-Caveat Lector-
..............................................................
The truth about environmentalism: GENOCIDE!
http://www.churchofeuthanasia.org/e-sermons/humcan.html
Humans as Cancer
by A. Kent MacDougall
When a spot on a person's skin changes color, becomes tough or rough and
elevated or ulcerated, bleeds, scales, scabs over and fails to heal, it's
time to consult a doctor. For these are early signs of skin cancer.
As seen by astronauts and photographed from space by satellites, millions
of manmade patterns on the land surface of Earth resemble nothing so much
as the skin conditions of cancer patients. The transformation of the
natural contours of the land into the geometric patterns of farm fields,
the straightening of meandering rivers into canal-like channels, and the
logging of forests into checkerboard clearcuts all have their counterparts
in the loss of normal skin markings in cancer victims. Green forests
logged into brown scrub and overgrazed grasslands bleached into white
wasteland are among the changes in Earth's color. Highways, streets,
parking lots and other paved surfaces have toughened Earth's surface,
while cities have roughened it. Slag heaps and garbage dumps can be
compared to raised skin lesions. Open-pit mines, quarries and bomb
craters, including the 30 million left by US forces in Indochina, resemble
skin ulcerations. Saline seeps in inappropriately irrigated farm fields
look like scaly, festering sores. Signs of bleeding include the discharge
of human sewage, factory effluents and acid mine drainage into adjacent
waterways, and the erosion of topsoil from deforested hillsides to turn
rivers, lakes and coastal waters yellow, brown and red. The red ring
around much of Madagascar that is visible from space strikes some
observers as a symptom that the island is bleeding to death.
If skin cancer were all that ailed Earth, the planet's eventual recovery
would be less in doubt. For with the exception of malignant melanoma, skin
cancer is usually curable. But the parallels between the way cancer
progresses in the human body and humans' progressively malignant impact on
Earth are more than skin-deep. Consider:
Cancer cells proliferate rapidly and uncontrollably in the body; humans
continue to proliferate rapidly and uncontrollably in the world. Crowded
cancer cells harden into tumors; humans crowd into cities. Cancer cells
infiltrate and destroy adjacent normal tissues; urban sprawl devours open
land. Malignant tumors shed cells that migrate to distant parts of the
body and set up secondary tumors; humans have colonized just about every
habitable part of the globe. Cancer cells lose their natural appearance
and distinctive functions; humans homogenize diverse natural ecosystems
into artificial monocultures. Malignant tumors excrete enzymes and other
chemicals that adversely affect remote parts of the body; humans' motor
vehicles, power plants, factories and farms emit toxins that pollute
environments far from the point of origin.
A cancerous tumor continues to grow even as its expropriation of nutrients
and disruption of vital functions cause its host to waste away. Similarly,
human societies undermine their own long-term viability by depleting and
fouling the environment. With civilization as with cancer, initial success
begets self-defeating excess.
It's easy to dismiss the link between cancer the disease in humans and
humans as a disease on the planet as both preposterous and repulsive--or
as a mere metaphor rather than the unifying hypothesis its leading
proponent claims for it. Only a handful of limited-circulation
periodicals, including this one (see Forencich 1992/93), have granted the
concept a respectful hearing.
Accepting the humans-as-cancer concept comes easier if one also accepts
the Gaia hypothesis that the planet functions as a single living organism.
To be sure, the Earth is mostly inanimate. Its rocky, watery surface
supports only a relatively thin layer of plants, animals and other living
organisms. But so, too, is a mature tree mostly dead wood and bark, with
only its thin cambium layer and its leaves, flowers and seeds actually
alive. Yet the tree is a living organism. Earth behaves like a living
organism to the extent that the chemical composition of its rocky crust,
oceans and atmosphere has both supported and been influenced by the
biological processes of living organisms over several billion years. These
self-sustaining, self-regulating processes have kept the Earth's surface
temperature, its concentrations of salt in the oceans and oxygen in the
atmosphere, and other conditions favorable for life.
