--- Begin Message ---
-Caveat Lector-
Restorative Justice
By Russell Mokhiber and Robert Weissman
Corporate and white collar crime have landed on the front pages of the
nation's agenda-setting newspapers.
Yesterday, the New York Times ran a front-page article reporting that
the last decade has seen "a marked increase in accounting and corporate
infractions, fraud in health care, government procurement and
bankruptcy."
Maybe. Maybe not.
We don't know.
One reason we don't know is that while the federal government tracks
street crime through the Federal Bureau of Investigation's yearly "Crime
in the United States" report, it refuses to compile a similar report for
corporate and white collar crime.
It could just be that the press and prosecutors are finally noticing, in
the wake of Enron and Andersen and Global Crossing, what has been true
for most of this century -- that corporate and white collar crime
inflicts far more damage on society than all street crime combined.
And yet, the nation's prison system is filled with street criminals.
We are tough on street criminals.
We engage in negotiations with corporate and white collar criminals.
Should we level the playing field by putting more white collar criminals
in prison?
Maybe. Maybe not.
What about leveling the playing field by taking more seriously the idea
of negotiating with corporate and street criminals?
This is an idea touted by John Braithwaite, a professor at the
Australian National University in Canberra, Australia, considered to be
one of the world's premiere corporate and white collar criminologists.
In his most recent work, Restorative Justice, Responsive Regulation
(Oxford, 2002), Braithwaite comes down hard on retributive justice.
It doesn't work for street crime.
And, he says, it doesn't work well for white collar crime.
Braithwaite argues that throwing people in prison because they deserve
it is a failed criminal justice policy.
For all the wrong reasons, says Braithwaite, corporate crime enforcement
is restorative, while street crime enforcement is retributive.
"Some of us began to wonder whether we were wrong to see our mission as
making corporate crime enforcement more like street crime enforcement
through tougher sanctions," Braithwaite writes. "Instead, we began to
wonder whether street crime enforcement might be more effective if it
were more like corporate criminal enforcement."
What does Braithwaite mean by retributive justice?
"That you ought to punish wrongdoers because they deserve to be
punished," he says. "Retributive justice is the notion that you respond
to hurt with more hurt. Or as Nils Christie says, when pain has been
caused by crime, you fight back with another spoonful of pain, as if
that is a sensible response. It often turns out not to be a sensible
response, because you get into a vicious spiral of hurt begetting hurt.
Whereas restorative justice is an attempt to create the opposite dynamic
of healing begetting healing."
So, even in the case of the most egregious street crimes, bringing
victims and perpetrators together, along with their family members and
loved ones, is the more effective policy.
Structured conversations, overseen by government authority and requiring
a genuine showing of remorse by perpetrators, will often leave victims
feeling more satisfied that justice has been done, and criminals less
likely to commit new crimes, he says.
Restorative justice works well for corporate crime, too, he says.
Braithwaite grew up in Ipswich, Australia, a coal mining town where a
number of his friends suffered very serious injury and some were killed
in the mines.
Regulatory conversations occur after coal mine disasters. How many of us
could have done things that could have prevented the disaster from
happening? What can we do to prevent recurrence?
That intimacy of conversation joins the stakeholders in a serious
criminal offense in a community of sorrow over what has happened, he
says.
"That can be a constructive, preventive process, where you get much more
genuine commitment to doing the things that need to be done to prevent
more crime of that sort from occurring in the future," Braithwaite says.
"That is what restorative justice is seeking to cultivate. It is seeking
to bring offenders to a position of remorse."
A system of restorative justice, he cautions, should be backed up by
systems of deterrent and incapacitative justice, when it is apparent
restorative approaches will fail.
But in most cases, he says, the restorative approach is the appropriate
one.
Braithwaite says that a restorative justice system would empty the
prisons -- except for recidivist white collar or street criminals who
threaten bodily harm or who obstinately refuse to abide by the law.
Braithwaite says that restorative justice works at all levels -- from
the post-apartheid Truth and Reconciliation Commission in South Africa,
to the 2,000 to 3,000 police- sponsored restorative justice conferences
that have taken place in Canberra, Australia, where Braithwaite lives
and works.
One thing is clear. For the sake of fairness, the playing field needs to
be leveled.
Let's either apply retributive justice evenly -- against white collar
and street criminals alike -- or let's give restorative justice a try
across the board.
The current double standard system of justice -- applying retribution to
street criminals while being responsive to the needs of corporate and
white collar criminals -- has got to go.
Russell Mokhiber is editor of the Washington, D.C.-based Corporate Crime
Reporter. Robert Weissman is editor of the Washington, D.C.-based
Multinational Monitor, http://www.multinationalmonitor.org. They are
co-authors of Corporate Predators: The Hunt for MegaProfits and the
Attack on Democracy (Monroe, Maine: Common Courage Press, 1999;
http://www.corporatepredators.org).
(c) Russell Mokhiber and Robert Weissman
This article is posted at:
http://lists.essential.org/pipermail/corp-focus/2002/000117.html
_______________________________________________
Focus on the Corporation is a weekly column written by Russell Mokhiber
and Robert Weissman. Please feel free to forward the column to friends or
repost the column on other lists. If you would like to post the column on
a web site or publish it in print format, we ask that you first contact us
([EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED]).
Focus on the Corporation is distributed to individuals on the listserve
[EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe, unsubscribe or change your address to
corp-focus, go to: <http://lists.essential.org/mailman/listinfo/corp-focus> or send an
e-mail
message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with your request.
Focus on the Corporation columns are posted at
<http://www.corporatepredators.org>.
Postings on corp-focus are limited to the columns. If you would like to
comment on the columns, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
<A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
<A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
--- End Message ---
