-Caveat Lector- From http://www.monde-diplomatique.fr/en/2001/04/05americassummit }}>Begin April 2001 Contents Britain: a rolling crisis The continuing war in Algeria * Truth and justice * The hidden history of the Algerian war * Chasing the holy grail of free trade KLA exports Albanian conflict to Macedonia * Congo: a war without victors How can I forget they killed my whole family? * An alternative model for agriculture * Man's inhumanity to man * Israel and the memory of the Holocaust The struggle for women's rights in Togo * Depleted uranium: a reply by the World Health Organisation * search the site: to receive our free monthly summaries, please fill in your e-mail address (*) Star-marked articles are restricted to subscribers only. See subscription information. TOWARDS A 'FREE TRADE AREA OF THE AMERICAS' Chasing the holy grail of free trade At the heart of the free-trade doctrine lies the conviction that exports drive growth. If every country, or group of countries, were to act in accordance with this belief, the contest would in theory become a zero-sum gam e as long as the players had comparable levels of development. But it is quite another thing when development levels are unequal. Removing trade barriers means that the strong get stronger, and drives weaker countries fur ther into dependence, preventing them from fashioning policies to meet the needs of their populations, especially in agricultural matters. Such is the logic of the proposed Free Trade Area of the Americas, which will be u p for discussion at the Quebec summit on 20-22 April. The FTAA proposes to extend throughout the continent the provisions of the North American Free Trade Agreement, which has already ruined Mexican agriculture. Backed by Washington, the FTAA is so untenable for the other nations of the hemisphere that their parliaments were not even told of its provisions. These countries are now ready to deliver a resounding 'no' to the FTAA. by DORVAL BRUNELLE * The proposed Free Trade Area of the Americas (FTAA) agreement will come under discussion in Quebec City on 20-22 April. The FTAA project stemmed from the Enterprise for the Americas Initiative, proposed by President Georg e Bush Sr. in June 1990 and initiated by his successor, Bill Clinton, at the first Summit for the Americas held in Miami in December 1994 (1). In that same year the North American Free Trade Agreement (Nafta), signed by C anada, the United States and Mexico, came into effect. Heads of state and government from 34 nations of the Western hemisphere (excluding Cuba) will be attending the upcoming third Summit for the Americas. At the urging of the new US president George W Bush and his trade representative, Robert Zoellick, the pace of FTAA negotiations is to be accelerated. The negotiations, originally scheduled to be completed by 2005, aim to extend Nafta's provisions throughout the Western hemisphere and seek to enshrine the principles of national treatment and non-discrimination within all sectors, most notably in those pertaining to services, investments a nd governmental contracts. Indeed the standards pertaining to investments were among the most contentious provisions in the ill-fated Multilateral Agreement on Investment (MAI). For example, Nafta's chapter 11 allows fore ign investors to bring proceedings against countries in case of losses caused by the application of public standards, such as those relating to environmental protection. As a result, the Mexican government had to pay $16. 7m to the California-based Metalclad Corporation because the Mexican state of San Luis Potosi denied Metalclad permission to install a waste disposal facility that posed a public health hazard and against which the local population had voiced its strong opposition (2). In its current form, the FTAA aims to integrate a dozen sectors, divided into four main "baskets": education, democracy/human rights, poverty and economic integration. However, it is in the economic arena that the implica tions of hemispheric free trade are most evident. Moreover, a lavish gift to the multinationals is being prepared on the quiet: a new wave of deregulation and privatisation. Washington will agree not to enforce its anti-d umping laws and will grant access to the North American market for foodstuffs produced by countries of the South. At the fifth trade ministerial meeting held in November 1999 in Toronto, the negotiating groups were given a mandate to draw up a framework commercial agreement for the sixth such meeting, in Buenos Aires on 6-7 April, a little more than two weeks before the Quebec summit. Lopsided and unequal A statistical overview may provide a better understanding of what is at stake in the FTAA negotiations and may shed light on the potential consequences for the parties involved. Although neoliberal policies aimed