James Lovelock, who propounded the Gaia hypothesis in 1979, initially
rejected humans' cancer-like impacts as a corollary, declaring flatly:
"People are not in any way like a tumor" (Lovelock 1988, p. 177). But
before long he modified this view, observing: "Humans on the Earth behave
in some ways like a pathogenic micro-organism, or like the cells of a
tumor or neoplasm" (Lovelock 1991,p. 153).
Others have stated the connection more strongly. "If you picture Earth and
its inhabitants as a single self-sustaining organism, along the lines of
the popular Gaia concept, then we humans might ourselves be seen as
pathogenic," Jerold M. Lowenstein, professor of medicine at the University
of California, San Francisco, has written. "We are infecting the planet,
growing recklessly as cancer cells do, destroying Gaia's other specialized
cells (that is, extinguishing other species), and poisoning our air
supply....From a Gaian perspective... the main disease to be eliminated is
us" (Lowenstein 1992).
Dr. Lowenstein isn't the first physician to examine the planet as a
patient and find it afflicted with humanoid cancer. Alan Gregg pioneered
the diagnosis. As a long-time official of the Rockefeller Foundation,
responsible for recommending financial grants to improve public health and
medical education, Dr. Gregg traveled widely in the years following World
War II and observed the worldwide population boom. By 1954 he had seen
enough. In a brief paper delivered at a symposium and subsequently
published in Science, Gregg (1955) compared the world to a living organism
and the explosion in human numbers to a proliferation of cancer cells. He
sketched other parallels between cancer in humans and humans' cancer-like
impact on the world. And he expressed hope--unrealized to this day--that
"this somewhat bizarre comment on the population problem may point to a
new concept of human self-restraint."
It has fallen to a physician who is also an epidemiologist to flesh out
and fill in Gregg's sketchily drawn analysis. Warren M. Hern wrote his
Ph.D. dissertation on how the intrusion of Western civilization has
increased birth rates among Peruvian Amazon Indians. He does his bit to
keep the US birth rate down by operating an abortion clinic in Boulder,
Colorado. Hern (1990) published a major article that laid out in detail,
and buttressed with anthropological, ecological and historical evidence,
the ways in which the human species constitutes a "malignant eco-tumor."
He proposed renaming us Homo esophagus (for "the man who devours the
ecosystem"). Illustrations accompanying the article included aerial
photographs of US cities juxtaposed with look-alike photos of brain and
lung tumors.
Dr. Hern has delivered papers on the hypothesis at symposia organized by
the Population Association of America, the American Association for the
Advancement of Science, and the American Public Health Association. Two
papers have subsequently been published (Hern 1993a, 1993b). But in
general the scientific community doesn't take his hypothesis seriously,
preferring to see it as a mere metaphor or analogy. Indeed, it has evoked
hostility in some quarters. When Hern presented the hypothesis at the
International Conference on Population and Development in Cairo in 1994,
listeners reacted angrily, with one threatening, "Are you ready to die?" A
Denver radio talk show host called Dr. Hern an "ecoquack" and a
"fellow-in-good-standing of the Sky-Is-Falling School."
Such disparagement can be seen as yet another parallel between cancer the
scourge in humans and humans as a carcinogenic scourge on the world. For
just as Warren Hern encounters indifference, denial and downright
hostility to his views, until recently American doctors routinely kept
their cancer patients in the dark about the nature of their illness. The
aim was to spare patients the shock, fear, anger and depression that the
bad news commonly evokes. Families were reluctant to admit that a relative
had died of cancer, and newspaper obituaries referred euphemistically to
the cause of a death from cancer as "a long illness." In Japan, cancer
remains a taboo topic. Public opinion polls indicate that people would
rather not know if they have cancer and doctors would rather not tell
them. When Emperor Hirohito was dying of cancer of the duodenum, his
doctors lied, telling both him and the public that he had "chronic
pancreatitis" (Sanger 1989).
