-Caveat Lector-

http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2001/12/19/15257.shtml

WJPBR Email News List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Peace at any cost is a Prelude to War!

Gun Ownership – Are We Fit to Be Free?
Phil Brennan
Wednesday, Dec. 19, 2001
It happened again. Some poor guy caught in a love triangle he couldn't handle
went berserk and shot a number of co-workers before killing himself.
These things are happening more and more frequently, the list of victims
continues to grow, and much of the blame for the deaths and woundings can be
laid squarely at the doors of the nation's rabid anti-gun zealots.

If that sounds harsh, keep in mind the fact that in every single instance of
mass shootings, the victims were all defenseless, largely because anti-gun
laws and irrational anti-gun sentiments kept victims and bystanders from
having weapons that could have been used to stop the killers in their tracks.

That could have been true at Columbine High School where, had just one
teacher had a concealed handgun to protect his students, the killing spree
could have been ended and the list of victims sharply diminished.

In every single case, by the time police arrived on the scene the damage had
been done, dramatically underscoring the fact that Americans cannot rely on
the police to protect them in such circumstances. As a result, laws banning
or prohibitively restricting citizen gun ownership are putting Americans at
the mercy of murderous crackpots and felons.

Had pilots on the three hijacked planes on Black Tuesday been armed, there is
every chance that the twin towers at the World Trade center would still be
standing, the Pentagon would be intact, and thousands of innocent victims
would still be among us, alive to celebrate Christmas with their loved ones.

That they aren't is largely the fault of the fascistic anti-gun fanatics who
have used dishonest statistics and outright lies to blame firearms, and not
those who criminally use them, in order to create a national distaste for
firearms.

Gun Control Studies

A February 2000 study by acclaimed researchers John R. Lott Jr. and William
M. Landes concludes that "the only policy factor to influence multiple victim
public shootings is the passage of concealed handgun laws."

The study conclusively shows that such crime deterrents as more police and
wider use of the death penalty tend to curb "normal" instances of murder.
They do nothing, however, to prevent such school shooting tragedies as have
occurred in a number of the nation's public schools since 1997.

To support their insistence that the availability of guns in or near public
schools prevented more death and injury, Lott and Landes cited a number of
examples, including the following:

In the Pearl, Miss., shooting, an assistant principal retrieved his gun from
his office and used it to physically immobilize the shooter before he caused
additional harm.

In an Edinboro, Penn., shooting, which left one teacher dead, "a shotgun
pointed at the offender while he was reloading his gun prevented additional
harm. The police did not arrive for another 10 minutes" after the assailant
was apprehended by school staff.

According to Lott, far and away the best-informed scholar on the subject, "in
the U.S., the states with the highest gun ownership rates have by far the
lowest violent crime rates. And similarly, over time, states with the largest
increases in gun ownership have experienced the biggest drops in violent
crime.

"Research by Jeff Miron at Boston University, examining homicide rates across
44 countries, found that countries with the strictest gun control laws also
tended to have the highest homicide rates," Lott wrote.

News reports in Britain showed how crimes with guns have risen 40 percent
since handguns were banned in 1997. Police are extremely important in
stopping crime, but almost always arrive on the scene after the crime occurs.
Passive behavior is much more likely to result in serious injury or death
than using a gun to defend oneself. The only serious research on this issue
has been conducted in the United States.

"The National Crime Victimization Report, done by the U.S. Department of
Justice, indicates consistently that women who behave passively are 2.5 times
more likely to be seriously injured than women who defend themselves with a
gun. It is the physically weakest people (women and the elderly) who benefit
the most from having a gun.

"Criminals, overwhelmingly young males, like to attack the targets that will
give them the least trouble. A gun represents a great equalizer. Defensive
gun uses are almost completely ignored by the media, but Americans use guns
defensively about two million times a year, five times more often than guns
are used to commit crimes."

Media's Role

Lott takes aim at the media, pointing the finger of blame for the
disinformation that abounds about gun ownership directly at those who report
the news.

