forwarded as information only; no endorsement to be presumed
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material
is distributed without charge or profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this type of information
for non-profit research and educational purposes only.
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Integrity has no need of rules. -Albert Camus (1913-1960)
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
The only real voyage of discovery consists not in seeking
new landscapes but in having new eyes. -Marcel Proust
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The libertarian therefore considers one of his prime educational
tasks is to spread the demystification and desanctification of the
State among its hapless subjects.  His task is to demonstrate
repeatedly and in depth that not only the emperor but even the
"democratic" State has no clothes; that all governments subsist
by exploitive rule over the public; and that such rule is the reverse
of objective necessity.  He strives to show that the existence of
taxation and the State necessarily sets up a class division between
the exploiting rulers and the exploited ruled.  He seeks to show that
the task of the court intellectuals who have always supported the State
has ever been to weave mystification in order to induce the public to
accept State rule and that these intellectuals obtain, in return, a
share in the power and pelf extracted by the rulers from their deluded
subjects.
[[For a New Liberty:  The Libertarian Manifesto, Murray N. Rothbard,
Fox & Wilkes, 1973, 1978, p. 25]]

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to