In the United States, even some environmentally enlightened analysts
remain in denial when it comes to the humans-as-a-planetary-cancer
hypothesis. Christopher D. Stone, a law professor at the University of
Southern California and son of the late leftist journalist I. F. Stone,
authored an influential essay on environmental law, Should Trees Have
Standing? Toward Legal Rights for Natural Objects. But in his latest book
Stone (1993, p.4) casts doubt on the proposition that "the earth has
cancer, and the cancer is man." "The interdependency of the earth's parts
does not amount to the interdependency of organs within a true organism,"
he notes. "The earth as a whole, including its life web, is not as
fragile...the Gaian relationships are not so finely, so precariously
tuned."
Even deep ecologists acknowledge that Earth is qualitatively different
from a true organism, that its legitimate status as a superecosystem falls
short of qualifying it as a superorganism. Frank Forencich, who argued in
"Homo Carcinomicus: A Look at Planetary Oncology" (Forencich 1992/93) that
"the parallels between neoplastic growth and human population are
astonishing," concedes that even a nuclear winter wouldn't completely
destroy the living biosphere, much less the inanimate lithosphere,
hydrosphere and atmosphere. "We can't kill the host," he says.
"Civilization will break up before the biosphere goes" (Forencich 1993).
Still another objection is that any generalization about cancer is suspect
because cancer is not a single disease, but rather a group of more than
100 diseases that differ as to cause and characteristics. Some
cancers--breast cancer, for instance--typically grow rapidly and spread
aggressively. Others, such as cancers of the small intestine, usually grow
slowly. Prostate cancer often grows so slowly that it causes no problem.
"It's completely possible for an organism to have cancer cells for its
entire lifetime and suffer no ill effects" (Garrett 1988, p.43).
The lack of a perfect correspondence between cancer the disease in humans
and humans' cancer-like effects on the Earth invalidates the
humans-as-cancer concept for some observers. But Warren Hern insists
humans-as-cancer is a hypothesis because it is subject to verification or
refutation and because it is useful as a basis for further investigation.
Frank Forencich, in contrast, is content to consider the concept a
metaphor. "That humans are like cancer is indisputable," he says. "But
humans are not cancer itself."
Whether as metaphor or hypothesis, the proposition that humans have been
acting like malignant cancer cells deserves to be taken seriously. The
proposition offers a unifying interpretation of such seemingly unconnected
phenomena as the destruction of ecosystems, the decay of inner cities and
the globalization of Western commodity culture. It provides a valuable
macrocosmic perspective on human impacts, as well as a revealing historic
perspective in tracing humans' carcinogenic propensities back to the
earliest times.
The progenitors of modern humans exhibited one of cancer cells' most
significant characteristics, loss of adhesion, one to two million years
ago. Because cancer cells are attached more loosely to one another than
normal cells are, they separate easily, move randomly and invade tissues
beyond those from which they were derived. Our direct ancestors, Homo
erectus, demonstrated this trait in migrating out of Africa. Living in
small mobile groups, these foragers/scavengers/hunters spread across Asia
and Europe. The next hominid species in the evolutionary line, Homo
sapiens, extended the dispersal into previously uninhabitable northern
forests and tundra. Their successors, anatomically modern Homo sapiens
sapiens, have spread to every continent and major ice-free island. With
the aid of clothing, shelter, technology and imported supplies, they now
occupy forests, wetlands, deserts, tundra and other areas formerly
considered too wet, too dry, too cold, or too remote for human habitation.
Humans now occupy, or have altered and exploited, two-thirds to
nine-tenths (estimates vary) of the planet's land surface. It seems only a
matter of time before they take over all the remaining "empty" spaces.
Humans' ongoing expropriation of the planet has proceeded apace with the
eruption of human numbers; and the eruption of human numbers has features
in common with the proliferation of cancer cells. In a healthy body,
genetic controls enable a large number of individual cells to live
together harmoniously as a single organism. Genetic switches signal normal
cells when it is time to divide and multiply, and when it is time to break
apart and be absorbed by neighboring cells. When the genetic switches are
damaged, as by chemicals, radiation, or viruses, they can get locked in
the "on" position. This turns normal cells into malignant cells that
divide and multiply in disregard of the health of the entire organism.
