-Caveat Lector-
Could one of you people out there who reject evolution please explain to
me why evolution and intelligent design are mutually preclusive?
It doesn't really follow that all that oppose darwins evolution should
necessarily
be fundamentally christian.
However, for me, my picture of evolution is more complex and more scientific
than
religious belief. [although I am Christian too]
It is based upon the research into Chaos theory, Complexity and Emergence.
Order Out of Chaos the 33rd degree masons tell us - and so does 10,000BC
Hindu
sanskrit and so does the the modern research at santa fe - www.santafe.edu
Its long been known eg. the compilation of darwin refutations by Richard
Milton
in his book THE FACTS OF LIFE, and also by the paleontologists of china -
who have a fossil record that sees darwin off by all accounts - that Charles
darwin
was onto some basic idea some of which worked - but couldn't really account
for
everything.
It suited 20th century politics to latch onto darwin - so-called social
darwinism -
an easy idea like survival of the fittest - the long slow 'Climbing Mount
Improbable'
ed. Richard dawkins - but the real and true science behind such theories is
actually
suppressed - for various reasons.
1. Catastrophism - the sudden revolution of the world as documented by
Beaumont and Velikovsky [who plagiarised beaumont] has it that the
established
order can disappear overnight - absolute chaos and anarchy as a social
paradigm -
and the fittest don't get a fair chance to bully anyone because they simply
don't
have the time to get it together amongst the sudden overturning of
mountains -
eg. there are fossilised trees still standing upright - none of the slowly
falling down
and gradually becoming coal stuff - these trees were suddenly deluged.
The implications of catastrophism for the social engineers were scary - for
the religion
of irrationality and chaos would emerge - unless the science of chaos could
be alowed to
emerge. Champions might suddenly emerge - hope might spring up etc etc
What was needed was the paradigm of maintained steady control - so if there
was to be chaos it had to have a scientific basis - then [perhaps buried]
Enter the santa fe institute where research by Kauffman, langton on the
spontaneous
organisation of complex systems into structures - soon illustrated that
Chaos played
an important role - ie. the mathematics of chaos - in structure.
Next came the paris expose of Newton - and his theory of planetary motion
bit the dust
when it was found that the planets didn't proceed in an orderly manner -
they only
APPEARED to do so - and the closer we looked the more chaos mathematics
explained.
The Cambridge Biologist Brain Goodwin discovered the taboo, the refutation
of smooth talking
pope of the rational - mr memetics - Richard Dawkins - Dawkins went to great
lengths to
ossify Darwin in concrete with his Survical of Fit thoughts and his book on
the gradual
evolution of the complexities of the eye over billions of years -
What blew Dawkins out of the water was that Goodwin could demonstrate that
the eye
could emerge quickly to fulfill the need and disappear again when there was
none -
and Goodwin predicted that an eye may evolve and devolve several times over
the course
of evolution.
Yes there was structure, yes there were mechanics but the descriptions were
never simple -
never as simple as darwin or Newton had made out. There were Contextual
factors and
other processes to be taken into account.
This idea of context does not fit at all into the world view of scientific
reductionism,
so the great new sciences that came from Santa Fe went virtually anonymous
by the end
of the 1990's - the bandwagon of stock market predictions and genius grants
ended.
To all intents and purposes - the ingredients of the cosmos could
spontaneously organise
themselves into progressively more complex systems. That is mechanistic, but
the mechanism
is the natural law called Emergence - ie. masons - ordo ab chaos. It is old
knowledge
is the truth.
They feed us the terror of darwins predator instead - the ideologies of
dominance.
Not for us the simple idea that the old order can overturn in a flash - no
hope for us.
Chaos mathematics, emergence, Structure, demergence/entropy - one big happy
equilibrium - divine providence - a playground
This does not preclude God either - nor exclude dualism, polarity, good and
evil,
nor does it disprove soul or Christ - but provides a material basis of the
Universe in
which our souls have incarnated. The rights to which we have yet to fully
establish.
andrew hennessey
<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
<A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
<A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