at boost ing Latin America's under-developed status have been in effect for two decades, more than 36% of Latin American households - some 220m people - were still living in poverty at the beginning of last year. This figure is si milar to the 1994 level and slightly higher than it was in 1980 (3). As of last year, the three Americas (North, Central and South) had 750m inhabitants and their gross domestic product (GDP) totalled $11,000bn - although the relative weight of the individual economies was extremely unequa l. The US' share of the total GDP was 75.7%, compared to Brazil's 6.7%, Canada's 5.3% and Mexico's 3.9%. The other 31 countries represented only 8.4%, with Nicaragua and Haiti each representing 1/2,000th of the total. The data for per capita GDP also confirm this lopsided trend: the US led the way at $30,600, followed by Canada ($19,320), Argentina ($7,600), Uruguay ($5,900), Brazil ($4,420) and Mexico ($4,400). At the other end of the sc ale Nicaragua's per capita GDP was $430 and Haiti's was $460, or 70 times less than that of the US (4). These examples of lopsidedness and inequality raise a number of questions and problems, including the potential effects of profound economic integration on the so-called "small-sized" economies, for which no development f unds or safety nets have been provided. The strategy of conducting the FTAA negotiations behind closed doors has thus far served the various governments well. Over the past few months the 900 negotiators have focused on the provisions of the 1994 Miami summit, even though the multilateral negotiations were temporarily suspended. Indeed, while the French government wrested back control of the MAI from its negotiators at the Organisation for Economic Development and Cooperation ( OEDC) in October 1998 and the WTO Millennium Round of negotiations broke down in December 1999 in Seattle, the FTAA project kept apace without encountering significant opposition. The top-secret, closed-door nature of the FTAA discussions has meant that neither ordinary people nor their elected representatives have been informed of the details of the negotiations. Moreover, representatives of the b usiness community, reunited under the banner of the Americas Business Forum (ABF), have obtained no less than official status at the talks (5). The ABF's role is a crucial one since "many of the recommendations proposed b y participants at the San Jose Forum [Costa Rica] are reflected in the mandate of FTAA negotiating groups and in the plan of action that came out of the 1998 summit of the Americas" (6). Nevertheless, the elected representatives' limited role has set the tone and atmosphere for the FTAA negotiations. The same may be said for the Parliamentary Conference of the Americas (known by its French acronym Copa), which includes elected representatives from 35 countries, 164 provincial and state legislatures, as well as delegates from various regional legislative bodies. In the declaration issued at Copa's second general assembly h eld in Rio Grande (Puerto Rico) last July, the organisation urged heads of state and governments to take into account the level of development of the countries affected by the proposed FTAA agreement and to ensure the par ticipation of elected representatives from all jurisdictions to ensure transparency. Thus far no executive-branch leaders have acted on these recommendations. Geraldo Magela Pereira, Copa's newly elected president and a member of Brazil's National Congress, subsequently requested that a Copa delegation be granted observer status at the Quebec summit. Pereira was informed that h is request could not accommodated owing to the summit's timetable (7). Parallel summits Over the course of the FTAA negotiations, various organisations from all over the Western hemisphere, representing some 35 countries (including Cuba), have set up a number of national and sectoral anti-FTAA networks. At t he Denver trade ministerial meeting in 1995, the trade union movement, supported by the Inter-American Regional Labour Organisation (known by its French acronym, Orit) - the Western hemispheric branch of the International Confederation of Free Trade Unions (ICFTU) - set up a parallel conference. The participants followed up with a declaration outlining their various concerns and grievances. Similarly, in 1996 in Cartagena (Colombia) the trade union organisations of the Americas issued a new discussion paper and sought to bring pressure to bear on the governmental representatives. The latter, in their own joi nt ministerial declaration, recognised "the importance of the further observance and promotion of worker rights and the need to consider appropriate processes in this area, through our respective governments." In December 1996 the presidents of the member states of the Southern Common