When humans lived in semi-nomadic bands in harmony with an environment
they did not dominate, they limited their numbers so as not to exceed the
supply of food they could gather, scavenge, and hunt. Nor did they produce
more young than they could carry between seasonal camps. Their
contraceptive measures included coitus interruptus (withdrawal),
pessaries, and prolonged breastfeeding to depress the hormones that
trigger ovulation. When these methods failed, they resorted to abortion
and infanticide. Like normal cells in a healthy body, hunter-gatherers
seemed to know when to stop growing.
However, technological and cultural contaminants upset this delicate
natural balance, permitting humans to multiply beyond numbers compatible
with the harmonious health of the global ecosystem. The first and still
the foremost contaminant was fire. By 400,000 years ago--perhaps even
earlier--hunter-gatherers had learned to control and use fire. Thus began
the transformation of humans from just another large mammal in competition
with other fierce predators into the undisputed overlord of all species,
plant and animal. Addiction to combustion has defined human existence ever
since, and has escalated into the current orgy of fossil-fuel burning with
the potential of overheating Gaia and jeopardizing the existence of all
her inhabitants.
Fire was generally benign when used by hunter-gatherers to thin dense
forests into more open and park-like landscapes supporting more game. But
the increase in food supply that more effective hunting and the cooking of
tough meat and fibrous vegetable matter made possible swelled
hunter-gatherer populations. As humans proliferated and spread out,
overhunted and overgathered, large game and suitable wild foods became
less abundant. This made hunting and gathering less efficient, leaving
horticulture, which previously hadn't been worth the extra effort, as the
only viable alternative.
Clearing forests to farm began some 10,000 years ago in Asia Minor. About
2000 years later, shifting horticulturists began slashing and burning
their way northwestward across Europe. They overwhelmed and pushed aside
less numerous hunter-gatherers before giving way in turn to
agriculturalists whose plow cultivation of permanent fields permitted more
intensive food production and denser populations.
Agriculture condemned peasants to a short, harsh life of monotonous toil,
an inadequate diet, the constant threat of crop failure and starvation and
exposure to virulent contagious diseases. It fostered social
stratification and sexual inequality, cruel treatment of animals,
despotism and warfare. And it encouraged further cancer-like encroachment
on wilderness to feed increased populations and to replace fields and
pastures eroded and depleted of soil fertility by overcropping and
overgrazing. The elites that came to dominate sedentary agrarian societies
caused still more woodland to be cleared and marshland to be drained to
maximize production they could expropriate for their own use. This
economic surplus, in turn, helped support an increasing concentration of
people in river valleys, along seacoasts, and in cities.
The massing of humans into cities is all too similar to the way crowded
cancer cells harden into tumors. Whereas normal cells in a tissue culture
stop reproducing when they come in contact with other cells, cancer cells
continue to divide and pile up on top of one another, forming clumps.
Normal cells display contact inhibition, growing only to the limits of
their defined space and then stopping. Cancer cells never know when to
quit.
Likewise, human populations grow even under extremely crowded conditions.
The very essence of civilization is the concentration of people in cities.
As scattered farming villages evolved into towns, and some towns became
trading, manufacturing, ceremonial and administrative centers, the city
was born. Fed by grain grown in the provinces and served by slaves seized
there, the administrative centers of empires grew large; Rome may have
reached one million people at its height in 100 C.E. Yet not until
industrialization and the extensive exploitation of distant resources
after 1800 did cities really begin getting out of hand, and in 1900, still
only one in ten people lived in cities. Half will in 2000, with 20
metropolitan areas expected to have 10 million or more people each.
The propensity of modern cities to spread out over the
countryside--absorbing villages, destroying farm fields, filling in open
land, and creating vast new agglomerations--was noted early in this
century by the Scottish garden-city planner Patrick Geddes. Geddes (1915)
identified half a dozen such "conurbations" in the making in Britain, and
he foresaw the approach of a 500-mile megalopolis along the northern
Atlantic seaboard in the United States. Geddes compared urban sprawl to an
amoeba, but it fell to his American protege Lewis Mumford to liken
disorderly, shapeless, uncoordinated urban expansion to a malignant tumor,
observing that "the city continues to grow inorganically, indeed
cancerously, by a continuous breaking down of old tissues, and an
overgrowth of formless new tissue" (Mumford 1961, p. 543).
