-Caveat Lector-

WJPBR Email News List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Peace at any cost is a Prelude to War!

Chinese ship challenges Australian navy flotilla
By David Rennie in Beijing and Geoffrey Lee Martin in Sydney






 News - United Nations


 Oceans and law of the sea - United Nations


 Australian Department of Defence


 Ministry of Foreign Affairs - People's Republic of China


 News - White House


 China Daily



  A CHINESE warship challenged an Australian naval flotilla for "intruding"
even though it was in international sea lanes at the time, it emerged
yesterday.
A spokesman for the Australian Department of Defence said the incident, which
happened "earlier this month", involved at least one frigate whose captain
rejected the Chinese challenge and sailed on. He said: "The Australian naval
vessels were challenged by a Chinese naval vessel which claimed that the
Australians were intruding on Chinese waters.

"At all times the Australian ships were steaming in international waters and
abiding by international rights under the 1982 Laws of the Sea Convention and
so the captain insisted on proceeding." Precise details of the ships and
locations were "classified information", he said.

The incident occurred just days after a Chinese fighter jet collided with a
US spy plane over the South China Sea, 65 miles from the southern island of
Hainan on April 1, sparking a stand-off over the fate of the American crew.

Immediately after the collision, China launched a propaganda campaign against
foreign military activity within the 200-mile wide "economic exclusion zone".
Nations have wide-ranging economic rights over the marine resources in such
zones, but they are not sovereign territory.

Chinese state media accused the American military of abusing international
rules on "freedom of overflight". China insisted that under these rules
foreign powers were obliged to "take account of the rights, laws, and
regulations of maritime states" when inside 200-mile limits.

Local coverage left many Chinese citizens with the impression that the
collision took place in Chinese airspace. The Taiwan Straits - which are only
70 miles wide in places - contain some of the busiest shipping lanes in the
world, and some of the most sensitive.

If China steps up aggressive "interceptions" in international sea lanes on
the mainland side of the straits, America and its allies can be expected to
resist strongly. Under the United Nations Law of the Sea Convention, all
vessels, including warships, enjoy the right of "innocent passage", even
through territorial waters.

Innocent sailings must be continuous and "expeditious", and must not involve
threats or use of force, the use or testing of weapons, intelligence
gathering, or the launching or recovery of any aircraft or military device.
Submarines should surface and show their flag.

China has long argued that warships should request permission before steaming
through its territorial waters, but America has never accepted this view.

In 1996, President Clinton sent two aircraft carrier battle groups to the
seas off Taiwan in a show of force after China staged war games to scare
voters during Taiwan's first free elections.






*COPYRIGHT NOTICE** In accordance with Title 17 U. S. C. Section 107,
any copyrighted work in this message is distributed under fair use
without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest
in receiving the included information for nonprofit research and educational
purposes only.[Ref. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml ]

Want to be on our lists?  Write at [EMAIL PROTECTED] for a menu of our lists!

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to