Market (Mercosur) (8) and the presidents of Chile and Bolivia met in Fortaleza (Brazil). The largest American trade union group (AFL-CIO), in con junction with Orit, sent a delegation to support various South American trade union groups that had called for an international day to commemorate the struggle for Mercosur workers' rights. Shortly thereafter, in parallel with the third trade ministerial meeting held in Belo Horizonte (Brazil) in May 1997, representatives of the trade union organisations of the Americas met with delegates from various anti-f ree-trade groups at the third trade union summit. The anti-free-trade coalitions have subsequently tried to find common ground and to come up with alternatives to the systematic liberalisation of health services, educatio n, investments and governmental contracts. The most innovative of the measures adopted at the trade union summit was the decision to launch the Hemispheric Social Alliance (HSA), thereby establishing a broad-based coaliti on with a view to developing "viable and concrete alternatives to the FTAA" (9). In 1998 the principal national coalitions successfully organised the first Summit of the Peoples of the Americas, held in Santiago (Chile) on 14-17 April 1998 in parallel with the second Summit of the Americas. The Summit of the Peoples of the Americas was convened by five national anti-free-trade coalitions, four of which were based in North America: the US Alliance for Responsible Trade (Art), the Mexican Action Network on Free Trade (R MALC), Common Frontiers-Canada and the Quebec Network on Hemispheric Integration (RQIC). The host coalition, the Chilean Action Network for People's Initiative (Rechip) (10), is based in South America. Other organisations that also took part in the Peoples' Summit included Orit; various environmental, feminist and indigenous groups; and the Brazilian Institute for Social and Economic Analysis (Ibase). Alternatives for the Americas The first Summit of the Peoples of the Americas was a signal moment in the history of the anti-free-trade movement. Activists from far afield found broad areas of agreement, culminating in the release of a draft document entitled "Alternatives for the Americas. Building a people's hemispheric agreement". National-level coalitions were becoming broader and further reaching. The Brazilian Network for the Integration of the People (Rebrip) w as founded; and Central America then formed its own coalition, the Civil Initiative for Central American Integration (Icic), while the Latin American Congress of Farmworkers' Organisations (Cloc) joined forces with the HS A. On a national level these groups in turn are rallying a growing number of organisations from within civil societies in the Western hemisphere. Stemming from the work begun in Belo Horizonte, "Alternatives for the Americas" represents an important milestone in the ambitious effort to form a social alliance encompassing an impressive number of sectors and particip ants from the 35 civil societies of the Americas. The document makes the following arguments: trade and investment should not be considered as ends in themselves but rather as means leading towards equitable and sustainab le development. It is essential that all citizens exercise their right to take part in the formulation, implementation and evaluation of the hemisphere's social and economic policies. Moreover, the primary goal of such po licies should be to promote economic sovereignty and collective welfare, while reducing inequalities at all levels. In November 1999 close to 200 HSA representatives gathered in Toronto to coincide with the fifth trade ministerial meeting. The HSA members successfully consolidated their alliance and laid the groundwork for the Quebec s ummit. Unanimous resolutions were passed denouncing the clandestine nature of the FTAA negotiations and calling for greater transparency. In particular the member coalitions of the HSA are calling for the details of the A mericas agreement to be made public in a timely fashion. All the same, transparency issues are secondary to the more disturbing general trend. The FTAA negotiations under way have involved the creation of a partisan regime, one based on extensive collaboration between governmen ts and the business sector. This system is even more selective and doctrinaire (if such a thing is conceivable) than that found at the multilateral level. This same strategy, while undoubtedly explaining the negotiations' stunning pace, has also lent credence to the rising tide of anti-FTAA sentiment and to the criticisms of the democratic deficit that has characterised the FTAA negotiations throughout the Americas. FTAA opponents will be out in full force in Quebec City: the HSA's member coalitions, disturbed at the prospect of economic integration in the West, are far