"No one would ever learn this by simply watching the news. In part this
disregard by the media might arise because an innocent person's murder is
more newsworthy than when a victim brandishes a gun and an attacker runs away
with no crime committed.

"Unlike the crimes that are avoided, bad events provide emotionally gripping
pictures. But covering only the bad events creates the impression that guns
only cost lives. Even the rare local media coverage of defensive gun use
seldom involves more than very brief stories. News worthiness also dictates
that these stories are not the typical examples of self-defense, but the rare
instances where the attacker is shot. In fact, in up to 98 percent of the
cases, simply brandishing a gun is sufficient to stop a crime.

"Fewer than one out of 1,000 defensive gun uses results in the attacker's
death. Worldwide we hear about crimes like the public-school shootings, as we
should, but we never even hear locally about the many more lives saved. Since
the well-known public shootings started in the fall of 1997, 32 students and
four teachers have been killed in any type of shooting at elementary or
secondary schools, an annual rate of one death per 4 million students. This
includes deaths from gang fights, robberies, accidents, as well as attacks
such as the one at Columbine.

"But some sense of proportion is needed. During that same period, 53 students
died playing high school football."

Shall we ban high school football?

Concealed-Carry Laws and Crime Reduction

Noting that he analyzed the FBI's crime statistics for all U.S. counties by
year from 1977 to 1996 as well as extensive cross-county information on
accidental gun deaths and suicides, Lott explained that his study examined
states that adopted so-called "objective" or shall-issue concealed handgun
laws. Thirty-one states, he wrote, "now have shall-issue laws, while another
12 permit citizens to carry guns if they can demonstrate a need to public
officials."

The findings of the study, he said, were dramatic. The more people obtain
permits over time, the more violent crime rates decline. For each additional
year that these laws are in effect, murders declined.

"Giving law-abiding adults the right to carry concealed handguns had a
dramatic impact. Thirty-one states now provide such a right under law. When
states passed right-to-carry laws, the number of multiple-victim public
shootings plummeted below one-fifth, with an even greater decline in deaths.
To the extent attacks still occur in states after enactment of these laws,
such shootings tend to occur in those areas in which concealed handguns are
forbidden. The drop in attacks in states adopting right-to-carry laws has
been offset by increases in states without these laws."

He cites the following incidents where citizen gun ownership proved decisive:

Clearwater, Fla.: At 1:05 a.m., a man started banging on a patio door,
briefly left to beat on the family's truck, but returned and tore open the
patio door. At that point, after numerous shouts not to break into the home,
a 16-year-old boy fired a single rifle shot, wounding the attacker.

Columbia, S.C.: As two gas station employees left work just after midnight,
two men attempted to rob them. The sheriff told a local television station:
"Two men came out of the bushes, one of the men had a shovel handle that had
been broken off and began to beat [the male employee] ... about the head,
neck and then the arms." The male employee broke away long enough to draw a
handgun from his pocket and wound his attacker, who later died. The second
suspect, turned in by relatives, faces armed robbery and possible murder
charges.

Detroit: A mentally disturbed man yelled that the president was going to have
him killed and started firing at people in passing cars. A man at the scene,
who had a permit to carry a concealed handgun, fired shots that forced the
attacker to stop shooting and run away. The attacker barricaded himself in an
empty apartment, fired at police and ultimately committed suicide.

West Palm Beach, Fla.: After being beaten during a robbery at his home just
two days earlier, a homeowner began carrying a handgun in his pocket. When
another robber attacked him, the homeowner shot and wounded his assailant.


*COPYRIGHT NOTICE** In accordance with Title 17 U. S. C. Section 107,
any copyrighted work in this message is distributed under fair use
without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest
in receiving the included information for nonprofit research and educational
purposes only.[Ref. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml ]

Want to be on our lists?  Write at [EMAIL PROTECTED] for a menu of our lists!
Write to same address to be off lists!

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to