A malignant tumor develops its own blood vessels as it grows. Similarly,
cities vascularize with aqueducts, electric power lines, highways,
railroads, canals and other conduits. A tumor uses its circulation network
to pirate nutrients from the body. Similarly, cities parasitically tap the
countryside and beyond to bring in food, fuel, water, and other supplies.
However, just as a tumor eventually outgrows its blood supply, causing a
part of it, often at the center, to die, inner city neighborhoods and even
older suburbs often atrophy. Alan Gregg (1955) noted this parallel 40
years ago, observing "how nearly the slums of our great cities resemble
the necrosis of tumors."
Humans are increasingly concentrated along seacoasts. Sixty percent of the
world's people now live within 100 kilometers of a seacoast. In Australia,
one of the world's most highly urbanized nations, nine of every ten people
live along the coast. The boom in international trade, from which coastal
areas receive a disproportionate share of the benefits, helps explain the
worldwide trend; but the pattern goes back thousands of years and
parallels yet another carcinogenic process: metastasis.
In metastasis, a tumor sheds cancer cells that then migrate to distant
sites of the body and set up secondary growths. The medium for the
migration of the cells is the blood and lymphatic systems. In the ancient
world of the Mediterranean, another fluid--water--facilitated the
migration of people and goods. The Phoenicians, Greeks, Carthagenians and
Romans all took advantage of the relative ease of travel and transport by
water to establish colonies all around the Mediterranean. At the height of
the Roman Empire, no fewer than 500 settlements flourished along the
African coast from Morocco to Egypt.
Just as secondary tumors in the human body destroy the tissues and organs
they invade, colonizers of the ancient Mediterranean devastated the
fertile but fragile ecosystems of the coastal regions they colonized. They
logged coastal forests for ship timbers and building materials, to provide
charcoal to fire bricks and pottery and smelt mineral ores, and to create
farm fields and pastures. Overcropping, fires, sheep and goats prevented
regeneration. Intense winter rains washed the thin, easily eroded soil
down hillsides into coastal plains to smother farm fields, choke the
mouths of rivers, create malarial marshes, bury port cities and strand
many of them miles from the sea. The slopes, left barren, have not
recovered to this day.
The voraciousness of secondary tumors as they invade and consume tissues
and organs has its counterpart in the orgies of destruction that states
and especially empires have engaged in for 5000 years. In many cases, the
destruction has exceeded what was in the destroyer's own self-interest.
Many invaders routinely obliterated the cities they conquered, massacred
their inhabitants, and destroyed their fields and flocks instead of just
taking them over. Carpet bombing of cities and the mass slaughter of their
civilian noncombatant populations during World War II constitute the
modern equivalent. Ancient Romans ransacked their empire for bears, lions,
leopards, elephants, rhinos, hippos and other live animals to be tormented
and killed in public arenas until there were no more to be found. European
invaders of North America and Siberia did in the fur trade from which they
so hugely profited by the self-defeating overkill of fur-bearing animals.
Human destruction of ecosystems has increased relentlessly since
industrialization. The annihilation of 60 million bison on the North
American Great Plains was made possible by the intrusion of railroads and
the invention of the repeating rifle. The reckless exploitation of whales
was speeded by the invention of the explosive harpoon, cannon-winch and
engine-driven ship. Enormous nets towed by today's factory trawlers permit
oceans to be strip-mined for fish--and any other creature unlucky enough
to become ensnared in these curtains of death. Tractors and other modern
farm machinery alternately compact and pulverize topsoil, increasing its
vulnerability to erosive winds and rains. Chain saws and bulldozers level
forests faster than axes and hand saws ever could. Dynamite and drag line
excavators permit strip mining on a scale hitherto unimaginable,
decapitating mountains, turning landscapes into moon craters, and
rendering islands such as phosphate-rich Nauru in the South Pacific all
but uninhabitable. Boring holes in the earth to get at minerals, of
course, resembles the way cancer bores holes in muscle and bone. As Peter
Russell (1983, p.33) has observed, "Technological civilization really does
look like a rampant malignant growth blindly devouring its own ancestral
host in a selfish act of consumption."