from being alone. Non-violent action groups, regional coalitions and issue-based groups from all over the Americas will also be making their presence felt. Moreover, events will not be limited to those held in Quebec City or Buenos Aires, where the sixth trade ministerial meeting take s place on 6-7 April, since the anti-FTAA groups will also be organising parallel summits concurrently in other locations. Opposition to globalisation has become more entrenched since the events in Seattle, Prague and Nice. It remains to be seen, however, both in Quebec City and elsewhere, to what extent the various parallel anti-FTAA summits will be in keeping with the spirit of last January's World Social Forum in Porto Alegre (Brazil) and what contributions they will make to next year's forum. * Professor in the department of sociology of the University of Quebec at Montreal and co-director of the Groupe de recherche sur l'int�gration continentale (Hemispheric Integration Research Group). Author of Droit et exc lusion: critique de l'ordre lib�ral, L'Harmattan, Paris/Montreal, 1997 (1) The Plan of Action released at the conclusion of the first summit was reformulated and clarified at the second summit for heads of state and government held in Santiago (Chile) in April 1998. (2) Caminando, Paris, December 2000. (3) "La brecha de la equidad: una secunda evaluaci�n" (The Equity Gap: A Second Evaluation), Economic Commission for Latin America (Cepal), Santiago, Chile, June 2000. (4) Calculations are based on data published in the Bilan du Monde (World Assessment), Paris, 2001. (5) The Plan of Action stemming from the second Americas summit states that governments agree to "facilitate private sector participation in local and transnational infrastructure projects, that can serve as a basis for b ilateral and multilateral agreements." (6) ABF-Canada, Document d'information, Fifth Americas Business Forum, Toronto, 1 November 1999. (7) Copa made its request at the beginning of this year. See the Bulletin de la COPA, Quebec City, February 2001. It should be noted that Copa has its roots in an initiative of Quebec's National Assembly (Quebec's provincial legislature). In the eyes of the Canadian federal government in Ottawa, this has irrevocably tainted Copa. The Canadian government responded by proposing the creation of the Inter- American Parliamentary Forum (IAPF), to be placed under the auspices of the Organisation of American States. The members of the IAPF would be determined by the executive-branch leaders. For the time being the Canadian federal initiative seems to have stalled. (8) Argentina, Brazil, Uruguay and Paraguay. (9) "Des alternatives pour les Am�riques. Vers un accord entre les peoples du continent" (Alternatives for the Americas. Building a People's Hemispheric Agreement), preliminary version, October 1998, p. 5. (10) The Chilean coalition is now called the Chilean Alliance for Just and Responsible Trade (ACJR). Translated by Luke Sandford ALL RIGHTS RESERVED � 1997-2001 Le Monde diplomatique End<{{ T' A<>E<>R Forwarded as information only; no endorsement to be presumed + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without charge or profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving this type of information for non-profit research and educational purposes only. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + Integrity has no need of rules. -Albert Camus (1913-1960) + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + The only real voyage of discovery consists not in seeking new landscapes but in having new eyes. -Marcel Proust ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ The libertarian therefore considers one of his prime educational tasks is to spread the demystification and desanctification of the State among its hapless subjects. His task is to demonstrate repeatedly and in depth that not only the emperor but even the "democratic" State has no clothes; that all governments subsist by exploitive rule over the public; and that such rule is the reverse of objective necessity. He strives to show that the existence of taxation and the State necessarily sets up a class division between the exploiting rulers and the exploited ruled. He seeks to show that the task of the court intellectuals who have always supported the State has ever been to weave mystification in order to induce the public to accept State rule and that these intellectuals obtain, in return, a share in the power and pelf extracted by the rulers from their deluded subjects. [[For a New Liberty: The Libertarian Manifesto, Murray N. Rothbard, Fox & Wilkes, 1973, 1978, p. 25]] <A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A> DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of [EMAIL PROTECTED]</A> http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
