A tribunal for Israel 

Paul Foot
Tuesday August 7, 2001
The Guardian

What is the legal and moral justification for the so-called 
international war crimes tribunals? I've been trying to get an answer 
to this question since I, as, I suspect, many other people, was under 
the illusion that the tribunals were set up to punish war criminals 
everywhere. Not so, however. These tribunals have been set up by 
resolutions of the UN security council to punish crimes in only two 
areas in the world so far - the former Yugoslavia (for which a 
tribunal was set up in 1993) and Rwanda (1994). 

A UN press release issued last November quoted the president of both 
tribunals, Carla Del Ponte, complaining that the Yugoslav 
tribunal's "historical credibility" was being "undermined" by "forced 
inaction on what had happened in Kosovo since June 1999"; and that 
the tribunal was still "faced with difficulties, related primarily to 
the number of accused who remain at large". 

Somehow she managed to avoid any mention of what seems to me much 
more serious difficulties which undermine the tribunals' historic 
credibility. These arise from the tribunals' limited scope, which 
leave them open to the charge that they are concerned only with war 
crimes committed in areas convenient to US foreign policy; and that 
the whole paraphernalia of courts and prosecutors set up by the UN 
security council represents yet another arm of the US state 
department, which effectively controls the security council. 

If the tribunals, judges, prosecutors etc want to be taken seriously 
as purveyors of an international rule of law, then surely their writ 
should run into all areas where the laws they claim to defend are 
flouted? 

The most shocking example of the tribunals' impotence is the state of 
Israel. The Israeli government continues to behave in the most 
flagrant contempt not only of the UN, seizing tracts of territory and 
exploiting and enslaving its people, but also of the most basic laws 
and conventions covered by the statute of the international war 
crimes tribunals and written into international law by security 
council resolutions. 

These give the tribunals power to prosecute persons "committing or 
ordering to be committed grave breaches of the Geneva conventions" 
including: a) wilful killing; b) torture or inhuman treatment; c) 
wilfully causing great suffering or serious injury to body or health; 
and d) extensive destruction and appropriation of property not 
justified by military necessity and carried out unlawfully and 
wantonly. 

Every one of these provisions is broken daily, and universally seen 
to be broken daily, by Israeli forces under the orders of its 
government and its prime minister, Ariel Sharon. That government 
brazenly admits to a policy of assassinations (so tactfully 
downgraded by the BBC to "targeted killings"). 

If there is any doubt about this, consider article 3 of the 
tribunals' statute, which refers to the "wanton destruction of cities 
towns and villages or devastation not justified by military 
necessity", or article 5, that empowers the tribunal to prosecute 
persons responsible for crimes against humanity, including murder, if 
it is "committed in armed conflict and directed against any civilian 
population". 

There is no need for potential prosecutors to delve into Sharon's 
gruesome history - such as his role in the slaughter of over 60 
Palestinians in the village of Qibya in 1953, documented by Israeli 
historian Benny Morris; or his responsibility as Israeli defence 
minister for the butchery of at least 2,000 people in the Lebanese 
refugee camps of Sabra and Shatila in 1982 (the climax of Sharon's 
invasion of Lebanon, denounced as illegal by the UN and even by 
Margaret Thatcher). 

No need for any retrospective legislation to deal with this man. No 
need, even, to question the double standards of our own Tony Blair, 
who breaks off from his earnest soliloquy praising the arrest by the 
tribunal of Slobodan Milosevic (already a prisoner in his own 
country), to beam with welcome while shaking the bloodstained hand of 
Sharon. 

The current daily behaviour of Israeli troops is quite enough to 
justify extending the scope of the war crimes tribunals to the 
government of Israel and its tyrannical behaviour in the territories 
it has stolen from the Palestinian people and planted with its own 
fanatical colonists. Indeed, the daily breach by Israeli troops of 
the tribunals' own statute poses a challenge to the tribunals' 
judges, prosecutors and administrators. 

As long as they remain powerless to deal with the crimes of Israel, 
as long as Sharon is kept out of their dock, the tribunals will be 
seen to be excluded from sitting in judgment over the crimes of the 
US or any of its client states, and the tribunals' trials, 
deliberations and verdicts will be absolutely worthless. 

Guardian Unlimited © Guardian Newspapers Limited 2001 

Reply via email to