Just as a fast-growing tumor steals nutrients from healthy parts of the
body to meet its high energy demands, industrial civilization usurps the
resources of healthy ecosystems that their natural plant and animal
inhabitants depend on for survival. In 1850, humans and their livestock
accounted for 5 percent of the total weight of all terrestrial animal
life. Today, that portion exceeds 20 percent, and by the year 2030 it
could reach 40 percent (Westing 1990, pp. 110-111).
"Never before in the history of the earth has a single species been so
widely distributed and monopolized such a large fraction of the energetic
resources. An ever diminishing remainder of these limited resources is now
being divided among millions of other species. The consequences are
predictable: contraction of geographic ranges, reduction of population
sizes, and increased probability of extinction for most wild species;
expansion of ranges and increased populations of the few species that
benefit from human activity; and loss of biological diversity at all
scales from local to global" (Brown and Maurer 1989).
Decline in diversity is common to both cancer and civilization. In both
cases, heterogeneity gives way to homogeneity, complexity to
simplification. Malignant cells fail to develop into specialized cells of
the tissues from which they derive. Instead, "undifferentiated, highly
malignant cells tend to resemble one another and fetal tissues more than
their adult normal counterpart cells" (Ruddon 1987, p.230).
De-differentiation in human societies is at least as old as agriculture
and animal husbandry. Farmers have been replacing diverse species of
native plants with pure stands of domesticated crops for thousands of
years. Instead of the thousands of kinds of plants that pre-agricultural
peoples gathered for food, just seven staples--wheat, rice, maize,
potatoes, barley, sweet potato and cassava--now supply three-quarters of
the caloric content of all the world's food crops. The world's astonishing
abundance and variety of wildlife is going fast, with many species soon to
be seen only in zoos and game parks, their places taken by cattle, sheep,
goats, pigs and other domesticated livestock.
Despite their value in providing wildlife habitat, modulating flood waters
and filtering out pollutants, more than half of the world's swamps,
marshes, bogs, seasonal flood plains and other wetlands have been drained,
dredged, filled in, built on or otherwise destroyed. Temperate forests
dominated by trees of many species and of all ages are giving way to
single species, same-aged conifer plantations supporting far fewer birds
and other wildlife. And the tropical forests that harbor more than half of
all species on Earth are being mowed down faster than their bewildering
biodiversity can be identified, leading some experts to warn that we are
causing the greatest mass extinction since the disappearance of the
dinosaurs 65 million years ago.
The tendency of civilizations to homogenize and impoverish ecosystems is
nowhere clearer than in urban areas. Major cities are becoming
indistinguishable from one another in appearance and undifferentiated in
function. Central business districts so resemble one another that
travelers can be forgiven for forgetting whether they are in Boston,
Brussels or Bombay. Shanty cities in poor countries look alike, as do
suburbs in rich countries.
As Lewis Mumford pointed out more than 30 years ago, the archetypal
suburban refuge in the United States consists of "a multitude of uniform,
unidentifiable houses, lined up inflexibly, at uniform distances, on
uniform roads, in a treeless communal waste, inhabited by people of the
same class, the same income, the same age group, witnessing the same
television performances, eating the same tasteless pre-fabricated foods,
from the same freezers, conforming in every outward and inward respect to
a common mold, manufactured in the central metropolis. Thus the ultimate
effect of the suburban escape in our time is, ironically, a low-grade
uniform environment from which escape is impossible" (Mumford 1961,
p.486).
Globalization of the economy is enclosing the entire world in a single
market for machine-made goods that are increasingly standardized whatever
their country of origin. Western material values and capitalist commodity
culture, led by American television, movies, music, street fashions and
fast food, are dominant internationally. Local and regional individuality,
along with indigenous cultures, languages and world views, are fading
fast.
The decline of natural and cultural diversity is as threatening to the
planet as undifferentiated cells are to the cancer patient. Whereas a
well-differentiated prostate cancer tends to grow slowly, remain localized
and cause no symptoms, a poorly differentiated one often spreads
aggressively. Similarly, traditional farmers who keep weeds, pests and
plant diseases in check by rotating crops, fertilizing naturally, and
maintaining the tilth of the soil don't threaten Earth's health the way
single-crop plantations relying on pesticides, synthetic fertilizers and
heavy machinery do. Unfortunately, monocultural agriculture is becoming
the norm on every continent.
Hemorrhaging is still another symptom of the carcinogenic process. The
first sign of cancer is often spontaneous bleeding from a body orifice,
discharge from a nipple, or an oozing sore. Vomiting can warn of a brain
tumor or leukemia. Signs that Earth, too, has cancer abound. Cities vomit
human sewage and industrial wastes into adjacent waterways. Mines and slag
heaps ooze mercury, arsenic, cyanide and sulfuric acid. Wells gush,
pipelines leak and tankers spill oil. Farm fields discharge topsoil,
fertilizers, pesticides and salts to silt up and poison rivers and
estuaries. Cattle feedlots add manure. Most serious of all, deforested,
eroded hillsides hemorrhage floods of mud.
Fever is another symptom of cancer in both humans and the planet. Cancer
patients become fevered because of increased susceptibility to infection
caused by a depressed immune system. Chemotherapy and irradiation can also
cause fever, as can temperature-elevating substances released by a
malignant tumor. Global warming is the planetary counterpart. Waste
products released by industry and motor vehicles, deforestation and other
feverish human activities pump inordinate quantities of carbon dioxide,
nitrous oxide, methane, chlorofluorocarbons and other greenhouse gases
into the atmosphere where they trap heat and raise temperatures.
Wasting, or cachexia, is still another sign of advanced cancer. A cancer
patient becomes fatigued and weak, losing both appetite and weight as the
tumor releases toxic hormones and makes metabolic demands on the body.
"Many cancer patients die not of cancer itself, but of progressive
malnutrition" (Rosenbaum 1988, p.264). The planetary counterpart includes
loss of forests, fisheries, biodiversity, soil, groundwater and biomass.
It's not in a tumor's self-interest to steal nutrients to the point where
the host starves to death, for this kills the tumor as well. Yet tumors
commonly continue growing until the victim wastes away. A malignant tumor
usually goes undetected until the number of cells in it has doubled at
least 30 times from a single cell. The number of humans on Earth has
already doubled 32 times, reaching that mark in 1978 when world population
passed 4.3 billion. Thirty-seven to 40 doublings, at which point a tumor
weighs about one kilogram, are usually fatal (Tannock 1992, pp. 157, 175).
Like a smoker who exaggerates the pain of withdrawal and persists because
the carcinogenic consequences of his bad habit don't show up for 20 or 30
years, governments generally avoid the painful adjustments needed to
prevent social, economic and environmental disasters in the making.
"Governments with limited tenure, in the developing as well as in the
developed countries, generally respond to immediate political priorities;
they tend to defer addressing the longer term issues, preferring instead
to provide subsidies, initiate studies, or make piecemeal modifications of
policy" (Hillel 1991, p. 273). So it usually takes a crisis, often a
catastrophe, before even the most commonsensical action is taken--and then
it is often too late to avoid irreversible ecological damage.
Is the prognosis for the planet as grim as it is for a patient with
advanced cancer? Or will infinitely clever but infrequently wise Homo
sapiens alter geocidal behaviors in time to avoid global ruin? Even the
most pessimistic doomsayers concede that humans have the capacity to
arrest Gaia's deteriorating condition. Cancer cells can't think, but
humans can. Cancer cells can't know the full extent of the harm they're
doing to the organism of which they are a part, whereas humans have the
capacity for planetary awareness. Cancer cells can't consciously modify
their behavior to spare their host's life and prolong their own, whereas
humans can adjust, adapt, innovate, pull back, change course.
Gaia's future, and humans' with it, depends on their doing so.
REFERENCES
Brown, James H. and Brian A. Maurer 1989. Macroecology: The Division of
Food and Space Among Species on Continents. Science 243:1145-1150.
Forencich, Frank. 1992/93. Homo Carcinomicus: A Look at Planetary
Oncology. Wild Earth 2(4): 72-74.
Forencich, Frank. 1993. Personal communication.
Garrett, Laurie. 1988. The Biology of Cancer. In Mark Renneker, editor,
Understanding Cancer, third edition. Bull Publishing, Palo Alto, CA.
Geddes, Patrick 1915. Reprinted in 1968. Cities in Evolution: An
Introduction to the Town Planning Movement and to the Study of Civics.
Ernest Benn, London.
Gregg, Alan. 1955. A Medical Aspect of the Population Problem. Science
121(3,150): 681-682.
Hern, Warren M. 1990. Why Are There So Many of Us? Description and
Diagnosis of a Planetary Ecopathological Process. Population and
Environment 12(1): 9-39.
Hern, Warren M. 1993a. Is Human Culture Carcinogenic for Uncontrolled
Population Growth and Ecological Destruction? BioScience 43(11): 768-773.
Hern, Warren M. 1993b . Has the Human Species Become a Cancer on the
Planet? A Theoretical View of Population Growth as a Sign of Pathology.
Current World Leaders 36(6): 1089-1124.
Hillel, Daniel J. 1991. Out of the Earth: Civilization and the Life of the
Soil. Free Press, New York.
Lovelock, James. 1988. The Ages of Gaia: A Biography of Our Living Earth.
W. W. Norton, New York.
Lovelock, James. 1991. Healing Gaia: Practical Medicine for the Planet.
Harmony Books, New York.
Lowenstein, Jerold M. 1992. Can We Wipe Out Disease? Discover November
1992: 120-125.
Mumford, Lewis. 1961. The City in History: Its Origins, Its
Transformations, and Its Prospects. Harcourt, Brace & World, New York.
Rosenbaum, Ernest. 1988. In Mark Renneker, editor Understanding Cancer,
third edition. Bull Publishing, Palo Alto, CA.
Ruddon, Raymond W. 1987. Cancer Biology, second edition. Oxford University
Press, New York.
Russell, Peter 1983. The Global Brain. J. P. Tarcher, Los Angeles.
Sanger, David E. 1989. Tokyo Journal: A Fear of Cancer Means No Telling.
New York Times Jan. 20, 1989.
Stone, Christopher D. 1993. The Gnat Is Older Than Man: Global Environment
and Human Agenda. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.
Tannock, Ian F. 1992. In Tannock and Richard P. Hill, editors, The Basic
Science of Oncology, second edition. McGraw-Hill, New York.
Westing, Arthur H. 1990. In Nicholas Polunin and John H. Burnett, editors,
Maintenance of the Biosphere: Proceedings of the Third International
Conference on Environmental Future. St. Martin's, New York.
A. Kent MacDougall (911 Oxford St., Berkeley CA 94707) is professor
emeritus of journalism at the University of California, Berkeley. He
completed his 25-year newspaper reporting career in 1987 with a
24,000-word series of articles for the Los Angeles Times on deforestation
around the world and through the ages. The series won the Forest History
Society's John M. Collier Award for Forest History Journalism.
http://www.churchofeuthanasia.org/e-sermons/humcan.html
***********************************
Lloyd Miller, Research Director for A-albionic Research (POB 20273,
Ferndale, MI 48220), a ruling class/conspiracy research resource for the
entire political-ideological spectrum. On-Line Journal, book sales,
rare/out-of-print searches, New Paradigms Discussion List, Weekly Up-date
Lists & E-text Archive of research, intelligence, catalogs, & resources.
To Discuss Ideas:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://msen.com/~lloyd/
For Ordering Info & Free Catalog:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://a-albionic.com/formaddress.html
For Discussion List:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
text in body: subscribe prj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
**FREE RARE BOOK SEARCH: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> **
Explore Our Archive: <http://a-albionic.com/a-albionic.html>
Every Diet Has Failed! What Can I do?
Click Below to "Ask Dr. Kathleen"!
http://www.radiantdiet.com/cgi-bin/slim/deliver.cgi?ask-1364
***********************************
<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
<A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
<A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
